Credit where credit due — John Blankley changes his mind

Screen Shot 2021-03-06 at 5.46.49 PM.png

He opposed removing cops from Greenwich Avenue before he was for it, and good for him for rethinking it; i admire a man who is capable of rethinking his position (especially when that new position is in accord with my own — the true mark of genius in a man is the extent to which he agrees with you).

Blankley gives his reasons for his switch in the linked-to article. but I just thought that, having frequently lambasted him while he was in office, I ought to acknowledge that he’s acknowledging a rethinking of an issue because of reflection, and not because of political pressure or a desire to appeal to some future constituency. That’s admirable.

Diversion, or just pure hatred for her people?

Why bother teaching them to read, just to release them into a systemically-racist society where they’re doomed to fail anyway?

Why bother teaching them to read, just to release them into a systemically-racist society where they’re doomed to fail anyway?

A NY State Representative wants to add sex-ed to Kindergarten classes, and expand it in other grades

Legislation sponsored by state Sen. Samra G. Brouk, a freshman Democrat from Rochester, would tie New York’s health curriculum to standards written by a left-wing interest group that advocates “Sex Ed for Social Change” — and would make those lessons mandatory statewide.

Under that group’s current standards, public and charter schools would have to teach 5-year-olds about “gender identity” and instruct 8-year-olds on hormone blockers to prevent puberty in transgender-identifying preteens.

Kids as young as 11 would get lectures on “vaginal, oral, and anal sex”; study “queer, two-spirit, asexual, pansexual” and other gender identities; and receive explicit instruction on the use of external and internal condoms, dental dams and other contraceptives.

So, the kids in Rochester’s schools must be performing so well that there’s time for them to learn about anal sex and transgender rights, you’d assume? You’d assume wrong.

Here’s How Rochester schools are performing

Adjusted for SES, students in Albany, Rochester and Syracuse perform below expectations. In Rochester, only 9 percent of students in grades three through eight passed the state required exams in 2018. Based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students and district educational levels, 17 percent were expected to pass. In Syracuse, only 13 percent passed; 18 percent were expected to pass. In Albany, 18 percent passed, compared with 31 percent predicted by the two factors.

Screen Shot 2021-03-06 at 3.34.47 PM.png

Why? Because people have learned not trust them

Screen Shot 2021-03-06 at 3.08.11 PM.png

TIME, March 5, 2020: Why people aren't listening to experts about face masks

Face masks are in short supply—despite the CDC specifically not recommending them for healthy people trying to protect against COVID-19. “It seems kind of intuitively obvious that if you put something—whether it’s a scarf or a mask—in front of your nose and mouth, that will filter out some of these viruses that are floating around out there,” says Dr. William Schaffner, professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases at Vanderbilt University. The only problem: that’s not effective against respiratory illnesses like the flu and COVID-19. If it were, “the CDC would have recommended it years ago,” he says. “It doesn’t, because it makes science-based recommendations.”

The science, according to the CDC, says that surgical masks won’t stop the wearer from inhaling small airborne particles, which can cause infection.

That was last year’s perceived wisdom; it will be interesting to see what “science” has to say next year about vaccines.

I know that they're dissuading me from submitting to it

Screen Shot 2021-03-06 at 12.13.58 PM.png

REASON: Stop saying we can’t go back to normal after vaccines

The United States will have COVID-19 vaccine doses for every adult in America by late May, President Joe Biden announced Tuesday, moving the timeline up by a glorious two months. It may take some time after that landmark moment to get all those shots into arms, but availability by Memorial Day means we can justifiably hope for normalcy by Independence Day. The end of the pandemic is really, truly nigh.

But you might not know it from the baleful tone of many recent public health recommendations. Even after vaccination, so much of the present messaging says, you must keep wearing a mask. Keep social distancing. Keep not seeing your loved ones. Keep living your strange and difficult half-life.

"Currently, we do not have enough data to be able to say with confidence that the vaccines can prevent transmission," National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci said last month. "So even if vaccinated, you may still be able to spread the virus to vulnerable people," he continued, and therefore you should continue to wear a mask and socially distance. Don't go back to normal, he advised, even after you've gotten the shot that is supposed to put things back to normal. In fact, we may still be in masks in 2022, Fauci added a few weeks later. Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), expected to be released this week, strikes similar notes.

This is not how we should be talking about vaccines and the return to normalcy. However good the intent—and the intent is almost certainly to discourage reckless behavior that could undermine the vaccines' impact on disease transmission—the effect is discouraging and detrimental. Insofar as it might dissuade some people from getting vaccinated, advice like Fauci's might even be dangerous.

I see no advantage to being vaccinated right now, so no, I’m not willing to spend hours on the phone to get an appointment, then drive an hour to a vaccination site and waiting for still more hours in line, just so that I can keep my mask on when visiting mostly-empty restaurants populated by panic-stricken customers.

That’s the situation here in Maine, anyway, where there have been a negligible number of deaths, almost exclusively confined to nursing homes, where I do not reside.

I suppose I’ll have to get vaccinated eventually because the once -derided “wild conspiracy'“ theory that a COVID passport was going to be required for all everyday activities is now becoming the new reality, and I do want to move about the country. But they’re talking about finally releasing vaccines to private practitioners, possibly by September, so I’ll wait ‘til then.

Or maybe I won’t do it at all. Professor Reynolds points out “Some people don’t want to go back to normal” (there was some public health guru in the news this week demanding that we all wear masks during flu season — the “new normal”) and those “some people” are rapidly consolidating power. In which case, it’ll all be pointless, so screw it.

Where is their — politicians’ — compassion for the poor?

everything must go!

everything must go!

Walgreens shutters 10 locations in San Francisco because of “rampant shoplifting”

San Francisco has legalized shoplifting, which unsurprisingly has made trying to conduct a business there an untenable proposition. So the residents in these poor neighborhoods lose access to pharmacies, just as people in other slums across the country lost access to supermarkets when they were burned out last summer.

Life in these hellholes was already unpleasant; chasing out retail stores and services has only made it worse, but the politicians living in gated communities far away don’t care; “it’s optics”.

Mind you, it’s not just the politicians who are causing this. A massive shoplifting boom is sweeping the entire Woke West Coast, and voters asked for it.

When I was a kid, a television show called Supermarket Sweep featured teams of middle Americans bolting through grocery store aisles and filling their carts with food, household products, and pet supplies. The show’s premise was that, for two minutes, the rule of law—in this case, the law against shoplifting—would be suspended. The team with the largest haul could take home their bounty of groceries, win prizes, and compete for the championship.

Today, in some West Coast cities, the Supermarket Sweep isn’t a game show—it’s a dark reality, fueled by addiction, crime, and bad public policy. From Seattle to Los Angeles, a “shoplifting boom” is hitting major retailers, which deal with thousands of thefts, drug overdoses, and assaults each year. Since 2010, thefts increased by 22 percent in Portland, 50 percent in San Francisco, and 61 percent in Los Angeles. In total, California, Oregon, and Washington reported 864,326 thefts to the FBI last year. The real figure is likely much higher, as many retailers have stopped reporting most shoplifting incidents to police.

Drug addiction is driving this shoplifting boom. In recent years, West Coast cities have witnessed an explosion in addiction rates for heroin, fentanyl, and meth; property crime helps feed the habit. According to federal data, adults with substance-abuse disorders make up just 2.6 percent of the total population but 72 percent of all jail inmates sentenced for property crimes. Addicts are 29 times more likely to commit property crimes than the average American. Furthermore, as the Bureau of Justice Statistics found, “[39 percent of jail inmates] held for property offenses said they committed the crime for money for drugs”—the most common single motivation for crime throughout the justice system.

Unfortunately, as West Coast cities grapple with an addiction epidemic, the shoplifting boom has only accelerated because of decriminalization. California's Proposition 47, approved by nearly 60 percent of voters statewide in 2014, reclassified many drug and property felonies as misdemeanors, effectively decriminalizing thefts of $1,000 or less.  Many criminals now believe, justifiably, that they can steal with impunity. For example, in San Francisco, police reported 33,000 car break-ins last year; the city now leads the nation in overall property crime. In Portland, a repeat offender nicknamed the “Hamburglar” stole $2,690 worth of meat in one year. He bluntly told police officers: “I know the law. I know the rules. I know what I can and can’t do . . . I’m never going to get over $1,000 at any store.” The Portland Police Department, which doesn’t assign officers to retail theft cases, admits that official statistics vastly underreport actual crime.

Some retailers have adopted a policy of private decriminalization, in many cases prohibiting their security guards from physically apprehending shoplifters. Liability losses, they believe, outweigh property losses. When I asked the manager of Seattle’s 96,000-square-foot Target if employees followed a “no touch, no chase” policy, he responded: “Officially, I can’t tell you our policy, but if you watch our front door for an hour, you’ll see pretty clearly what’s happening.” According to reports, the store likely has ten to 40 “security incidents” a day, including a dramatic incident last year when a drug-frenzied man went on a 15-minute rampage, destroying displays and merchandise, only to walk out the door with duffel bags full of goods. Police never arrived.

The shoplifting crisis isn’t limited to the West Coast. Retailers across the nation report $16.7 billion in losses to shoplifting. In many cases, they simply pass along the cost to consumers, with one study suggesting that this “shoplifting tax” costs the average family $400 a year. In Seattle, the shoplifting boom has forced some retailers to close stores in the downtown commercial district, citing massive losses and the threat of violence against employees. Another store, Outdoor Emporium, called 911 more than 200 times last year, but the city prosecuted only one of the incidents. Other retailers have stopped reporting shoplifting altogether—in a recent survey, downtown Seattle businesses reported “less than 5 percent of the daily crime they experience.”

Maybe if they opened their doors to Mexicans and offered them inducements to come in — 1/2 price tickets, meals? — movie theaters and restaurants could also move back to full seating

I’m not going to count

I’m not going to count

CDC lifts restrictions on Biden Cages, will now permit 100% capacity

“By the time these folx reach the border” Office of Refugee Resettlement spokesman Rufus T. Firefly told FWIW, “they’re pretty scrawny from starvation, and our new friends are sort of midgety to begin with, so we can squeeze more of ‘em in. And unlike Trump The Bad One, we treat these people humanely — just ask President Doctor Jill”.

Our usually mild mannered Professor seems to be losing patience

She’s waaasist!

She’s waaasist!

Glenn Reynolds

OUR GARBAGE ELITES ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF YET ANOTHER WAVE OF MASS HYSTERIA:  Gone With the Wind, Breakfast at Tiffany’s among TCM’s nearly 2 dozen ‘problematic’ films.

[Even “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” for Christ’s sake — Ed]

It’s easier to succumb to mass hysteria when you’re garbage people performing for other garbage people, unrelieved by much in the way of intellect or values.

Of course, it’s no wonder he’s disgusted by these detestable people — I am too.. Just Monday, for instance, Dr. Seuss was a beloved writer of children’s books. By Friday, the morons have suddenly “discovered” that he was a racist all along: “Woke Parents Agree: Dr. Seuss is Canceled.”

And over at Amazon, the woke squad is still busy purging their inventory of conservative authors. They will no longer permit readers to purchase Thomas Sowell’s 1996 book, The Vision of the Anointed”. Sowell may be black, but he’s a conservative black, which, in the new lexicon, makes him a “white-adjacent”, not a true member of the tribe.

Screen Shot 2021-03-06 at 7.25.30 AM.png

So ... never, then

¡Sorpresa!

¡Sorpresa!

Governor Noisome shifts Covid plan, again, now says he won’t reopen his empire until 2,000,000 Hispanics are fully vaccinated.

He’s shifting 40% of vaccine allocations to his friends and voters from south of the border, but with an expected 2,000,000 Biden Visa settlers due to arrive at the gates of (the closed) Disney World by September, will there ever be enough?

In the name of “equity,” Newsom announced Thursday that 40% of all the state’s available vaccines will go to Latino communities in the Central Valley and in pockets of LA because Latinos have suffered the most death and illness from COVID.

And there’s a catch: Until the Latinos in these areas take the vaccine in higher numbers, California will stay locked down.

State Health and Human Services Director Dr. Mark Ghaly said once the shots are in the arms, the state can reopen.

“As we achieve higher levels of vaccine in the hardest hit communities, we feel more confident that more and more activities across the state can occur,” he said in a briefing Thursday.

[…]

Once 2 million vaccine doses are given out in those neighborhoods, the state will make it easier for counties to move through reopening tiers that dictate business and school reopenings. With 1.6 million shots administered, he said he expects to hit that target in the next week or two.

Once the state gives out 4 million doses in those neighborhoods, state officials will revise the metrics for reopening sooner.

The new plan swaps out the current color-based tier plan with a person-of-color-based plan.

…..

State lawmaker Lorena Gonzalez, the woman who’s responsible for AB 5, which largely killed thefreelance worker economy in California on behalf of her union pals, wondered how the change in the plan would affect the governor’s previously announced plan to get teachers in the classroom.

The changes announced Wednesday are “kind of not fair” to those who negotiated the deal, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez said.

“If we are going to change the tiers and suddenly everyone is in red tier, that changes the classes that have to be open, the number of classes and the testing cadences,” the San Diego Democrat said Thursday just before the Legislature voted on the bill. “So, if you get calls from your teachers union a little upset, they have the right to be upset. You don’t negotiate a deal and change the parameters of that deal on the day we are voting on it.”

The Sacramento Bee reports that the executive director of the California Teachers Association, Joe Boyd, is a bit whipsawed at how confusing Newsom’s COVID response has been.

He said the governor’s change to the definition of the red tier makes things more complicated.

“We’ve changed the meaning of what it means to be in a tier now three times,” he said Thursday, speaking on a panel with the Public Policy Institute of California. “At some point, we have to have some consistency of what to expect.”

The governor also announced that he was advising people to wear double masks.

Told by FWIW that the most recent studies have shown double-masking was useless and unnecessary, the governor was dismissive: ‘We don’t do science, buddy, we do votes. We’ve got the teachers locked in, even if they’re whining now — whadda they gonna do, vote Republican? Now we’ve got to nail down the wetback vote — a lot them did vote Republican last election, and we’ve got to put an end to that”.