Why do our compassionate liberal friends ruin every city they occupy?

(ChatGpd photo)

Not very long ago, Portland Maine was a clean, safe little city of 60,000 souls, with beautiful parks, a vibrant commercial waterfront and some great restaurants. All that beauty attracted young people and middle-aged yuppies from Boston, and they promptly set about remaking the city into their image of a liberal/socialist paradise. They succeeded only partly: liberal/socialist, yes; paradise, no.

Here’s the latest dispatch from the battlefield:

Portland’s Monument Square in Crisis: Business Owners, Residents Demand City Action on Homelessness and Rampant Drug Use

Portland residents and business owners are speaking out and asking the City Council for help to address what they say are unsafe and obstructive conditions in Monument Square caused by the presence of homeless people and drug users.

A letter to Portland Mayor Mark Dion from David Turin, the owner of David’s Restaurant [one of the best, and priciest restaurants in Portland — Ed] in Monument Square, was read during the public comment portion at the City Council’s Monday meeting.

“Monument Square has become an unsafe place to work or visit, and has become a hostile and expensive environment in which to operate a restaurant,” Turin wrote.

[RELATED: Restorative Justice: Homeless Man, Previously Charged with Portland Machete and Knife Attacks, Arrested Again for Assault, Burglary…]

Turin, who was not himself present at the meeting but had his letter read for the Council by a friend on his behalf, wrote that his employees have had their cars broken into six times in the last month, and have seen over a hundred instances both of littering and open drug use in front of his restaurant.

“Dining guests and staff are frequently abused and sometimes threatened,” Turin wrote. “We have had our front windows smashed twice in two years.”

“The square has long been a desirable destination for strolling, sitting outside, shopping, doing business and dining — now it looks like an encampment of some kind,” he wrote.

Turin said that the homelessness issue in the square is an “existential crisis and threat” to his business and other businesses in the area. “Please help us,” he ends his letter.

Ari Gerson, owner of Longfellow Books near Monument Square, also spoke on the issue of homelessness and public safety in the area during the Monday City Council meeting.

“Over the past year, we’ve seen a sharp increase in drug use, aggressive panhandling, and confrontational behavior right outside our front doors,” Gerson told the Council.

“We’ve found needles and drug paraphernalia in the planters and the sidewalk cracks,” Gerson said. “There are people passed out, clearly in distress, and sometimes frightening episodes of shouting or violence that scares off customers, staff and even myself at times.”

[RELATED: Longtime Bayside Resident Says She was Victim of Brutal Mugging, Warns Women not to Walk Alone in Neighborhood]

Several Monument Square neighborhood residents also spoke at the meeting and voiced similar concerns to the business owners.

“I have become frightened in my own neighborhood to go outside my own door, and to face the things that we are facing at this point,” one female resident said.

“Almost everyday when I leave my house I have to knock on my door, because someone is using in front of my door,” another woman said. “I’ve come home often to defecation or urine on the ground outside of my house.”

“When you call the police, they come, but it’s hard to offer any help,” she said.

“When I go home, or try to leave, and I have to wake somebody up or move them to get in or out of my front door, that’s not very comfortable,” another woman said.

Several of the speakers called for increased police presence and intervention in the Monument Square area, as well as for the city to direct more resources into shelters and support services for the homeless.

Unrelated, sort of, because the Somalians imported into the city are only a small part of the problem, but they certainly haven’t improved things:

Welfare fraud

“I have this great idea …”

Stephen Green, PJMedia:

This California Dem Wants to Legalize $25K Welfare Fraud

Lola Smallwood-Cuevas … recently surveyed the rubble of her Los Angeles County district and said to herself, "I know just how to make this rubble bounce."

Smallwood-Cuevas just introduced SB560, also known as the Legalized Welfare Fraud Bill, or at least it should be. According to L.A.-based Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin, SB560 "would decriminalize welfare fraud below an amount of $25,000."

What's stealing a measly $24,999 among friends? Honestly, it could happen to anyone, and, if SB560 becomes law, it probably will. 

If I'm being completely honest, almost anyone could have come up with legalizing five-figure welfare fraud. But Smallwood-Cuevas is a particularly hardworking and creative Democrat, so she didn't end things there. Under SB560, prosecutions for attempted welfare fraud would be prohibited, and it would also become illegal to prosecute someone for perjury if they accidentally got charged for welfare fraud and then lied to prosecutors about it.

"Sorry you didn't get away with your welfare fraud this time, Bucko, but that was a real nice story you made up and better luck next time," isn't how DAs approach these things in the rest of the country, but this is California we're talking about.

SB560 essentially provides one of those personal force fields from "Dune" to protect welfare cheats from pretty much anything except for slow-moving knives and laser blasts. Not that I'm advocating stabbing or laser-blasting welfare cheats. Or at least not yet.

Not to be outdone, Assemblyman Nick Schultz and his fellow Democrats on the Public Safety Committee this week blocked "a proposal that would make it a felony to purchase 16 and 17-year-old children for sex."

You have to ask yourself, "Why?" Why would Democrats proactively encourage welfare cheats and even would-be welfare cheats? Why would they block a bill making it a felony to traffic a 16-year-old girl for sex?

I already told you. If there's a way to legalize or incentivize bad behavior, they will find it. And if they control a legislature in large enough numbers, they will enact it and award themselves bonus points for absurdity or being just plain wrong.

It can't be easy always finding creative new ways to make things worse, and yet they never struggle to find fresh faces like Lola Smallwood-Cuevas or Nick Schultz to blaze those trails to societal suicide.

They're the hardest-working people in politics.

(I certainly trust Stephen Green to get his facts right, but I still went to the original source, the proposed bill itself. Green has described it accurately.)

Don't let the door ...

Woke DOJ Lawyers Self-Deport After Being Told They Have to Protect Religious Liberties

Virginia Taft:

How is it that the woke lawyers always end up working in government or law schools? 

Law schools keep cranking out entitled, leftist, wannabe lawyers who are unabashedly woke, irrespective of the law. And somehow those ideologues end up as government lawyers. Goodness knows the DOJ was full of those lawyers starting with the Obama administration and through the Biden no-hold-barred attacks on civil liberties. Trump 45 never had a chance.

Trump 47's new civil rights division chief at the Justice Department, Harmeet Dhillon, now knows the depth of the problem, and her changes at the division have caused an immediate backlash. #Resistance lives, but this time they're self-deporting from the government without much of a fight. Being paid off will do that to some people. 

Since taking on this job two weeks ago, Dhillon has re-directed the civil rights division’s targets for prosecution. She told attorneys in a memo last week that, from now on, woke ideology is out and the rule of law is in. She put the civil rights division on footing to protect civil rights and told lawyers they would target antisemitism, anti-Christian discrimination, and dismantle the notoriously racist diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and to "govern yourself accordingly." 

And then 100 or more of the 340 lawyer civil rights division took a buy out package that goes through September. 

Dhillon told Blaze TV's Glenn Beck that "no one has been fired by me since I came." 

"And en masse, dozens and now over 100 attorneys decided they’d rather not do what the job requires them to do and I think that’s fine because we don’t want people in the federal government who feel like it’s their pet project to go persecute, you know, police departments based on statistical evidence, or persecute people praying outside abortion facilities instead of doing violence," she told Beck. She continued, "That’s not the job here. The job here is to enforce the federal civil rights laws, not woke ideology." 

She told him they'll need to replace a lot of those lawyers who left because "I have a very robust affirmative civil rights agenda that I think many Americans will be pleased with." 

….

[S]he says she's done "persecuting" people for peaceful protesting outside abortion clinics, for example. The civil rights division will target actual violence, she vows. And that includes firebombing pregnancy resource clinics that offer help—and not baby-killing surgery—to women who choose to keep their babies.

There have been more than 200 such fire bombings of crisis pregnancy clinics in the past few years. 

The DOJ civil rights division has been DOGE'd without doing anything other than prioritizing actual law-breaking in their lawsuits. The bad hombres of Wokeville have left by their own choice. 

As many as 75,000 government employees have taken buyouts to leave government jobs so far during Trump 47. Another estimated 121,000 people have lost their jobs due to reductions in force. 

That's a lot of taxpayer savings for the first 100 days. 

After a quick visit, these owners placed their home back on the market and it's already reported pending

9 Hillside Drive, in the Mel Brook’s-inspired Village of Rock Ridge, was priced at $3.2 million when it went on the MLS 37 days ago and is reported pending today. Owners paid $2.995 for it in March 2024.

Nice old 1911 home, but I’ve never been able to get over its location on such a narrow strip of land that’s practically on Lake Avenue; that hasn’t bothered buyers over the years, though, so … meh.