Medicaid for the Fewer, or the “Affordable for Taxpayers Care Act” (Skip the main article, if you wish, but don’t miss the video)

/

Media All Take Turns Sobbing Over Nebraska Turning Off Corroded Taxpayer Money Spigot

CNN’s headline: “Tens of thousands could lose Medicaid coverage as Nebraska becomes first state to implement GOP work requirement”

NBC’s headline: “Nebraska rolls out Medicaid work requirements, putting thousands at risk of losing coverage”

NPR’s: “It’s Day 1 of Medicaid work requirements in Nebraska. People are worried”

Nebraska Examiner: “Critics decry Nebraska’s ‘rush’ to be first enforcer of new federal Medicaid rules”

Nebraska became the first state in the nation Friday to enforce a new federal policy that state officials described as a targeted step to protect taxpayer resources.

The media sang their songs of disappointment in unison as they realized that Nebraska would apply provisions from President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed in July 2025) that force Medicaid work requirements for eligible adults enrolled in the program.

>>>>

Sky-is-falling headlines lose their effect when you look closely at the actual numbers. Nebraska’s unemployment rate hovers near 3 percent, making it one of the lowest in the country. Many enrollees already work. A spokesperson for Nebraska’s health department projected that 60 to 72 percent of those seeking Medicaid will qualify automatically through data matches with employment records or school enrollment, NBC reported.

The requirements apply to roughly 70,000 to 72,000 adults ages 19 to 64 covered under Nebraska’s Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion. That group represents about one-fifth of the state’s total Medicaid enrollment, which is roughly 336,000 people, according to the Nebraska Examiner. Under the rules, affected enrollees must complete at least 80 hours per month of qualifying activities. This could include paid work, volunteering, community service, job training, education, or apprenticeships. They could also qualify by showing the state a monthly earnings of just $580, CNN reported.

The policy does not apply to traditional Medicaid groups such as parents or guardians who have children up to age 13, seniors, pregnant women, or people with disabilities covered under pre-expansion categories, according to a December press release. It targets only the expansion population approved by Nebraska voters in 2018, a group that added tens of thousands of able-bodied adults to the rolls at high cost.

Nebraska’s Medicaid program spends billions annually to provide medical coverage to those who don’t have it. Recent data show average benefit spending for those using Medicaid was about $9,500 per person per year. State spending on the 2018 Medicaid expansion alone exceeded $100 million by year three of the program.

Of the roughly 336,000 adults using Medicaid, an estimated 28,000 to 41,000 will potentially transition out of the program due to the new work requirements in 2034. This will save Nebraskan taxpayers millions a year. Still, beyond the cost-benefit of these individuals transitioning off Medicaid, the social boom this will create is immeasurable.

>>>>

For those with long attention spans, here’s Grok’s summary of the original Obama-Kare expansion of benefits and what’s been changed:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid by creating a new eligibility category focused on low-income adults, primarily those without young children. Prior to the ACA (enacted in 2010 and implemented starting in 2014), Medicaid eligibility was largely "categorical." It covered specific groups like low-income children, pregnant women, parents of dependent children (with state income limits often around 64% of the federal poverty level or lower), and people who were aged, blind, or disabled. Many low-income childless adults (and even some parents) fell into a coverage gap in most states, especially if they didn't fit those categories or had incomes too high for traditional limits.

The ACA added a new pathway (Section 2001 of the law): States could (and still can) opt to cover nearly all adults ages 19–64 with household incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL)—about $21,600 for an individual or $37,000 for a family of three in recent guidelines—based primarily on income alone, without needing to meet the old categorical rules. This is often called the "ACA Medicaid expansion" or "expansion population." It covers both parents (whose prior limits were raised) and especially childless adults who previously had almost no access in most states.

Nothing has been "subtracted" from the core expansion in the sense of repealing it or removing the income-based eligibility. The expansion remains fully in place in adopting states. However, the current debate (as of May 2026) centers on new federal work/community engagement requirements that apply specifically to adults in this ACA expansion group (and similar adults in a couple of partial-expansion states like Georgia and Wisconsin). These requirements were enacted as part of the 2025 federal budget reconciliation law (often called the "One Big Beautiful Bill" or H.R. 1), signed by President Trump on July 4, 2025.

Key Details of the New Requirements

  • Who it affects: Adults ages 19–64 enrolled through the ACA expansion (or equivalent waiver programs). Traditional Medicaid groups (e.g., children, pregnant women, disabled individuals, elderly) are generally exempt or not targeted.

  • What’s required: At least 80 hours per month (averaged) of work, job training, education, or community service/volunteering. Some states can require proof of recent compliance (e.g., 1–3 months of qualifying activity) when applying or renewing.

  • Exemptions: Available for pregnancy, caregiving for young children or incapacitated family members, students, disability/medical frailty, certain hardships (e.g., natural disasters, high unemployment areas), and others.

  • Timeline: Mandatory nationwide start date is January 1, 2027, with states required to check compliance at application and at least every 6 months at renewal. Some states are starting earlier via state plan amendments or waivers (e.g., Nebraska in May 2026, Montana in July 2026, others planning soft launches).

  • Enforcement: Failure to meet the requirement (or qualify for an exemption) can result in loss of coverage. States must update systems, notices, and portals to track this.

The DebateSupporters (mostly Republicans) argue this promotes self-sufficiency, aligns Medicaid more with programs like TANF or SNAP that have work rules, encourages healthier behaviors through employment, and reduces federal spending (Congressional Budget Office estimates ~$326 billion in Medicaid savings over 10 years, largely from coverage losses). They note that many expansion enrollees already work, but the policy targets "able-bodied" adults.

In short: The ACA added broad income-based coverage for low-income working-age adults (the expansion group). The 2025 law is now conditioning ongoing eligibility for many in that group on meeting work/community engagement rules—effectively "subtracting" coverage from those who don’t comply or navigate the new bureaucracy, without changing the underlying income eligibility rules or repealing the expansion itself.

Related, but more fun to watch, enjoy this video — the look of disgust on her face when she’s forced to buy asparagus and orange juice instead of Little Debbies is priceless.

Guess Who’s Big Mad They Can’t Buy Junk Food With Your Tax Money Anymore

Food stamp users in Florida are waking up to some big changes that took place in their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits that took effect April 20. The entitlement program’s beneficiaries can no longer use their EBT cards to purchase soda, energy drinks, candy, and “ultra-processed prepared desserts” such as Twinkies, cookies, cupcakes, and other packaged sweets.

They can continue to use their taxpayer-funded, free-food cards for fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy and other staples. They can also use their EBT cards for coffee, tea, bottled water, and sport drinks. On the snack side, they can use their EBT cards for granola bars, freshly prepared baked goods, and packaged “breakfast” foods such as toaster strudels and breakfast biscuits.

The federal government did not implement the restrictions, even though the state of Florida’s SNAP program receives subsidies from the government. Rather, this a state policy which is being implemented under a waiver program from the Trump administration.

Guess who’s not happy about the change?