You didn't build that!

UNTRUTH: “California made them rich”

CONSEQUENCES:

California Already Needs to Double the Wealth Tax

I've written about this a bunch to times now but for those who missed it the brief backstory is that a California union is backing a "one-time" billionaire wealth tax which would only apply to about 200 people in the state. It's not an income tax, it's a true wealth tax. The state would tally up everything these folks own, homes, cars, stock, companies, etc. and then take a full 5% of that total. If they don't have that amount in cash, they'd be forced to sell of their property to cover the tax.

The argument for this, being made mostly be the union, is that if the state doesn't do it there will be no money for Medicaid.

…. What they never say when making this argument is that a big reason Medicaid (called Medi-Cal in California) is broke is that last year Gov. Newsom expanded it to cover all illegal immigrants. [700,000 of them. Estimated to cost $3.1 billion in 2024-25, that had climbed to $5 billion by ‘26 — Ed]. This blew the state's budget by billions of dollars to the point the offer had to be temporarily limited. But Newsom refused to rescind it. In short, this isn't just a tax problem it's a spending problem.

Many people predicted that trying to soak billionaires with a wealth tax would result in billionaires fleeing the state, so the proponents came up with an extra gimmick. The proposal, which might go on the ballot in November if it gets enough signatures, is retroactive and applies to anyone living in the state as of Jan. 1, 2026. In other words, by the time this (maybe) passes, it's too late to leave.

What the proponents didn't count on is that a bunch of billionaires would flee the state even before January 1. In fact, 3 of the top 5 richest people in the state have already left.

Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has been pointing out why this is a problem for the tax plan on X. The more billionaires who leave, the less money the wealth tax can take in.

Unfortunate update as of today:

More calls from friends. The total wealth that has left California is now $1T. 

We had $2T of billionaire wealth just a few weeks ago. Now, 50% of that wealth has left - taking their income tax revenue, sales tax revenue, real estate tax revenue and all their staffs (and their salaries and income taxes) with them. 

In other words, by starting this ill conceived attempt at an asset tax, the California budget deficit will explode. And we still don’t know if the tax will even make the ballot. 

California billionaires were reliable tax payers - 13.3% every year. They were the sheep you could shear forever.  Now California will lose this revenue source FOREVER. 

Unless this ballot initiative is pulled, we will not stop the billionaire exodus. With no rich people left in California, the middle class will have to foot the bill.

The math here isn't hard. Previously there were about 200 billionaires with a combined wealth (everything they own) of about $2 trillion. But in just a few weeks, billionaires have taken half that money out of the state. So even if the wealth tax passes, it's only going to bring in about half of what the authors intended. Put another way, the proponents already need to increase the amount of the tax to bring in the amount they originally planned because half the money has left the state already.

Even worse, those billionaires are part of keeping the state's annual budget afloat as it is. As more of them leave, the budget hole gets bigger and now someone else has to make up the difference. That's eventually going to fall on the upper middle class,

Oh, the horror! Chicago and New York may have frightful criminals, but there are also Maniacs in the frozen north. When will this end? Oh, WHEN will this END?!

STOP, thIEF!

SLOW NEWS DAY?

The Brunswick Police Department arrested a Topsham man on Saturday after he allegedly swapped a Brunswick man’s snowblower for a broken one while taking money to fix the stolen machine.

At approximately 7:00 p.m., the Brunswick Police Department received a report that Benjamin Jacques, 44, of Topsham, had allegedly swapped a Brunswick resident’s snowblower for a broken one.

The caller explained that he found Jacques on the Nextdoor app and made arrangements for Jacques to fix his snowblower.

Jacques allegedly took the snowblower and returned a different one 12 days later, while accepting payment for repairs he failed to make.

The caller discovered that the snowblower was still not working after the allegedly fraudulent repairs and realized that the machine Jacques had returned was reportedly different from the one he had taken.

The caller contacted Jacques, who allegedly denied the allegation, and then called the police.

Police then used the snowblower’s serial number to determine that the machine returned by Jacques was allegedly not the one he had taken.

They then spoke with Jacques at his home and reportedly recovered the original snowblower, returning it to the caller.

Police arrested Jacques and charged him with theft by deception. He paid his $300 bail and is scheduled to appear in the West Bath District Court on February 3.

A Canuck, of course.

Well, we won't have this house to kick around anymore — for a while, anyway

After starting off at $11.475 million in 2022, 230 Taconic Road has finally sold, but for just $6.890. I’ve never quite understood why this house, designed by the late Rick Moisan (a really gifted architect and genuinely nice guy who tragically died of cancer at 43) and constructed by Hobbs has had such a hard time selling, but it has. Built in 2005 and priced at $10.5 million, it sold to these now-former owners in 2006 for $8.750. They in turn tried for $9.450 in 2019, pulled it after six months, spruced it up, and put it back on the market in 2022 at the aforesaid $11.475.

Ouch.

An offer they can't refuse? No thank you

Trump may keep ExxonMobil out of Venezuela after CEO comments: 'I didn't like their response'

Darren Woods told administration the country is “currently uninvestible”.

President Donald Trump signaled Sunday that ExxonMobil could be excluded from any future U.S. involvement in Venezuela’s oil sector, saying he was unhappy with the company’s response following a meeting at the White House last week.

Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that the oil giant was "playing too cute."

"I didn't like Exxon's response. You know, we have so many that want it. I'd probably be inclined to keep Exxon out. I didn't like their response," he said.

ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods told the administration on Friday at a roundtable event with other industry executives that Venezuela is currently "uninvestable," citing weak legal protections, past asset seizures and the need for major changes to the country’s hydrocarbon laws before ExxonMobil would consider reentering.

Woods said the company would take a long-term approach and would need durable legal and investment protections, as well as an invitation from the Venezuelan government, before committing, though he said he was confident the Trump administration could work with Caracas to put those changes in place.

Venezuela nationalized its oil industry in 1975, in 2001-2005 Chaves fired 18,000 engineers and maintenance workers in and replaced them with unskilled political hires, expelled Exxon/Mobil, and ruined the oil fields by diverting the funds necessary to maintain them to social programs. Maduro followed that up by somehow managing to making things worse. Gee, why would anyone balk at putting billions of dollars into the country?

Related January 11, 2026:

Venezuela’s Brutal Interior Minister Touts the State’s Monopoly on Arms. “Venezuela’s Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello runs the colectivos. The US has put a $25 million bounty on his head. Undeterred, he’s bragged on video about the disarmed state of the people in Venezuela, that he says is, ‘contributing to the calm.'”

“Part of the fabric of Minnesota?” If so, it’s frayed cloth

Somali refugees: the gift that keeps on taking

According to a recent Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) report, 58% of them do not speak English well, and 39% have no high school diploma. That translates into a heavy use of welfare programs. 

Of Somali immigrant households with children, CIS reports, 89% use some kind of welfare — 86% of such families are on Medicaid, compared to only 28% of Minnesota households headed by a native-born citizen. More than one in five Somali men of working age are unemployed. More than half of children in Somali-immigrant households are below the poverty line, compared with only 7.6% of those in native-headed homes.