D.C. makes Bridgeport look almost like a bastion of clean government

Trayon White Cruises To Reelection After Getting Caught On Camera Allegedly Taking Wads Of Cash In Bribes

A Democrat D.C. City Councilmember previously charged with bribery overwhelmingly won his reelection Tuesday night.

Trayon White Sr. won his race with around 76% of the vote, according to the D.C. Board of Elections.

White was charged with bribery this past August. (RELATED: DC Councilman Who Claimed Jews Controlled The Weather Charged With Bribery)

He allegedly agreed to accept $156,000 in cash payments in exchange for using his position to pressure government employees at the D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services ((DYRS) and the Office of Neighborhood Safety and Engagement (ONSE) to extend multiple city contracts, according to the Department of Justice.

“Because the investigation into the alleged bribery scheme involved contracts that could soon be awarded and other potential official acts that could be taken, our Office took swift steps to address the alleged crimes we were investigating,” U.S. Attorney for D.C., Matthew M. Graves, stated.

“What you need me to do, man? I don’t, I don’t wanna feel like you gotta gimme something to get something. We better than that,” White told a confidential source when offered an envelope with $15,000 in cash, according to an arrest affidavit from the FBI’s D.C. Field Office.

However, White allegedly took the envelope and put it in his pocket.

White was accused of making anti-Semitic comments in 2018 after he suggested that Jewish bankers — the Rothschilds — controlled the climate, The Washington Post reported. He later apologized for his comments.

New: DC Council member Trayon White issues apology on Instagram after blaming snow on Jewish bankers controlling climate in earlier post. pic.twitter.com/AH6viLZDvc

— Van Applegate (@vbagate) March 19, 2018

We can only hope that he wasn't a Kamalla fan — two disappointments on the same day would be unfortunate

25 Upper Cross Road, 10.96 acres in Conyers Farm and currently priced at $4.250 million, is finally under contract after beginning at $5.875 million on September 21, 2021. Insult to injury, the owner had paid $5.475 for the property just three months before, on June 8th, 2021.

Give the seller’s position in the world of finance, my guess is that the loss he’s about to take will be chalked up as a mere rounding error, so the St. Bart’s villa is not in jeopardy and he’s in no danger of being un-fortunated, but still, as I said, disappointing.

Of course, Trump or Harris supporter, he probably made up this loss by 10:00 this morning. , so any sadness, if any, at Harris’s defeat has certainly been mitigated.

Schadenfreude

(“ A gleeful delight in another’s misfortune”)

I wanted to dip my toe into the losers’ woes this morning so I tried the two most likely sources, Daily Kos and Politico, and was rewarded. First up, Daily Kos, confidently predicting that the Democrats own their blacks and hispanics, so there was no need to worry about a Trump victory, even as the vote count piled up in his favor (and don’t tell this expert, it it appears that Trump will also win the popular vote “Preserve the Electoral College!”)

Daily Kos November 05, 2024 at 10:59:13p EST

Even when they win, Republicans are losers—and have been for 20 years

…. Fast forward to 2020, and the landscape has changed dramatically. In 2020, despite Donald Trump winning the white vote by a large margin—58% to 41%—he lost the presidency to Joe Biden.

And that shows the daunting challenge that the Republican Party faces. The past two decades have seen a significant shift in voter composition, especially among racial and ethnic groups. The once-dominant share of white voters has steadily declined, from 77% in 2004 to just 67% in 2020—a warning signal for a party that has heavily relied on the white vote, according to an analysis from writer Myra Adams.

These electoral shifts not only signal a demographic transformation but also highlight the Republican Party's struggle to adapt its message and policies to a broader—more diverse—audience.

Part of the GOP’s conundrum surely stems from an agenda that is increasingly out of step with popular opinion. Take, for example, the issues of gun reform and abortion rights. Voter sentiment leans heavily in favor of more progressive policies on these topics, which puts the GOP at odds with a substantial portion of the electorate.

Even Trump acknowledged his party's uphill battle for the popular vote during a rally in Virginia on Saturday. 

“When you have New York, Illinois, and California, you have automatically, it’s like ridiculous, automatically goes to a Democrat, it’s tough to win the popular vote because they’re three big states,” he said. 

Despite his win in 2016, Trump’s failure to secure the popular vote against Clinton and later against Biden in 2020 marks a failed Republican electoral strategy. As the party looks to the future, it must confront the reality that demographic changes and shifting public opinions are reshaping the political landscape in ways that may not favor them.

And then we have this live report, from Politico. By now — 9:30 AM Wednesday — I’m sure the mainstream media’s up and howling, but this excerpt from earlier, as the magnitude of their figurehead’s loss became apparent, is just delicious.

POLITICO 11/06/2024 01:50 AM EST:

Democrats sink into despair after Trump win

Democrats are living their nightmare. Again.

As Election Day gave way to Wednesday, Democrats were reckoning with the reality that the party was in for a repeat of 2016. Donald Trump was outperforming his 2020 margins across the map and had won key battleground states, including Pennsylvania and Georgia. Kamala Harris, meanwhile, was struggling to match Joe Biden’s margins across broad swaths of the country, from light-blue counties that swung towards Democrats in 2020 to deep red ones where Trump has continued to grow his leads.

With each successive swing state that fell to the former president, Democrats’ ever-present anxiety gave way to shock, despair and, finally, acceptance: Harris was going to lose.

“Really never fully took in that this could happen again,” said one former Democratic Party official, granted anonymity to speak candidly. “It is beyond any words I can use to describe.”

The warning signs for Harris began cropping up even before the results from most states started rolling in. Exit polls showed Trump making inroads with Black men in North Carolina and in Georgia, which the Republican wrested back from Democrats not long into election night. Harris also underperformed nationally with Hispanic voters and young voters compared to Biden in 2020, exit polls found. Those surveys even showed so-called double-haters — voters who held unfavorable opinions of both candidates — breaking for Trump.

Then Trump started running up the score across the map. With more than 2,500 counties reporting at least 95% of the vote, Trump has outperformed his 2020 margins in roughly 92 percent of them, according to a POLITICO analysis of preliminary results from the Associated Press. And Trump made gains even in deep-blue areas like his former home of New York City. Harris, meanwhile, was lagging Biden in key counties he won four years ago — including Pennsylvania’s Lackawanna County, which includes the president’s native Scranton.

“He expanded his base a little and they came out,” said Neil Oxman, a Pennsylvania-based Democratic strategist. And that, combined with Harris underperforming Biden, “is the difference in switching a state.”

With each minute that Harris’ potential paths to the White House narrowed, the mood within her campaign and among Democrats more broadly grew grimmer.

In an attempt to assuage anxieties, Harris’ campaign manager, Jen O’Malley Dillon, circulated a memo, obtained by POLITICO, to staffers late Tuesday night that said: “We have known all along that our clearest path to 270 electoral votes lies through the Blue Wall states. And we feel good about what we’re seeing.”

Barely two hours later, Harris no-showed her own party at her alma mater of Howard University, where the mood was already souring. A clip of Beyoncé’s “Freedom,” which the vice president had used as her walk-out song at campaign events, was greeted with groans. Attempts to start “Kamala” chants fell flat.

As former Rep. Cedric Richmond, a co-chair of Harris’ campaign, came onstage to disband what Democrats had hoped would be a victory celebration, some members of her campaign were still holding out hope that ballots yet to be counted would break her way. But others had begun bracing for defeat.

“We still have votes to count, we still have states that have not been called yet,” Richmond said. “We will continue overnight to fight to make sure that every vote is counted, that every voice has spoken.”

But “you won’t hear from the vice president tonight,” he told the dejected crowd. “You will hear from her tomorrow.”

Beyond Washington, Democrats were rapidly losing faith that Harris could keep the party’s bulwark intact.

It “feels more like 2016 than 2020,” said Rep. Jared Huffman, a California Democrat.

“That’s what’s troubling,” he added. “Those of us that had hoped for a resounding repatriation of Trump, we’re left to hope for a nail biter through the Blue Wall.”

And some Democrats’ calls to not despair — “everybody fucking relax,” said Michigan state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, “there’s still a ton of votes to get through” — were falling on increasingly deaf ears. In a callback to the beginning of Harris’ campaign, one Democratic operative wondered: “Is it brat to lose an election?”

Two different worlds

Minneapolis after the riots

John Hinderaker, PowerlineI share his pessimism

…. I said quite a while ago that the election would be close, but at the end of the day I didn’t think an administration with as bad a record as the Biden/Harris administration’s, with a candidate as inept as Kamala Harris, can be re-elected. Despite the perception that Kamala has finished strongly, I see no reason to change my mind. It is much like 2016, when I predicted a Trump win and stuck with it even though, by Election Day, I had no confidence that I had been right.

One thing this election has made clear is that Americans are even more divided than one would have thought possible, just a few years ago. It is not just that we are divided over policy, as we were, for example, leading up to the Civil War, or at the outset of the Depression. Rather, policy is the least of it. Republicans and Democrats are apparently living in different worlds, with very different understandings of the most basic facts. In 1858, voters might be in favor of slavery or opposed to slavery, but no one was saying, Slavery? What slavery?

Whoever wins this election–and I fervently hope it will be Trump–we will be left with the question, how can two groups of people who see the world so differently, who have so little in common, whose objectives are so antithetical, whose demands on one side are increasingly totalitarian, live together as citizens of a common republic? Do they, in fact, want to share a common republic? Can a common understanding of our shared citizenship ever be restored? If so, how, when much of our country and most of our political class despise our Constitution?

No matter how the election turns out, I suspect the time is coming when these questions will seem more legitimate, and more pressing, than most now imagine.

While Biden's DOJ is suing Elon Musk for refusing to hire non-citizens, China has been busy. Was this where Hunter’s $1 million payoff went?

ironic name for its rocket catcher, eh? : SpaceX Achieves Its First-Ever ‘Chopsticks’ Landing

SHOT: August 24, 2023: CNN

Justice Department sues SpaceX, alleging discriminatory hiring practices


The US Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against SpaceX, the Elon Musk-run rocket and spacecraft company with extensive government contracts, for allegedly discriminating against refugees in its hiring practices.

The suit claims that “from at least September 2018 to May 2022, SpaceX routinely discouraged asylees and refugees from applying and refused to hire or consider them, because of their citizenship status, in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA),” according to an August 24 DOJ news release.

It goes on to allege SpaceX falsely claimed in its job listings that only green card holders and United States citizens could work at the company because of federal export control laws.

There are specific laws — such as the International Traffic in Arms Regulations — that apply to companies manufacturing spacecraft and rockets and limit foreign nationals from accessing key information about the vehicles for national security reasons.

But the new lawsuit states that regulations such as ITAR do not prevent SpaceX from hiring refugees, whose “permission to live and work in the United States does not expire, and they stand on equal footing with U.S. citizens,” according to the DOJ.

“Our investigation found that SpaceX failed to fairly consider or hire asylees and refugees because of their citizenship status and imposed what amounted to a ban on their hire regardless of their qualification, in violation of federal law,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in a statement.

Clarke added that the DOJ’s investigation found recruiters at the company “actively discouraged asylees and refugees from seeking work opportunities at the company.”

The suit also alleges that SpaceX “failed to fairly consider” applications submitted to the company by refugees.

….

During a 2016 speech at the International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico, Musk was asked by a member of the audience why SpaceX only hired people from the United States.

“I think people are very confused about this,” Musk responded. “Unfortunately, this is not up to us. … If you’re working on rocket technology that’s considered an advanced weapons technology. So even a normal work visa isn’t sufficient unless you get special permission from the secretary of defense.

“This is not out of some desire of SpaceX to just hire people with green cards — it’s because we’re not allowed to do anything else,” Musk added. “I think this is not a wise policy for the US because there are so many talented people all around the world that we would love to have work at our company. But unless (they) can somehow get a green card, we’re legally prevented from hiring anyone.”

Musk added that the export laws do not apply at Tesla, his electric car company, and said — at the time — about 25% to 30% of its engineering staff was from outside the country.

….

The DOJ’s guidance states that refugees should be treated as US citizens. And, once hired, refugees “can access export-controlled information and materials without additional government approval, just like U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents,” according to the Justice Department.

Jonathan Grode, an immigration attorney with export controls expertise who serves as managing partner at the firm Green and Spiegel, said that companies like SpaceX are not in fact barred from hiring foreign nationals at all. But companies do have to seek certain visas for foreign nationals or obtain government approval when it comes to ITAR restrictions, and SpaceX is within its rights to decide not to pursue that path.

But, he reiterated, refugees should not at all be affected by ITAR restrictions.

Grode, whose firm has represented companies accused of similar practices, said SpaceX does, however, have a business incentive to avoid an accidental ITAR violation and be conservative with its hiring practices. If the company did mistakenly violate export controls, it could put its extensive government contracts — with NASA and the Defense Department — at risk.

“They can lose the contracts,” Grode said. “The penalties for violating export control license are very substantial.”

CHASER: November 4, 2024, ArsTechnica:

China reveals a new heavy lift rocket that is a clone of SpaceX’s Starship

When Chinese space officials unveiled the design for the country's first super heavy lift rocket nearly a decade ago, it looked like a fairly conventional booster. The rocket was fully expendable, with three stages and solid motors strapped onto its sides.

Since then, the Asian country has been revising the design of this rocket, named Long March 9, in response to the development of reusable rockets by SpaceX. As of two years ago, China had recalibrated the design to have a reusable first stage.

Now, based on information released at a major airshow in Zhuhai, China, the design has morphed again. And this time, the plan for the Long March 9 rocket looks almost exactly like a clone of SpaceX's Starship rocket.

This looks familiar

Based on its latest specifications, the Long March 9 rocket will have a fully reusable first stage powered by 30 YF-215 engines, which are full-flow staged combustion engines fueled by methane and liquid oxygen, each with a thrust of approximately 200 tons. By way of comparison, Starship's first stage is powered by 33 Raptor engines, also fueled with methane and liquid oxygen, each with a thrust of about 280 tons.

The new specifications also include a fully reusable configuration of the rocket, with an upper stage that looks eerily similar to Starship's second stage, complete with flaps in a similar location. According to a presentation at the airshow, China intends to fly this vehicle for the first time in 2033, nearly a decade from now.

And that's the way it is

Fired CBS reporter reveals how network killed Hunter Biden laptop story: ‘I felt sick’

CBS News went to great lengths to squash correspondent Catherine Herridge’s reporting about the Hunter Biden laptop just weeks before the 2020 election, the award-winning investigative journalist claimed.

In her bombshell allegation, Herridge revealed she brought evidence to CBS News executive Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews and “CBS Evening News” anchor Norah O’Donnell in early October 2020 that the laptop contained material about “a million dollar retainer from a Chinese energy firm,” along with business texts and emails from the son of Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

But later that month, Herridge wrote that she was shocked to see “60 Minutes” correspondent Lesley Stahl say the laptop “couldn’t be verified” during a tense interview with then-President Donald Trump.

“As I watched the broadcast, I felt sick,” Herridge, who was controversially fired by the Tiffany Network in February, wrote Sunday night in her recently launched newsletter.

“I knew the laptop records could be vetted and confirmed.”

She added that she was surprised that “60 Minutes” — which came under fire last month for allegedly editing comments made by Vice President Kamala Harris to avoid a “word salad” answer about the Middle East conflict — had not been working with the news division to confirm her reporting.

There was such a “disconnect” between the two entities, she said.

…. The Post was the only mainstream publication to report at the time that the laptop belonged to Hunter Biden — leading to a ban of the story by social media giants Facebook and Twitter.

It took an additional two years for CBS to broadcast a forensic review of the Hunter Biden laptop data. By that time, Ciprian-Matthews had been elevated to the role of CBS News president.

Herridge said she continued to advocate for her report on the laptop, which “determined that both the data belonged to Hunter Biden and it had not been tampered with.”

“Our report was broadcast in November 2022, after the midterm elections,” Herridge said.

Oh for the days when CBS was a trusted source of real news.

Coming to corporate Boardrooms and faculty lounges near you (UPDATED)

harvard class of ‘25

UPDATE: Well, we know who those parents didn’t raise: Scarborough’s children..

Scarborough Trashes Trump Voters: ‘Who are These People…Who Raised Them?’