Name one
/
(just trolling)
But that's exactly the intention
/
off you go, gentlemen — write if you find work
Security concerns raised over US shipping illegals across the country with no idea who they are
The top Republican on the House Committee on Homeland Security is raising concerns that the Biden administration is shipping migrants to cities across the US without properly identifying them first.
“These people are getting out of planes, we’re paying for tickets, don’t know who they are, don’t know whether they’re dangerous or not and they’re going to these cities,” [said Rep. John Katko]. The congressman recalled one high-ranking law enforcement official at the border telling him that: “The federal government is becoming the biggest facilitator of human smuggling across the border. Because they’re not delivering consequences on people breaking the law, and they’re sending people to their final destinations after they cross the border illegally.”
During a trip to the Texas border last week, Katko said he observed a father and son who had entered the country illegally being sent on a flight to Philadelphia without any ID.
Authorities also have no way of verifying a person’s identification or checking whether they are on the terror watch list, Katko said.
“You get on the plane, they don’t have ID to get past security. They come across the border, they don’t have it. They say their name is Joe Smith, they have no way of verifying whether it’s Joe Smith, they have no way of verifying whether or not they may even be on the terror watch list, because we don’t have any of the background information,” he said.
It’s all part of the plan to destroy America and remake it in the socialists’ vision. They wanted to open our southern border, the political support wasn’t there to do it legally, so they’ve done it by fiat.
I admit, I'd be one of the wary ones
/
dr. Fauci: “Don’t worry, your friend is only mostly dead”
Even before this report, a poll shows a 15% drop in confidence in the safety of that vaccine after the federal “pause”. From 57 to 32 percent.
The rest of the poll makes me think that we’re going to have a hard time reaching whatever vaccination percentage Dr. Fauci decides is the appropriate one on any given day of the week:
In the YouGov poll, 58 percent of respondents said they believe the two-dose Pfizer vaccine is safe, while 19 percent said it’s unsafe and 24 percent said they don’t know.
A total of 59 percent said they believe Moderna’s shot is safe, 18 percent said it’s unsafe and 23 percent said they don’t know.
“These figures are effectively unchanged from the previous survey on February 27, indicating that concerns over one vaccine do not spill over to affect other vaccines,” the survey states.
59 percent isn’t all that much in the grand scheme of herd immunity because 23% of the (adult?) population has already been vaccinated, and presumably, most of them are in the confident cohort. That leaves a huge percentage of doubters, and tales of strokes and death aren’t going to do much to move them to the confident side.
One California county now, state-wide next fall, (already codified and enacted), nationwide within, I'd guess, two years
/
raise high the bloody red banner
(The article I’ve linked to is from "Not the Bee”, and is an amalgamation of two separate Twitter sites (one of whom, Christopher Rufo, was “demonetized” last week, meaning he can no longer earn income from his writing). None of which follows (unless bracketed) is my own, so I’ve dispensed with quotation marks).
Santa Clara County Office of Education denounces the United States as a "parasitic system" based on the "invasion" of "white male settlers" and encourages teachers to "cash in on kids' inherent empathy" in order to recruit them into political activism.
About that invasion of "white male settlers..."
First, they weren't all male. If they were, they would have all died off by now, no matter what gender any of them identified as.
Second, they weren't all exactly "white." You would think they would have noticed this given they were providing this presentation in Santa Clara, just north of San Jose and south of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Palo Alto, and all located in the state of California a name derived from a16th-century Spanish romance novel.
I guess it must have been "white Hispanics" who were doing all the colonizing while the non-white Hispanics were somewhere busy being oppressed in-between creating one of the most powerful global empires the world had ever seen.
—snip—
So, white male settlers with an unexpected fondness for naming things in Spanish it is!
We then move on to the obligatory "Land Acknowledgement."
We've come across this before, and I typically point out that at best, we know who the most recent inhabitants of the land were prior to the arrival of the white-for-now Spaniards. To assume there were none of the wars, murderous raids, or tribal rampages prior to that in the multi-thousand-year history of the land's occupation by humans is to infantilize the indigenous people they purport to honor (and to know absolutely nothing about them to boot).
[CF] That’s just a taste of a very lengthy post, but well worth reading in its entirety, especially if you’re looking for something horrifying to keep you up tonight. Here’s one more, parting snippet]
The panelists advised local teachers to hide this political program from administrators and parents. "District guidelines and expectations are barriers," said one panelist. "[We] have to be extra careful ... now that we're in people's homes [because of remote learning]."
It's all one monopoly, whether it calls itself Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube. And an enemy of the people
/
that’ll be a no
Twitter permanently bans James O’Keefe because he embarrassed CNN and exposed it as the fraud it is
This is the end of James O’Keefe on Twitter. The Project Veritas founder was in the midst of revealing a new investigative report about the inner workings at CNN, among other things, exposing what we’ve known for years about the network. It’s a hub for Democratic Party messaging. They caught a technical director openly admitting CNN’s main goal was to boot Trump from office, and how they manipulated stories about Trump’s health and that of Biden’s to make the latter look healthier. The person admits this is total propaganda and later says they’re pulling the same media antics against Rep. Matt Gaetz(R-FL). And yes, CNN played up the COVID death toll for ratings. Again, something we all knew but now we have video evidence.
Last week YouTube banned a video of a panel of medical experts and Gov. Desantis discussing and questioning the need for children to wear masks — something the WHO itself says isn’t necessary. Why? Because the children at the company don’t wike it!
These companies, including Facebook, are shutting down all discussions of critical and controversial issues unless they conform to the official state position. Had, say, anyone questioned the safety of the J&J vaccine as recently as this Monday, he’d have been deplatformed. On Tuesday, those same doubts would probably have been permitted, because that was the day the CDC announced its suspension of the distribution of the vaccine. Don’t lead or argue, but once the government and the right people have pronounced that day’s official position, you must follow slavishly.
Back Country building lot contract
/
Lot No. 3, 11 Chateau Ridge Road, off Porchuck (thank you, reader G-Town) Lot No. 3, 8 acres, asking $1.495 million. It started at $2.650 in June, 2017.
From America's REAL Paper of Record
/
Minneapolis City Council to offer looting passports
MINNEAPOLIS, MN—The Minneapolis City Council has voted unanimously for the equitable distribution of looting passports to peaceful protestors.
— snip —
When asked whether he believed looting passports could be seen as unfairly punishing honest business owners, President Biden replied, “Well, you can’t swat a cow gator without priming the barrel bark, which gobbles up the huffles for good ol’ spazamaturble. You know?”
The NYT, Joe Biden, and Emily Litella
/
did we say that? oh!
About that Russian bounty story? Never mind!
American intelligence officials have concluded that a Russian military intelligence unit secretly offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing coalition forces in Afghanistan — including targeting American troops — amid the peace talks to end the long-running war there, according to officials briefed on the matter. The United States concluded months ago that the Russian unit, which has been linked to assassination attempts and other covert operations in Europe intended to destabilize the West or take revenge on turncoats, had covertly offered rewards for successful attacks last year.
Of course, the media flew into their typical frenzies, and (I know you'll be shocked about this) then-candidate Biden quickly used the story to hammer President Trump in the most obscene and despicable ways... even for him.
—snip —
Biden prefaced his attack on Trump with a lame "if that's true" caveat referring to the New York Times report and then laid into Trump with a hysterical and despicable condemnation.
"President Trump, the commander-in-chief of American troops serving in a dangerous theater of war, has known about this for months according to The Times and done worse than nothing," he said. "Not only has he failed to sanction or impose any kind of consequences on Russia for this egregious violation of international law, Donald Trump has continued his embarrassing campaign of deference and debasing himself before Vladimir Putin."
"This is beyond the pale," Biden continued to rant. "It's a betrayal of the most sacred duty we bear as a nation: to protect and equip our troops when we send them into harm's way."
"It's a betrayal of every single American family with a loved one serving in Afghanistan or anywhere overseas and I'm quite frankly outraged by the report. If I'm elected president make no mistake about it Vladimir Putin will be confronted and will impose a serious cost on Russia."
Intelligence agencies usually designate a report as having “low confidence” because it’s little more than gossip. But the calls for charging Trump with treason never stopped.
It was a blockbuster story about Russia’s return to the imperial “Great Game” in Afghanistan. The Kremlin had spread money around the longtime central Asian battlefield for militants to kill remaining U.S. forces. It sparked a massive outcry from Democrats and their #resistance amplifiers about the treasonous Russian puppet in the White House whose admiration for Vladimir Putin had endangered American troops.
But on Thursday, the Biden administration announced that U.S. intelligence only had “low to moderate” confidence in the story after all. Translated from the jargon of spyworld, that means the intelligence agencies have found the story is, at best, unproven—and possibly untrue.
Over Trump’s four years in office, it’s impossible to point to a single story that did the most political damage to the president. This was just another in a long line of unproven assertions by the media that we knew all along was in the tank for Joe Biden.
— snip —
“We have noted our conclusion of the review that we conducted on the bounties issue and we have conveyed through diplomatic, intelligence, and military channels strong, direct messages on this issue, but we are not specifically tying the actions we are taking today to that matter,” a senior administration official told reporters in reference to the bounty claims.
According to the officials on Thursday’s call, the reporting about the alleged “bounties” came from “detainee reporting” – raising the specter that someone told their U.S.-aligned Afghan jailers what they thought was necessary to get out of a cage. Specifically, the official cited “information and evidence of connections to criminal agents in Afghanistan and elements of the Russian government” as sources for the intelligence community’s assessment.
Without additional corroboration, such reporting is notoriously unreliable.
Obviously, the Times didn’t get “additional corroboration.” They saw a juicy anti-Trump story and ran it without checking it.
“All the news that’s fit to fake.”
A reminder: many houses purchased during our last boom are still not back to 2007's peak prices
/
22 Stoney Wylde Lane dropped today from $6.795 million to $6.3. The 2007 purchase price was $6,537,500.
