Is it unfair to jump to conclusions about mass shootings before the facts are established? Or do we only do that when there’s a theme of the day to be advanced, like ‘Trump anti-Asian hate”?
/
(And by the way, this latest massacre occurred in an official “gun-free zone”, and was so posted. Maybe we should reimpose literacy tests on our new citizens.)
Mind you, some people did jump to the predictable conclusion, before the shooter’s identity was revealed:
