Week in Pictures

Susie reminds me that PowerLine’s Week in Pictures has posted. After a rough transition from one of the site’s writers to another, I think it’s regained its form.

And this one deserves special mention just because, as I’ve pointed out several times, it perfectly summarizes our junior senator Murphy’s own stated position on almost every issue confronting the nation. “Almost” because it leaves out his solution to the Ukrainian war, which is to keep shipping them unlimited arms and encourage them to fight to their last civilian.

Oh, please, don't stop now — we still have elections to win

Words Democrats should avoid to stop sounding like ‘enforcers of wokeness’ — according to center-left think tank

A center-left think tank on Friday released a list of 45 words and phrases that Democrats should cut from their vocabulary to stop sounding like “enforcers of wokeness.” 

Third Way, the group behind what’s being called the “blue blacklist,” sorted the all-too-familiar lexicon of the far-left into several categories, including “therapy-speak,” “organizer jargon“ and “explaining away crime,” in a memo aimed at helping Democrats communicate “in authentic ways that welcome rather than drive voters away.” 

“Privilege,” “Othering,” “Triggering,” “Safe space” and “Body shaming,” are among the words Third Waylumped into the “therapy-speak” bucket. 

The memo notes that such language conveys: “I’m more empathetic than you, and you are callous to hurting other’s feelings.” 

The “Seminar Room Language” category lists terms that express, “I’m smarter and more concerned about important issues than you,” according to Third Way. 

The category includes phrases often deployed by “Squad” Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), such as “Subverting norms” and “Systems of oppression.”

“Organizer jargon,” which conveys the talker is “beholden to groups, not individuals,” includes phrases such as “the unhoused,” “food insecurity,” “housing insecurity,” and “person who immigrated.” 

“Birthing person/inseminated person,” “pregnant people,” “chest feeding” and “patriarchy” should also be shunned to avoid “confusing or shaming people who could otherwise be allies,” the think tank urged. 

Democrats are also warned that terms like “justice-involved” and “involuntary confinement” make it seem as if “the criminal is the victim” and “the victim is an afterthought.”

“A lot of this stuff comes straight out of the faculty lounge at universities, I mean, no one talks about the Overton Window at a football game,” Third Way co-founder Matt Bennett said in an interview with CNN. 

“Does anyone in your family around the table use words like this? Do you hear this when you talk to people that you went to high school with or folks you talk to at the grocery store?” Bennett continued.  

“People just don’t talk this way,” he argued. “And when Democrats do, they’re putting a barrier between themselves and voters in ways that are deeply alienating and really off-putting.

“And we thought it was time for somebody to tell them that.” 

Contracts reported

$7.250 Million, list

21 Aiken Road, 1957 construction, last updated 1998, on 10-acres. It was listed May 17th for $7.250 million and that price never budged, but it will be interesting to see its final selling price after sitting on the market for 97 days. Probably a land sale.

828 North Street, originally listed for $8.950 million on June 4th, and later dropped to $8.250. 2017 construction, 4-acres.

Price appreciation

2 Sparrow Lane sold today for $6.050 million after beginning in June at $6.595. The sellers have nothing to complain about, though, because they paid $4.6 for it in 2021 and did nothing significant to it during their brief occupancy.

Daphne-Lamsvelt Pol represented the buyers, and she tells me that that original price drew no takers, but when the price was dropped to $6.195 in July, multiple bidders came out of the bushes, and Daphne’s clients’ offer won the day.

The sellers might have done better had they started at that $6.195 million price instead of reaching too high and killing off buyer interest. You never know about these things, but I note that back in 2021 the house was put on the market at $4.495 and was gone in four days to these sellers for $4.6. You can always over-price a house, but it’s rare to be hurt by underpricing.

And Daphne should know: Last week, her clients picked up 88 Cedarcliff Road in Riverside for $13.250 million; original price, $25.550. Earlier this summer, she priced 7 Quintard at $4.695 million and sold it for $5.9; and priced her own house at 10 Ben Court $3.925 million, deliberately “I didn’t want to go over $4 and scare off buyers” she told me, “but I was hoping to generate multiple bids. It worked, and sold last month for $4,000,008 $4,408,000. (Fixed typo)

So the moral, as I’ve preached here forever, is to price it (right), and sell it.

"Citation Justice". I didn't even know this was a thing, but now that I do, of course it is — we don’t do merit anymore

Professor Reynolds is right: they broke their oath of office, and should be punished. Impeachment, followed by disbarment, would be a good start and a deterrent

And another candidate for removal from office:

Federal judge blocks Florida from further expansion of 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention facility

Williams said she expected the number of detainees in the facility to dip within 60 days through transfers to other facilities, and that fencing, lighting and generators should be removed. She said the state and federal defendants cannot bring anyone other than current detainees at the facility onto the property.

federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday blocking Florida from further expanding the "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center built in the middle of the Florida Everglades.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams' injunction formalized the temporary halt she had ordered two weeks ago.

Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe said that further construction and operations at the facility should be stopped until state and federal officials complied with environmental laws. Their lawsuit argued that the detention center threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that have protected plants and animals and that it would reverse billions of dollars in environmental restoration.

Attorneys for the state and federal governments claimed that the construction and operation of the facility was under the state of Florida despite its use for holding federal detainees, meaning the federal environmental law would not apply.

The judge found that the detention center was at least a joint partnership between the state and federal government.

Williams said she expected the number of detainees in the facility to dip within 60 days through transfers to other facilities, and that fencing, lighting and generators should be removed. She said the state and federal defendants cannot bring anyone other than current detainees at the facility onto the property.

The order does not halt modifications or repairs to existing facilities, which the judge said are "solely for the purpose of increasing safety or mitigating environmental or other risks at the site."

The preliminary injunction includes "those who are in active concert or participation with" the state of Florida or federal defendants or their officers, agents or employees, she wrote.

State officials failed to sufficiently explain why the facility needed to be in the middle of the Florida Everglades.

"What is apparent, however, is that in their haste to construct the detention camp, the State did not consider alternative locations," Williams said.

Florida officials criticized the ruling on Thursday.

"Just this week, a judge in the same district as Judge Williams refused to hear a case because the Southern District of Florida was the improper venue for suits about Alligator Alcatraz," Jeremy Redfern, a spokesperson for the Florida attorney general's office, said in a statement to Fox News. "Once again, she oversteps her authority, and we will appeal this unlawful decision."

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said the "fix was in" and "we knew this judge was not giving us a fair shake."

"We totally expected an adverse ruling," he told Fox News. "And we also knew we were going to immediately appeal and get that decision stayed. So we will ultimately be successful in this. It's not going to stop our resolve. We're going to continue to do what we need to do to help the Trump administration remove illegal aliens from our country. You know, that's the mandate that they have. So we anticipated this, but I don't think it's going to be insurmountable in the end."

The detention center was quickly built about two months ago at a single-runway training airport in the middle of the Everglades. It now holds nearly 500 detainees but was designed to eventually hold up to 3,000 in temporary tents.

Who ya gonna believe, her, or your own eyes?

Sen. Klobuchar Furious Over AI Video of Her Praising Sydney Sweeney’s (Well, You Know)

“If Republicans are gonna have beautiful girls with perfect t-tties in their ads, we want ads for Democrats too, you know?”

Sen. Klobuchar sets record straight: She never said Sydney Sweeney had ‘perfect t-tties’ or that Dems were ‘too ugly to go outside’

“We want ugly, fat bitches wearing pink wigs and long-ass fake nails being loud and twerking on top of a cop car at a Waffle House because they didn’t get extra ketchup, you know?” the video continued.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar is calling for new legislation to address “deepfakes” after a highly realistic AI-generated video that appeared to show her making outrageous statements about Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle jeans ad went viral.

The Minnesota Democrat took to the opinion page of the New York Times Wednesday to clear the air after the video made the rounds online, appearing to show her speaking at a recent Senate Judiciary subcommittee meeting on data privacy.

In her op-ed, Klobuchar decried the bogus footage, which she noted was viewed online more than a million times.

Fourteen months and counting (Updated)

The original listing for 897 Lake Avenue expired this morning but it was immediately relisted at the same failed price of $5.2 million. It started off in June 2024 at $5.995 million and has slowly drifted down, still with no success.

Not that it will matter to the owner, who doesn’t appear to live here. She’s a billionaire heiress to a Turkish family, and just for fun, I looked her up and found this quote:

Turkish businesswoman Dilek Sabancı has apologized after saying “Being happy with lower figures, not 50-100 million dollars, is a greater success as for some people one-two million dollars may be enough.” Sabancı said she mistakenly expressed dollar instead of lira.

When asked "How much money is needed for one person?”, Sabancı said in an interview with Radio Sputnik that “Being happy with lower figures, not 50-100 million dollars, is a greater success. Have a good job, a house, a car, money to go to the hospital when you get sick, a boat if you have a passion for the sea, what else would anyone want?”

“For some people, one-two million dollars may be enough,” the daughter of the business tycoon Sakıp Sabancı added.

Sabancı apologized on Jan. 7 after her remarks went viral on social media.

“My aim was to explain that one-two million liras would be enough for the needs of life. However, I mistakenly expressed it in another currency (dollar),” Sabancı said. “But I know that many people in Turkey do not earn these figures.” 

(One-to-two million lira works out to between $603 and $1,206; she’s probably right about happiness not being entirely tied to a specific level of wealth, but that’s not much of a boating budget, even for an Italian boat; maybe a used paddleboard, without the paddle — Ed)

UPDATE: As I was saying about the cost of a decent boat …

Buffalo Bills owner’s $100M yacht sparks outrage as taxpayers fund $850M stadium: ‘Slap in the face’


Somehow I missed these; and now, I’ll bet you wish I hadn’t found them

Liberal Asks What MAGA Men Find Attractive So She Can (Continue) to Do the Opposite

(The consensus of commenters was, essentially, “honey, don’t change a thing”.)