You ain’t seen nothing yet — and you won’t

All that waste the DOGE TEAM identified? Republicans managed to implement less than 1% of the suggested cuts, and that’ll be all she wrote: election season begins in September.

Ed Morrisey:

“Republicans nearly stumbled at cutting 0.13% of the budget in this rescission package, and only 0.9 % of the waste that the DOGE team claimed to have identified. [Although] The Wall Street Journal reports today that the GOP now plans another rescission effort ...”

The passage of the rescissions package again showed off Trump’s ability to muscle legislation through the narrow GOP majorities in Congress and pressure holdout Republican lawmakers to get in line. The cuts are the first time a White House has accomplished clawbacks in more than a quarter-century, and White House officials made clear that they would pursue additional reductions.

It ain’t happening:

Morrisey: “I'll believe that when I see it. It seems more likely that they will focus on the next budget cycle, and that the reductions there will be similarly limited if they exist at all. In fact, one has to wonder whether the next budget gives the Corporation for Public Broadcasting a new lease on life. Democrats will demand it, and Republicans seem barely able to cut this even when everyone's looking. Stay tuned.”

He should now announce that he's banning fracking, internal combustion engines, the complete defunding of the police, and ENDORSING communism and unilateral disarmament

The media has such a bad case of TDS that they are defending high fructose corn syrup now

Yes, we've got NBC and the New York Times writing hit pieces on Coca-Cola because Trump is pushing to [checks notes] replace high fructose corn syrup with pure cane sugar.

(Also known as "Mexican Coke.")

Here's The Times' take on it:

an excellent debunking of the entire “fructose is the devil’s juice” can by found here, but let’s just peek at how the subject has been treated by the hysterics over the years, before trump’s name was associated with banning it:

6 Reasons Why High-Fructose Corn Syrup Is Bad for You

Healthline

Sep 27, 2019 — Experts now attribute its excessive intake to many serious health issues, including obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome, among others.

What Is High Fructose Corn Syrup? And Why It's Bad for You

Apr 1, 2025 — “Eating high amounts of high fructose corn syrup can put stress on your GI tract. And that can raise markers for inflammation in your blood,” ...

High Fructose Corn Syrup: Understanding the Dangers

Windsor Center for Digestive Health

https://windsordigestivehealth.com › high-fructose-corn...

Jun 8, 2023 — Increased Risk of Cancer​​ While “everything” often seems to cause cancer, HFCS is associated with colorectal cancer in those already at risk. ...

Potential Health Risks From Beverages Containing ...

National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)

by GA Bray · 2012 · Cited by 51 — The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is related to the risk of diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.

What to Know About High-Fructose Corn Syrup
WebMD

Getting too much fructose can raise your risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. This is when too many fats are stored in liver cells. When you have too much ...

Is High-Fructose Corn Syrup Bad for the U.S.?
Psychology Today

Dec 10, 2024 — Diets rich in high-fructose corn syrup have been linked to fatty livers, high triglycerides, insulin resistance, high blood sugar, and an increased risk of ...

Well, that answers that

Just last week, I wrote about a new listing on Stanwich Road, that, two years after it had been purchased for $3.710 million, had come back on the market at $4.195 million and asked, “Too Soon?”

160 Stanwich Road, a beautiful, fully-renovated 1936 home sold in a bidding war two years ago, final price $3.710 million on a $3.295 ask. Now those purchasers have put it back up for sale at $4.195. I guess we’ll find out if they overpaid in 2023.

Today it’s reported as pending.

Fly away, Big Bird

Pending since March, 20 Heronvue Road has finally sold, for $4.150 million; it began at $4.5 million in July 2024.

I wrote about the history of this house back when it was reported pending, and you can get its history there. Odd house, awkward location, but buyers from Chappaqua found it and liked it — or perhaps they just wanted to demonstrate their support for PBS and Sesame Street during these troubled times — so all’s well that ends well.

From Steve Miller, to Colbert to, now, the Riverside Mackerel Snapper Festival; only the last one will be missed


A lack of volunteers has forced the Parish of St. Catherine of Siena and St. Agnes to cancel its Carnival of Fun this year, said Bill Platt, the church's pastor. 

… "It's kind of a staple of the Riverside community and it caused me sadness to say 'No we don't have the volunteer base to make this happen safely and productively,' " Platt said. 

Typically, the Carnival of Fun takes place in mid-July outside of the church at 4 Riverside Ave, offering carnivalgoers entertainment, games, rides, 50/50 raffles and food, including the beloved pizza fritte. Last year, it was open to the public for four days. 

This isn't the first time the carnival has been canceled. Most recently, it was shut down for three years as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It first returned in 2023.

Platt said putting on the Carnival of Fun every year is no small feat, as it takes close to 200 volunteers to ensure carnival goers are having fun, while staying safe. 

"In today's world, it's difficult to put on a volunteer-based carnival," he said. 

Plus, volunteers must go through a background check, training and be able to dedicate a few nights in a row to help out.

"It's not just simply calling up and saying, 'I want to volunteer,' " Platt said. 

Lacking a substantial volunteer base has also resulted in the church needing to restructure the carnival, Platt said. 

In past years, the carnival would be open to the public for a full week. But it eventually went down to being open for four to five days.

"In 1965, you could have a carnival for two weeks because people could just show up and volunteer," Platt said. "With child abuse and elder abuse, we can't do that anymore [forgive him father, he knows not what he says —Ed*] . ... Our lives are no longer as spontaneous as they used to be, regrettably." 

… "It's beautiful weather," Platt said. "It would be a beautiful time to be having our carnival but without the volunteer base, it can't happen." 

FWIW: Shrinking congregations, increased regulations, and a 3-year shutdown (many organizations that suspended activities during the government-imposed lockdown have never reopened; thanks, Fauci, thanks, media fear mongers), all combined to kill this carnival; too bad.

*Known for decades, yet hidden by the press, which loves a good story:

Search Labs | AI Overview

While stranger child abductions haven't increased, media coverage of them has, leading to a perception that they are more common than they actually are. This heightened media attention often focuses on stranger abductions, even though most child abductions are actually committed by family members or acquaintances. 

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

  • Media's Role:

    .The media tends to focus on stranger abductions, especially those involving stereotypical kidnappings, and often gives them more coverage than family abductions. This can create a skewed perception of the reality of child abduction. 

  • Actual Abduction Statistics:

    Statistics show that the majority of child abductions are committed by individuals known to the child, such as family members or acquaintances, according to the FBI

  • Fear and Perception:

    The focus on stranger abductions by the media can lead to heightened fear among parents and the public, even though the actual risk from strangers is lower than often perceived. 

A man's reach should exceed his grasp, else what's a heaven for?

A little boost is always helpful

66 Sumner Road, listed back in June 2024 at $3.995 million, has sold for $2.9; a bit more than that, actually, because the sellers also negotiated a free, five month rent-back which at, say, $15,000 per, would step it up another $75,000.

And, a bit surprisingly, two Riverside listings HAVE also sold below their asking prices, although not at such dramatic departures from list.

175 Riverside Avenue ASKED FOR $2.9 MILLION BUT ACCEPTED $2.5. BUYERS ARE COMING IN FROM LOS ANGELES, PRESUMABLY NOT WITH A COUPLE OF KEYS.

294 Riverside Avenue; $4.150 million, sold for $3.850

Different strokes for different folks

(h/t to Publius, CosbyM)

David Strom HotAir

Suicidal Empathy at Work

In a normal world, a judge would want to punish a man who tried to purchase sex from a 15-year-old. Right? 

Apparently, that is only true if you are a native-born citizen of a Western country. These days, in countries such as Canada, the United States, and the UK, the rules are different for immigrants, legal or not. 

….

In this particular case, Akashkumar Narendrakumar Khant admitted that he tried to buy sex from an underage girl--he admitted to committing the crime--but the judge granted leniency because a conviction would endanger his ability to become a Canadian citizen. 

Yes, that is the point of the law that would make it impossible for him to become a Canadian citizen--to keep criminals like Khant out of Canada. It turns out that Canadians are not super excited to invite sex offenders into their country, and weeding them out of the immigration pool was the intent.

In a decision on June 25, Ontario Court Justice Paul Thomas O’Marra said, “...a conviction would lead to severe collateral consequences, such as jeopardizing his immigration status, delaying his citizenship, and preventing him from sponsoring his wife, which would likely result in their separation.” National Post reported that the conditional discharge includes three months of house arrest during which he can go shopping fr three hours every Sunday, attend religious services, medical appointments, and travel to and from work.

Who is Akashkumar Khant? What is the case?

Khant immigrated to Canada from Gujarat, India, in 2019 to pursue a civil engineering degree. He got married in 2023 and his wife is in Canada on a work visa. In 2023, Khant contacted a sex trade advertisement that was created by the police to catch such offenders. 

During the conversation, the police officer told him several times she was 15, and in turn, he purchased the full package of sexual favors. The whole point was not just to interact with a sex worker, but a child sex worker. 

The judge, in making his ruling, specifically mentioned that had Khant been a citizen, he would have imposed a harsher punishment. But because Khant was an immigrant, he was going to give him a break. Canada needs more men just like him. 

This is insanity, of course, but it is also the near-universal approach taken by liberals in the Western world who believe that none of the rules of civilized society should apply to legal or illegal immigrants. 

I happen to believe that a certain level of immigration is good for our country. Many of our most successful entrepreneurs and innovators moved to the United States because this is where the action is, and if you look at the statistics, immigrants are more likely to be entrepreneurs than the native-born. 

New blood can be a good thing. 

But there is such a thing as bad blood, too, and we have moved away from the idea that immigration is supposed to be good for our country, not the other way around. Too large an influx of immigrants is really a thing, and not all immigrants are equal. Immigration from the third world differs from immigration from a highly educated first-world country, and immigrants from certain countries integrate more successfully than others. 

It's not racist to say that having your city streets flooded with women in niqabs who are forbidden to speak in public is a bad thing for Western societies, but at least in Minneapolis, it is not an uncommon sight. In many European countries, South Asian immigrants are up to nine times more likely to commit sex offenses. 

Is it radical to say that importing people who are likely to commit sex crimes is a bad thing? If so, I am radical. 

Yet liberals have taken the position that immigrants have more, not fewer rights than native-born citizens--even the right to commit heinous crimes without consequence. Some cities are paying illegal immigrants to help them hide from ICE, giving the lie that they support these immigrants because they contribute so much to society. 

Gavin Newsom will brag about how much illegal aliens contribute to California's economy, while breezing over the fact that the public costs of taking care of illegals far outweigh the benefits. 

It's societal suicide.