Sadly, close to 1/2 the voters who see this — and maybe more — will believe this; because they want to

/

Community Note:

And I’ll add my own community note concerning those Border Patrolmen Biden’s handlers rounded up for the photo-op, an article from June 27th:

Border Patrol Union denies Biden presidential endorsement: ‘We never have and never will’

Not to worry, it will be disclosed when Kampallawalla takes office in January, when we'll have a president again

/

you'll have to elect her to find out what it is — or anything else we have in store for you

…. Biden, for all of his tough talk, is AWOL. Foreign Policy reported Wednesday that "frustration is mounting on Capitol Hill" because "the Biden administration has failed to meet a deadline to provide Congress with a detailed written report of its strategy for the war in Ukraine."

"The strategy report was due to be submitted to Congress in early June as a requirement of the multibillion-dollar package of military aid for Ukraine and other U.S. allies," but Biden has yet to submit it 10 weeks later.

Dang, there go their gig jobs

/

it's off the roof with you!

The good news for Democrat “men” : Pederasty is not considered an immoral act by devout Muslims. The bad? Transvestites — 90% of the Harris voting bloc — are not welcome.

It is mandatory for Muslim men to have a beard that is at least the ‘length of a fist', according to Islamic law, which is strictly upheld by the Taliban.

Trimming one's beard shorter than fist length or shaving it entirely is considered haram in Afghanistan, where the beard is considered ‘a distinctive feature' given to men to ‘set them apart from women' by the ‘divine wisdom of God'.

And water is wet: PBS “Journalist” invents a lie about Trump

/

"Whatever it takes" — how true

BUSTED: Judy Woodruff Made Up a Story About Trump, and Her Explanation Makes It So Much Worse

The journalism industry continues to cover itself in glory at the DNC, with essentially every mainstream press outlet debasing itself in pursuit of getting Kamala Harris elected. Long-time reporter Judy Woodruff provided the latest example when she appeared to make up a story involving Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. 

ALSO SEE: Study Shows the Lengths Media Having to Go to Make Kamala Harris Look Good

According to Woodruff, who was anchoring PBS News' live coverage from the DNC, Trump colluded with the Israeli prime minister to stop a ceasefire deal in Gaza because it would "help" Harris. Here are her original comments, which occurred on Monday evening.

WOODRUFF: The reporting is that former President Trump is on the phone with the prime minister of Israel urging him not to cut a deal right now because it's believed that would help the Harris campaign. I don't know where, I don't know, who knows whether that will come about or not, but I have to think the Harris campaign would like for President Biden to do what presidents do, which is to work on that one, and maybe there are some other domestic issues that, you know, they'd like to see come home.

That's quite the accusation, and one you'd think a seasoned reporter wouldn't make without impeccable sourcing. It smacks of the Russian collusion hoax, being yet another claim that Trump is somehow using foreign sources to "interfere" in the election. 

Notably, Trump advising Netanyahu not to take a deal with Hamas would be smart policy given Hamas is a terrorist organization that needs to be destroyed as a governing force in Gaza, but that's beside the point. The story wasn't true, with both sides denying any such discussions took place. 

Woodruff then went back on air to offer a quasi-clarification, explaining that she was just repeating reporting from Axios and Reuters.

At no point did any news outlet report that Trump told Netanyahu to not take a deal with Hamas, much less for political reasons as Woodruff claimed. She made the story up out of whole cloth, and then, instead of admitting it, doubled down on lying about it by blaming other outlets.

Pending in Old Greenwich (Bad link before — fixed now)

/

11 Lighthouse Lane, $5.5 million, 83 days. Nice house, but I have a question: the property comprises 0.28 acre in the R-12 Zone, which has a FAR size limitation ratio of 0.315. Doing the math, that’s 43,560 X .28 = 12,197 X .315 = 3,842. The tax card and the listing both show house size as 4,986 sq. ft. — there’s no basement, so we aren’t talking buried, uncounted space here; what gives?

I despise the entire FAR scheme and opposed it when I was on the RTM back when it was first dreamed up, but I still wonder how this, and other houses, can be built 1/3 larger (and even more, in some instances) than FAR ostensibly allows.

I’m not the only one confused on this matter. Here’s what the broker for the original house said in 2005: Remarks: OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE IN A LOVELY OG NEIGHBORHOOD. PVT ASSOCIATION. SPACIOUS ROOMS, MANY RECENT UPDATES. APPROX F A R 3785.