There are dozens of these suits in active litigation. So far, some lower courts have sided with the plaintiffs while appellate courts have not. Hope that Maryland is a harbinger, not an exception
/
Maryland Blocks Frivolous Climate Lawsuits
Breaking news out of Maryland’s highest court, a message that should resonate far beyond the state: judges, not activists or hired experts, control what counts as reliable science in the courtroom.
Fmr. Rep. Jason Isaac (aka “the Carbon King) writes on X.com:
In the latest blow to the climate cult, the Maryland Supreme Court has BLOCKED blue cities in MD from suing energy companies over global climate change. The court made it clear: states/local governments can’t use lawsuits to regulate or seek damages for global climate change.You can read the ruling here: https://www.mdcourts.gov/data/opinions/coa/2026/11a25.pdf
This is a HUGE win for common sense and energy security. For now, Marylanders’ energy future won’t be held hostage by dark money trial lawyers and the climate cult.
AI Overview of our own publicity whore TongTong’s efforts in a typical suit:
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong’s 2020 lawsuit against ExxonMobil alleges a "decades-long campaign of deception" regarding climate change, violating the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA). The suit claims ExxonMobil engaged in greenwashing and lied about fossil fuel impacts, seeking to hold them liable for environmental damages, costs, and profits gained.
Key Details of the Lawsuit
Target: ExxonMobil Corporation.
Filed: September 2020 by AG Tong.
Core Allegations: ExxonMobil allegedly knew for decades that burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change but misled consumers, misrepresented its sustainability efforts, and downplayed scientific consensus.
Goal: To stop deceptive practices, force disclosure of internal research, fund a "corrective education campaign," and secure financial penalties for environmental, public health, and economic damage.
Status and Recent Developments
State Suit Proceeds: In November 2025, a judge rejected ExxonMobil's efforts to strike the case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed toward trial in state court.
Jurisdiction Win: The case remained in Connecticut state court after ExxonMobil failed to remove it to federal court.
Recent Ruling: In July 2024, a judge denied a motion to dismiss, confirming the suit can proceed under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, notes ESG Dive.
As I’ve noted here before, ever penny of Connecticut’s and the country’s wealth can ultimately be traced back to cheap energy — fossil fuels. For these parasites to now claim “reparations” while retaining the riches oil has brought about is disgusting.