Not that we needed confirmation, but maybe this will convince morons like Jim Himes to shut up

Democrats Call For Congressional Vote On Trump's 'Illegal' War Against Iran

Rep. Jim Himes warns Iran strike could lead to ‘dead soldiers and sailors’

John Hinderaker, PowerLine:

Russia Confesses

Iran has always claimed that its nuclear program is aimed at civilian uses, not production of nuclear weapons. This is an absurd pretense: Iran has abundant oil resources, and no reason to build nuclear power plants. Do other oil-producing countries, like Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, invest countless billions in atomic energy? Of course not. Nevertheless, the mullahs have stuck doggedly to this excuse.

Earlier today, Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council and Vladimir Putin’s right-hand man, let the cat out of the bag:

“What have the Americans accomplished with their nighttime strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran?” Medvedev questioned in a post on social media. “The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads.”

Well, there you have it. The issue is not electricity, it is the “future production of nuclear weapons,” which “now we can say…outright.” So our military strike was fully justified.

What about Medvedev’s claim that multiple countries are lining up to hand nukes over to the mullahs? I don’t believe it; if that were true, they could have done it a long time ago and saved Ayatollah Khamenei and his cohorts a lot of trouble.

I’ll part company with Hinderker on his concluding argument calling for regime change, for now, but events may prove him right.

But Medvedev’s claim confirms the necessity of regime change. If we can now stipulate that the mullahs want nuclear weapons for the purpose of attacking their enemies, including the U.S., and we believe there is a serious risk that they will acquire such weapons either through their own efforts or because they are supplied by other enemies of the U.S. who may be deterred by rational calculation from attacking us themselves, there is no solution but to overthrow the regime and install a sane government.

A fowl tide brings the chickens home to roost

Oooh, I hate when this happens!

[90 feet 7 inches, but who’s counting? Ed]

Greenwich Police Marine Section responded to an incident Saturday morning around 10:00am when they received a call on the VHF emergency channel regarding a situation involving a 70-foot sailboat that had run aground on the rocks known as “Hens and Chickens,” located directly east of Island Beach.

Upon arrival, Marine Section Officers made contact with the vessel and confirmed that all three individuals onboard were unharmed, but the sailboat could not be freed from the rocks.

… Police said SEATOW then engaged in salvage operations to remove the vessel, which they said was expected to continue into late evening and asked boaters to avoid creating large wakes, to help facilitate removal efforts.

It’s always tempting, when leaving Greenwich Harbor, to cut inside Island Beach and save a few minutes getting to the open waters of Long Island Sound. Tempting, and it works if (a) the tide’s right; (b) you don’t cut too close; and (c) you’re not trying the trick on a 70’ yacht with an 8’ draft. I guess the skipper knows that now.

As of this evening Police report that the crew is still aboard but in fine mettle and entertaining themselves witn entertainment supplies provided by our Greenwich Marine Patrol.

“Makes thinking fun” — gotta love it

Our State Department doesn't seem to improved its vetting process since Harry Hopkins was sending it recruits

when harry met stallie

Twitchy: State Dept. Visa Specialist Wants Elon Musk Lynched and Much More

Normally, we don't post long videos, but this 10-minute video from O'Keefe Media Group is captivating all the way through. Listen to Arslan Akhtar, a visa specialist for the State Department, give his views on white people ('It's a culture of hatred, ultimately, and it's a culture of dominance"), terrible Jewish people in the State Department, "like really garbage people," and Elon Musk ("I would love for him to be dragged out of the building, with his hair plugs … and lynched on the street"). And that's just in the first minute.

The post continues:

… want a loophole, keep your mouth shut.”

“F**ck these people [Israelis]… I hate them to death.”

We guess we should have said above that he's a former State Department contractor:

The post continues:

… advises them, he said:

“Don’t admit the truth. Don’t tell them what you did.”

In response, the State Department issued a statement to OMG:

“The contractor is no longer employed… Upholding the rule of law and protecting the integrity of our immigration system is essential, which is why the Department will launch a new contractor screening and vetting process.”

That’s one down, how many thousands are left?

The department will launch a new contractor vetting process? New, as in they didn't have one before? How did this guy ever get hired?

I'm not saying this person's from Greenwich, only that it's easy to imagine her in, say, Riverside

Of course, they’re on the West Coast too.

THAT'LL Show 'Em! Nothing Says Hollywood Stands with Gaza Like Their Trans Kids Going on a Hunger Strike

(I hadn’t run into Holly Briden before — she’s pretty funny)

Two articles about Buster Bombs that caught my eye Updated: Events overtook me as I was writing this 15 minutes ago

The first is by David Strom, who is, in my experience reading his work over the past few years, solid and not given to hyperbole.

Fordow Could Be a Tougher Nut to Crack Than Most People Think

A conventional wisdom has developed that only the United States has the capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow, and that the US most certainly does have that capability. 

But what if that second assumption is false? Could it be that Iran's Fordow enrichment site is actually not vulnerable to destruction from the air?

Unfortunately, the answer is that it could be so. Not that it IS so, but the common assumption that only depth and layers of rock and concrete are the obstacles an airstrike would face is likely incorrect. 

No, I am not talking about impregnable air defenses or anything so easily dealt with. The layered defenses that everybody assumes are the only other obstacles really are not significant problems for the United States. By the time any B-2 bombers reached Fordow the US and Israel will likely have total air supremacy, and any remnant air defenses would be unlikely to present much of a threat. 

It is the nature of Fordow itself that is the problem. The farther down the rabbit hole I dig, the more obvious it becomes that removing Fordow from the board for a long time will be very, very difficult. 

…. This may be why Trump has been hesitating to actually deploy it. He hopes Iran will surrender its nuclear program without having to test the MOP in combat against such a difficult target. We know it works in testing. We don't know if it will do the job we want it to do right here, right now. 

The article goes on at length explaining why the task is so complicated but, bottom line, it may take many more than just the two bombs the media’s been talking about, and it may not succeed regardless. Read the whole thing.

The second article was written by a retired general, and we’ve learned at least since the Vietnam War that generals can be wrong almost as often as Washington “experts”, so who knows? I certainly don’t have the technical background to evaluate his argument, but it;s interesting. And I remember Iraq.

ROBERT MAGINNIS: Don’t be misled—Iran isn’t days away from a nuclear bomb

As tensions between Israel and Iran escalate, the airwaves are full of alarmist commentary. Military analysts and political leaders alike are warning that Tehran is "on the brink" of possessing a nuclear weapon. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt even claimed, "Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon … and it would take a couple weeks to complete the production of that weapon." This is not just a misstatement. It is misinformation—and it risks pushing the United States into a hasty and unjustified war.

The reality is far more complex. Enriched uranium—even at weapons-grade levels—is only one component of a long, technically demanding process required to create a functional nuclear bomb. Understanding why this alarmism is premature requires a clear breakdown of what’s actually involved in building such a device.

According to U.S. experts and declassified intelligence assessments, a nuclear weapon requires at least the following elements:

  1. Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU): Iran would need U-235 enriched to 90%, but that alone is insufficient.

  2. Precision Shaping: The uranium must be machined into a flawless sphere, requiring high-end metallurgy and computing.

  3. Explosive Lenses: Carefully placed charges must detonate simultaneously to compress the core—a method called implosion.

  4. Trigger Mechanisms: These detonators must be precisely synchronized; even a microsecond delay renders the weapon ineffective.

  5. Reflectors and Tampers: Elements like beryllium are required to maintain compression and sustain the chain reaction.

  6. Weaponization: The bomb must be ruggedized into a functional assembly, including casing and electronics that can survive delivery.

  7. Delivery Systems: The weapon must be fitted onto a missile, aircraft, or another platform capable of reaching its target.

“In addition to enriched uranium and implosion mechanisms, a functional nuclear weapon requires several other complex components that Iran has not demonstrably mastered. These include a neutron initiator to trigger the chain reaction, precision fusing and arming systems, and reentry vehicle technology if the weapon is to be missile-delivered. A credible nuclear arsenal also demands sub-critical testing infrastructure to validate design functionality and safety protocols to control explosive yield. These technical requirements involve advanced engineering, testing, and materials—none of which are confirmed to exist in Iran’s program today.”

Like Strom’s article, this one is worth reading in its entirety.

This is who's indoctrinating today's (and the past few decades') college students

Coming this Tuesday, June 24th

NYC’s got a communist running for Mayor and there’s a good chance he’ll be elected. I don’t care about NYC residents’ problems — they’ve brought them on themselves — but this editorial from genuwine, real-live college perfessers and economic experts did catch my eye. We can’t move students off campuses and into trade schools fast enough.

Economists unite in support of Zohran Mamdani’s plan for New York City

Leading economists endorse Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral plan to freeze rents, expand free buses, and launch public grocery stores.

Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral platform is a practical blueprint to tackle some of New York City’s most pressing problems.

[You’ll be disappointed — or not — that these mouthbreathers don’t foresee any adverse effects from this “blueprint” nor do they mention how all this trough feeding will be paid for, but they never do, do they?]

We write, as economists from across the world, to support Zohran Mamdani’s mayoral platform as a bold yet practical blueprint to tackle some of New York City’s most urgent challenges—above all, the cost of living. His platform proposes targeted, responsible interventions that would immediately improve millions of lives while building a fairer and prosperous New York.

At the heart of Mamdani’s platform is his plan for a rent freeze, offering urgent relief to over 2 million tenants in rent-stabilized apartments facing inflationary shocks and displacement. As economists, we recognize that unchecked rent spikes destabilize neighborhoods, increase homelessness—a far costlier public burden—and drain local economies. A rent freeze, together with long-term commitments to building at least 200,000 additional rent-stabilized and public units, is commonsense policy that pairs immediate relief with structural problem-solving.

Mamdani’s prioritization of free buses builds on the success already demonstrated by the fare-free bus pilot program on five lines in each borough of New York City. Eliminating fares was shown to increase bus ridership by more than 30 percent, markedly reduce violence against bus drivers, and provide real economic relief for low-income New Yorkers. The data from the pilot confirm that the fare-free bus model works and Mamdani’s proposal to expand it citywide makes clear fiscal sense.

His platform’s commitment to universal no-cost childcare is both an imperative for gender equity and an economic necessity. Exorbitant prices of childcare prices out parents, especially women, from the workforce, stifling productivity, and driving families out of the city. By lifting the crushing financial burden on families, Mamdani’s plan would create quality jobs in the care economy and generate a multiplier effect to benefit the entire city. Study after study demonstrates that public investment in childcare yields some of the highest returns of any social spending.

To combat skyrocketing food prices, Mamdani proposes city-owned grocery stores—a “public option,” utilizing economies of scale to supply healthy food at affordable rates. These municipal grocers would sell staples at wholesale prices, leveraging public purchasing power and economies of scale, eliminate food deserts, and provide New Yorkers immediate relief from price gouging. The economic data is clear: When the public sector steps in to correct market failures in the provision of essential goods, consumers benefit.

Taken together, Mamdani’s responsibly costed economic policies form a coherent agenda that rejects austerity and embraces the city’s power to make life more affordable for New Yorkers. While any ambitious policy agenda requires careful planning in its implementation, we encourage policymakers and voters to evaluate these proposals, which stand up to rigorous scrutiny, on their economic merits. We support Mamdani’s bold vision for a more affordable New York.

Signed,

Isabella Weber, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

James K. Galbraith, Professor of Economics, University of Texas at Austin [No surprise, he’s the spawn of John Kenneth Galbraith; Harvard and Yale degrees, of course]

Ha-Joon Chang, Professor of Economics, SOAS University of London

Jayati Ghosh, Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

José Gabriel Palma, Emeritus Senior Lecturer, University of Cambridge; Professor of Economics, University of Santiago

Daniela Gabor, Professor of Economics, SOAS University of London

Jostein Hauge, Assistant Professor, Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge

Stephen Nuñez

J. W. Mason, Associate Professor of Economics, John Jay College, City University of New York

Nikolaos Chatzarakis, Assistant Professor of Economics, The New School for Social Research

Lenore M. Palladino, Associate Professor of Economics & Public Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Justin Bloesch, Assistant Professor, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University

Mark Paul, Associate Professor of Economics, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University

Emily Eisner, Chief Economist, Fiscal Policy Institute

Carolina Alves, Associate Professor of Economics, Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP), University College London

Yanis Varoufakis, Former Minister of Finance, Greece

Clara Mattei, Professor of Economics, The University of Tulsa Oklahoma

Mona Ali, Associate Professor of Economics, State University of New York (SUNY)

Leila E Davis, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston

Michael Ash, Faculty  of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst

(Full list of signatories here.)

These people have been watching too many of Tucker Carlson’s videos, like this one on the wonders of Russian supermarkets, where he praises the store (there’s only one, and it’s in Moscow) wonderful variety (false) and their low prices (no mention of low wages).

Reality smacks rent control in the face

Rents jumping shocking 15% after NYC ditches broker fees: ‘It’s discouraging’

The city ditched broker fees last week in a supposed win for tenants, but landlords had the last laugh — wasting little time sending rents skyrocketing in an effort to recoup their anticipated losses.

Rents shot up a shocking 15% in the week since the controversial FARE Act took effect, with the average rental in the Big Apple jumping from $4,750 to $5,500, according to an analysis by real estate analytics firm UrbanDigs.

“The Manhattan rental market has seen a sharp reaction,” said John Walkup, UrbanDigs’ co-founder.

The FARE Act, which prohibits agents representing property owners from charging renters a “broker fee,” also requires that all fees a tenant owes be included in rental agreements and real estate listings.

But the rising rents “suggests that landlords may be attempting to incorporate broker fees into the rent, which would transfer the cost to renters in a less direct, but very real way,” added Walkup. 

The law change has created what insiders tell The Post is a “shadow market” — apartments that aren’t listed so landlords can still get tenants to cover the fee.

“We’re going to be looking for apartments again like it’s 1999 … where you have to know who to call and when to call,” said Jason Haber, co-founder of the American Real Estate Association and a broker at Compass. 

“It’s going to be an odyssey.”

And listings dried up overnight with an estimated 2,000 vanishing from website StreetEasy on June 11 — the day the FARE Act took effect — while UrbanDigs found available apartments dropped by an eye popping 30%.

Renters meanwhile have been sharing horror stories online, with receipts — like screenshots of conversations with brokers flat out telling them they get one price if they pay the broker fee and another, much higher rate, if they don’t.

One New Yorker, for instance, was told by an agent the rent was going up $700.

Another said a landlord was asking $6,800 for a 3-bedroom with a broker fee — or $8,000 with no fee, which is illegal to advertise under the new law.

“We’ve been inundated with prospective tenants who have asked our agents for the option to pay our brokerage commission, directly and maintain the benefit of the lower pre-Fare Act rental terms, which unfortunately, we have to tell them is now illegal,” said Bruno Ricciotti, principal at Bond New York.

“It’s so frustrating,” said Kebenae Tadesse, who had been trying to find a Brooklyn studio.

“Brokers have repeatedly said, ‘Well, if I don’t charge you this fee, the landlord is just going to put it into your rent,” she told The Post. “It’s discouraging.”

When Tadesse called out a broker for trying to pass on the fee to her, the agent took down the listing, marking it as “temporarily off market” on StreetEasy since June 11.

Exactly as predicted and reported here last week on June 13th:

Who would ever have expected this?

Robert Spencer, no fan of Islam he, asks an obvious question that hasn't really been focused on (by me, anyway):

Why Does Iran Hate Israel?

In all the excitement over the bombings of Tehran by Israel and Tel Aviv by Iran, the question has too seldom been asked: what exactly is Iran’s beef with Israel? Why does the Islamic Republic consider the Jewish state to be a mortal enemy, to the extent of repeatedly vowing its imminent destruction?

The answer is not immediately clear or obvious. After all, the two countries don’t border upon one another. They have no competing territorial claims. They have no competing economic interests. From the standpoint of the issues that have ordinarily caused conflicts among nations, Iran’s hostility to Israel makes about as much sense as if the leaders of the United States were suddenly to decide that the chief enemy of our nation was Costa Rica, and began to shower that small Central American nation with endless threats and saber-rattling.

The real reason, however, for the Islamic Republic’s hostility to Israel is quite clear, and is found in the official name of the nation itself. Iran is an Islamic republic. It is dedicated to the scrupulous implementation of Islamic law. The Qur’an, meanwhile, says that the Jews are among those who are “the most vehement of mankind in hostility to those who believe” (5:82). This has the effect, along with the tidal wave of antisemitic material that is elsewhere in the Qur’an, as well as in the traditions of Muhammad, of making Muslims vehement in hostility toward Jews. 

That, in sum, is the basis of the Iranian government’s hostility to Israel, as Iranian officials themselves have made clear on numerous occasions. As they launched drones toward Israel last week, Iranian officers recited passages from the Qur’an.

On Oct. 1, 2024, as he prepared to launch 200 ballistic missiles against Israel, the late commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, Hossein Salami, recited another passage from the Qur’an, saying: “In the name of Allah, the Merciful, the Compassionate. [The Quran says:] ‘Fight them, and Allah will punish them at your hands, put them to shame, help you overcome them, and soothe the hearts of the believers.’” That’s Qur’an 9:14-15, which tells Muslims that they are the executors of Allah’s wrath on earth, as Allah will punish unbelievers through the actions of the believers. The ballistic missiles that Salami was launching were, therefore, a manifestation of the divine punishment of the Jews.

….

Ahmad Alamolhoda, a member of the Assembly of Experts, which chooses and supervises the Supreme Leader, said in 2013: “The destruction of Israel is the idea of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and is one of the pillars of the Iranian Islamic regime. We cannot claim that we have no intention of going to war with Israel.” Iran doesn’t just want to destroy Israel; it sees the destruction of Israel as one of its foremost goals as an Islamic republic. If Iran were not trying to destroy Israel, it would not be fulfilling its mission as an Islamic regime. 

Salami summed it up back in March 2014. “Despite the geographical distance,” he said, “we are attached to the hearts of the Palestinians. How is it that our slogans and goals are identical to the slogans and causes of the Palestinians? Why do we strive to become martyrs and risk our lives for the Palestinian cause? The answer is that the religion of Islam has designated this for us — this goal, this motivation, this belief, this energy — so that we, here, can muster all our energies in order to annihilate the Zionist entity, more than 1,400 kilometers away. We are ready for that moment in the future.” 

And here it is.

A bit of “news” here, from another source:

B-2 stealth bombers appear to be on the move hours before Trump expected at White House

Six B-2 stealth bombers from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri appear to be en route to a U.S. Air Force base in Guam, according to flight tracking data and voice communications with air traffic control. 

The bombers apparently refueled after launching from Missouri, suggesting they launched without full fuel tanks due to a heavy onboard payload, which could be bunker-buster bombs.

The B-2 can carry two 15-ton bunker-buster bombs—which only the U.S. possesses.

This is Fox News, and Fox is as capable of hysterical speculation as any of its competitors, so who knows? We may find out though, soon.

Update: Just a reminder that the Boys of Iran refer to Israel as the “Little Satan” and the US as ‘Great Satan” and have vowed to destroy both. Fortunately, the wisest people in Washington, the experts whose negotiation skills brought us to the current state of affairs, aren’t alarmed by that, and can explain all.

Sure: at The French Laundry, or at your winery?

“I can’t hear you!”

In 2020, California’s milksop locked the Little People in their homes while he and his fellow millionaires whooped it up at The French Laundry (no they weren’t scrubbing their facemasks, they were dining on illegal foie gras and deadly pufferfish). That didn’t go over well with voters, but Governor Hairgel remains oblivious to optics and contemptuous of constituents, so he repeated the performance earlier this month:

As riots engulfed Los Angeles and mobs vandalized public buildings, incinerated vehicles, and assaulted law enforcement officers, California governor Gavin Newsom was enjoying a swanky wine-tasting party in Napa Valley.

The wine-tasting was held on the afternoon of June 7, 2025, at the Odette Estate Winery, which Newsom co-founded in 2011. Dubbed “Vineyard Vibes,” the event was a fundraiser for the PlumpJack Foundation, founded by Newsom’s sister, and featured “contemporary yet sophisticated” wines, live jazz music, and locally made pizza and smash burgers. “It’s the perfect kick-off to summer fun,” read promotional language. “The fete will take place on the Winery Crushpad, where we’ll gather for music, food, conversation, and delicious wine!”

So that’s the background to this latest bit of buffoonery, and here’s the story: The man so desperate to be King was hammered for wining while his cities burned, so some idiot aide came up with a big idea — distract attention from the Gov’s no-show performance by throwing down a perfumed glove and challenging JD Vance to meet him behind the school after class: that’ll prove to the state and the country who the real Macho Man is. So far, results have not been positive.

Hilarity Ensues After Desperate Gavin Newsom Challenges JD Vance to a Debate

Obviously, the guy who is all but certain to officially commence with a 2028 presidential run at some point forgot how things turned out when he issued a similar challenge to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2023. 

Accordingly, people had thoughts: