It's surprising there was anything left for DOGE to cut

the only difference is that, while they all said it, trump means it

Watch the full 2:30 seconds: eerily identical to today.

Oligarchs

Cadaver Dick and his little sidekick Big Ears were oh-so-upset over their senate colleagues surrender to reality this week, and by gosh, they refused to stay silent; they dared to speak truth to power. Thursday, Murphy said what no one has said before, because he’s just that kind of man: “the spending bill makes it easier for Trump and his allies to "hand our government over to his billionaire friends." Oooh, billionaires! Wicked, evil billionaires, throwing the country into a constitutional crisis!

But what about Chris and Dick’s own billionaire friends? Don’t they have any? Oh, yes they do, and plenty of them.

Like Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, who’s been hiding in the shadows for decades — at least since 1990 — but is finally being exposed:

Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, 89, bankrolling US ‘working families’ group opposed to Trump tax cuts

WASHINGTON — A Swiss billionaire is funneling his money into a pop-up progressive advocacy group claiming to support “working families” and denouncing President Trump’s plans to extend tax cuts as a giveaway to the ultra-rich.

Families Over Billionaires, which launched when Trump returned to the White House in January, was set up as a temporary entity to oppose the extension of Trump’s signature 2017 tax legislation — but its “eight-figure” fundraising campaign, through an array of pass-through organizations, is backed by the very wealthy.

That’s because the fledgling Families for Billionaires, which doesn’t even have a donation option on its website for the public, is actually a trade name of the massive liberal dark money Sixteen Thirty Fund, according to business records filed in Washington, DC.

Sixteen Thirty has received $280 million from the Berger Action Fund, an advocacy group that works with Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss’ eponymous Wyss Foundation, past reports and disclosures from its affiliated groups show.

“Families Over Billionaires is nothing more than a front group for the dark money behemoth Sixteen Thirty Fund,” Americans for Public Trust executive director Caitlin Sutherland told The Post.

“It’s the height of irony that a group that has received at least $280 million from a foreign national is trying to brand themselves as fighting for American families.”

The fledgling group intends to use “paid media, rapid response, surrogate operations, and grassroots mobilization” to get its message out, a press release notes, while congressional Republicans draft Trump’s marquee tax legislation.

Families Over Billionaires is essentially an astroturf progressive organization, filings reveal.x/TaxWarRoom

Wyss is a top backer of liberal causes in the US and his fortunes largely derive from the medical device maker company Synthes, which he sold to Johnson & Johnson over a decade ago.

Due to his Swiss citizenship, he is not legally allowed to donate to US political candidates, though he has done so between 1990 and 2006, while managing to avoid prosecution, per the Associated Press.

To comply with rules intended to block foreign influence in US elections, Wyss pumps cash into dark money groups — certain types of nonprofit organizations that are not legally required to disclose donors.

Much of his money has flowed to organizations like the Sixteen Thirty Fund and the New Venture Fund, which are both part of the dark money network run by Arabella Advisors.

Part of the behemoth Arabella Advisors

Arabella Advisors, which services a network of progressive nonprofits, including Sixteen Thirty, was founded in 2005 and has long championed left-wing causes. Arabella Advisors takes in management fees from those firms for handling human resources and legal matters.

“They created an intentionally complex web of interrelated organizations that espouse anti-corporatist beliefs and call themselves grassroots — but really serve to consolidate power into the hands of a few influential individuals,” a former New Venture Fund official told the Free Press, which first reported on the ties between the Arabella network and Families Over Billionaires.

George Soros is a top donor to the Arabell Advisors network which backs astroturf progressive groups.

The DC-based Arabella Advisors’ network of nonprofits is known to have raked in eye-popping amounts of cash across its vast network of progressive groups, including $1.3 billion in 2023.

Billionaires George SorosPierre Omidyar, Bill Gates and Reid Hoffman have publicly disclosed multi-million donations to the network.

Posing as grassroots

While the trade name of Families Over Billionaires is detailed in corporate documents, the group on its website portrays itself as a grassroots organization that enjoys support from labor unions “as well as leaders and advocates from across the country.”

Among the groups listed on its public website as a partner is Indivisible, another pop-up group that Republicans have accused of packing recent town halls to oppose the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) budget trimming and federal workforce cutting efforts.

Indivisible, which enjoys Soros funding, launched in 2016 around the time of Trump’s first election victory and has organized protests in deep-red states like Montana as well as election swing states such as Georgia. [and Greenwich, of course — Ed]

Additionally, influential unions like the National Education Association (NEA) and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) are listed as partners.

Families Over Billionaires held its first demonstration at the US Capitol last month, decrying House Republicans’ effort to pass border security, energy reform and tax cuts into law via a process known as budget reconciliation, which allows for a simple majority of Congress to approve legislation.

Sixteen Thirty Fund has over two dozen active trade names listed on corporate filings with Washington, DC, including Protect Our Care, Stop Deficit Squawks, the Rural Victory Fund, Better IRS, Defend American Democracy.

And this fellow: ever hear of this one? He too has been busy for decades, but here’s just a sampling of what he was up during the lead in to the midterm 2022 elections:

A nonprofit financed by billionaire George Soros quietly donated $140 million to advocacy organizations and ballot initiatives in 2021, plus another $60 million to like-minded charities. Soros, who personally donated $170 million during the 2022 midterms to Democratic candidates and campaigns on top of that, spread the additional largess through the Open Society Policy Center — a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that falls under the Soros-funded Open Society Foundations network, according to a copy of its 2021 tax filing, which was obtained by CNBC and is the most recent data available.

The Open Society Policy Center also doled out $138 million to advocacy groups and causes in 2020. Two of Soros’ children sit on its board, the tax filings and its website show. The donations bring Soros’ contributions to political campaigns and causes since January 2020 to roughly half a billion dollars — at the least — most of it steered through dark money nonprofit groups and going largely toward political causes aligned with the Democratic Party.

Or these guys — didn’t hear Blumenthal or Murphy squealing about them, eh?

VOX, Oct. 27, 2020: Here are the 15 Silicon Valley millionaires spending the most to beat Donald Trump

“These tech titans have spent $120 million over the last two years, leading Silicon Valley’s political awakening.

“This list also doesn’t tally all political donations. It doesn’t include gifts to state or local candidates. And, most importantly, the sums don’t include the tens of millions of dollars — likely even hundreds of millions — that these donors are spending on outside groups that aren’t required to disclose their backers. So Silicon Valley megadonors’ true contributions to ousting Trump are impossible to assess in total, meaning it is also impossible to assess the scale of their influence in American democracy.”

So pardon me if I’m not moved by the panic our two native harlots are attempting to engender.

Who knew a transgender vagina museum would have such selective appeal?

an audience of one, and his lips are sealed

It snapped snapped shut in 2022, reopened in 2023, and now, sadly, the Transgender Vagina Museum is going down again, defeated by haters and science deniers

Does “cease all digital activity” mean what I think it means?

Fortunately, transgenders with a travel budget can still go north and discover what they’re missing:

Man and Beaver

Band of Beavers: That Time America Parachuted Beavers Into Idaho

Ward Clark, RedState:

“If ‘Airborne Beavers’ wasn't on your bingo card for today, well, join the club.

“The North American beaver (Castor canadensis) is a singular critter. These semi-aquatic rodents are symbolic of ambition and enterprise; there's a reason the term "busy as a beaver" is a thing. After some difficult times during which their fur was prized for, among other things, men's hats, they have rebounded magnificently, now back in and even surpassing their original range.”

…. There are, though, downsides to their resurgence, and that is that their activities in cutting trees and damming streams can cause crop and other property damage. That is what was happening in Idaho in 1948, leading wildlife biologists to try a novel solution: Airborne beavers.

Over the years, Idaho Fish and Game has tried its best to keep beavers safely away from the hustle and bustle. To this end, the agency has experimented with a number of different tactics—but one idea from 1948 really, uh, jumps out.

Back then, Idaho Fish and Game employee Elmo Heter decided that the best place for these beavers would be a remote area called Chamberlain Basin (now part of the Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness Area). The habitat would have all the amenities the beavers needed, and would be far away from human activity. Unfortunately, because of its remote location, there were no roads to get there.

The only logical solution? Planes.

“Not just planes. Obviously, you couldn't just toss beavers out of an airplane and hope they hit something soft. No, the enterprising rodents would have to be parachuted into their new homes. Now, the Idaho Fish and Game people had to work out just how this was to be done, and they did so with the help of a hard-headed old male beaver named - of course - Geronimo.”

Apparently, horses and mules were easily spooked by the beavers—the rodents’ constant movement and pungent smell unnerved the pack animals. So Heter decided to try flying the beavers in. This was right after World War II and there was a surplus of parachutes, so the proposed plan re-purposed supplies that would otherwise sit around in storage.

With the help of test beaver Geronimo, Heter created a special wooden box that opened on impact. In total, 76 beavers were dropped in Chamberlain Basin, with all but one surviving. They went on to live fruitful, busy lives in their remote new home.

The story of the furry skydivers may sound too silly to be true, but there is video evidence. Fish and Game historian Sharon Clark found the forgotten footage, and thanks to the magic of the internet, we can all enjoy it today.

“What this piece doesn't mention is that Geronimo was used to test the beaver box not once, but several times; the exact number of jumps Geronimo made is unclear but would certainly qualify him for his jump wings. What's more, Geronimo's last jump was into the Idaho wilderness that would become his home, as well as the other 74 beavers that made the trip. The one fatality, reports indicate, was a beaver that somehow got out of his beaver box in mid-descent and decided to try his luck on his own, which unsurprisingly didn't work out too well.

“Still, 75 of 76 air-dropped beavers is a pretty good record.”

Pending since November, this sale was consummated yesterday and snuck in at the bell

314 Stanwich Road, purchased new in 2004 for $5.475 million, has resold for $6.450; it began in 2022 at $8.250.

Designed and built by Jay Haverson, I believe, it’s a quality house, and although the lot’s narrow configuration made it necessary to squeeze the house onto it sideways, the views of Frye “Lake” (non-realtors might describe it as a pond) opened it up and kept it from feeling claustrophobic.

Continuing a proud tradition of providing medical advice without fear or favor

Why Does The Heart Association Favor Subsidizing Cookies, Potato Chips, and Sugary Soda? Guess.

David Strom:

You would be forgiven to assume The American Heart Association would top the list of organizations supporting restricting government subsidies for cookies, potato chips, and sugary drinks. 

You would be wrong. The AHA flew its top lobbyist to Texas to testify against a very simple bill that would restrict SNAP recipients from using their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits from purchasing these products. After all, the largest percentage of the assistance goes to buying sodas, one of the biggest sources of non-nutritious calories in a child's diet. 

Texas Senate Bill SB 379 is very short and to the point. It doesn't cut benefits, doesn't even restrict most processed foods; it just bans purchases of sugary drinks, candy, cookies, and potato chips using SNAP benefits. And since SNAP is supplemental--intended to increase the amount available to purchase food for lower-income folks, it doesn't even prevent such people from purchasing these products with their own food budget. 

That is what SUPPLEMENTAL means- not the primary source of food resources, but in addition. Supplemental. Get it?

Didn't see that coming, did you? 

Frankly, you shouldn't be surprised. The AHA is part of the "blob," and the blob is all apart ensuring that the current establishment remains fat and happy. It's stated purpose is to promote heart health; its real purpose is to perpetuate a system in which its donors and partners make as much money as possible. 

When I saw that tweet I thought it might have been taken out of context, but I was unsurprised to find out that it covered almost all the testimony, shortened a bit for brevity. I watched the entire thing at the Texas Legislature site--it is very brief, since they limit testimony to two minutes--and the only substantive thing said other than the basic point that sugary foods and drinks are somehow necessary for the nutrition of low income people is a plea to increase overall funding for SNAP. 

After all, the more money, the more crap people can buy. 

You can watch the testimony here, and the AHA testimony begins 2 hours and 51 minutes into the committee hearing. 

I looked up who funds the AHA Nutrition Forum, and as you would guess, it is filled with big food industry corporations including Cargill, PepsiCo, and seed oil companies. And even more troubling is that the VAST majority of Heart Association funding comes from Big Pharma. 

Conflict of interest, much?

You may be disturbed by the fact that a well-respected organization that promotes itself as looking out for heart patients and the rest of us is in hock to big corporations that profit off making us sick, but by now you shouldn't be. 

Nonprofits raise money to solve a problem, right? But if the problem diminishes or goes away, the impulse to pour resources into solving it diminishes. Solving problems is deadly for fundraising, which is why every fundraising letter is about what disaster looms if you don't give. Even when smaller donors are a modest part of the funding, those dollars all add up over time. Especially when groups like the Heart Association encourage you to include them in your will. 

Every single institution of any size in America is likely corrupted because the best way to grow and get ahead is cozying up to big money. No doubt the Heart Association started with good intentions--it may even think it still is driven by good intentions--but once a certain size and influence is reached the need to feed the beast grows so much that "compromises must be made."

No, not the Bee: