I've discussed this here before, but Stephen Green does it better (of course)

Elon Musk Didn’t Just Leave Delaware — He Started a Stampede

Tiny Delaware is a corporate behemoth, but the trickle that began with Elon Musk — as so many things do — is now a flood worth more than three trillion dollars in corporate value. "Since 2024, over 61 companies have left or filed to leave Delaware," Leave Delaware reported on Thursday, including "Tesla, SpaceX, Coinbase, Roblox, Dropbox, Simon Property Group, Dillard's, and Fidelity National Financial."

An additional seven "pending shareholder votes are scheduled in the next two months" to reincorporate elsewhere. 

Delaware’s business-friendly reputation is why the state has just about one million residents, but two million registered business entities.  

That is, until the state's corporate-focused Court of Chancery twice denied Tesla's proposed pay package for Musk, even though it was fully shareholder-approved. The decision was exactly the kind of nanny-statism that companies incorporated in Delaware to avoid. 

So Tesla reincorporated in Texas — Wall Street firms have major outposts there now, too, as well as in Florida — and SpaceX quickly followed.

Serving as a corporate P.O. box accounts for as much as one-third of Delaware's state revenues.

But clearly that's changing almost as quickly as the Court of Chancery sabotaged the state's reputation in a fit of suicidal pique over Musk's politics.

Today's news goes back to something I've written about California several times over the last five or six years.

The Big Tech firms that dominate Silicon Valley — and whose profits and income taxes keep Sacramento afloat — likely aren't going anyway. I'm talking the real big boys like Alphabet (Google's parent), Meta (Facebook), and Apple. Steve Jobs didn't devote so much effort while he was dying to get the company's five-billion-dollar "spaceship" headquarters designed and approved, just to have Tim Cook hang a "For Rent" sign on the front door someday.

But their Bay Area footprints haven't grown very much, while all three firms have expanded out-of-state in big ways. Meta alone plans hundreds of billions worth of new U.S. infrastructure by 2028, mostly in states like Texas, New Mexico, Indiana, South Carolina... pretty much anywhere but business-hostile California.

While those massive HQs aren't going anywhere, the problem California Democrats have yet to recognize, at least publicly, is where the next Apple, Facebook, or Google pops up. Tech firms almost always go from Too Big to Fail to Too Big to Innovate. It's almost a sure thing that the next generation of startups — the ones that turn today's giants into tomorrow's also-rans — will launch in Texas, North Carolina, or... well, pretty much anywhere but business-hostile California.

But that's in the medium-to-long term.

What's amazing about Delaware's "bad luck" is just how quickly things began to unravel. It's been more than a century since Delaware became the favorite place for businesses located anywhere to incorporate, thanks to expert Chancery Court judges, predictable corporate legal precedents, and a light regulatory touch. The First State quickly became the legal home for most Fortune 500 companies. No factories. No fancy headquarters. Just a P.O. box.

California's growth stalled a decade ago, and unless the business climate improves, the Bay Area will get slowly nibbled to death by out-of-state upstarts. 

….[As] Elon Musk could tell you — and probably did, if you follow him on X — it's a helluva lot easier to move a corporate P.O. box than it is to relocate a billion-dollar HQ.

Delaware forgot that. The exodus has begun. 

Sort of Conyers Farm south, which will probably appeal

39 Brookridge Drive, 18,000 sq. ft. of new construction, has been listed today with a guide price of $28.5 million. That’s a size and a price that was once more commonly seen up in the Conyers Farm development with its 10+ acre minimum lots, and this one has just 2.4 acres, but if you’re not an equestrian, do you really need or want a paddock and stables and be a half-hour from town?

Conyers Farm prices softened, then plummeted after the 2008 crash and never recovered: buyers’ tastes changed. So this one might very well work better for an uber-rich buyer. And if such a buyer truly insists on being a faux-Englishman, the gardener can set out a Havahart or two and catch all the foxes needed to feed that illusion.

Here's a shocker: Riverside home sells for just a smidgeon over its asking price.

247 Riverside Avenue, listed at $8.295 million, sold for $8.3. No massive bidding war here, but the sellers paid $6.2 for it in December 2024, so they probably covered their costs.

The pictures have all been yanked — out of town buyer from an undisclosed location, so maybe that’s why — but I covered it earlier, when it first hit the market, and nothing’s changed.

Expensive, sure, but think what you’ll save on yard maintenance, having none.

Julie and Dick have nothing on this squaw

Mouthful of Madness: Canadian Pol Rattles Off Uber-Inclusive String of Letters, Numbers, and Symbols

It started as ‘LGB.’ Then trans activists hijacked the gay rights movement and tacked on the ‘T.’ Now, even more groups are attaching their letters, numbers, and symbols. It's gotten so inclusive and crowded that it has expanded to the unwieldy MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+. It might look like someone transcribed one of former President Joe Biden’s speeches. But when it’s said, every letter, number, and symbol must be pronounced individually. A Canadian [Indian] politician recently rattled it off repeatedly during a rant about budget issues and the MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ community.*

<

*

Republicans rushing to do their fellow-Democrats’ bidding. For whose benefit? The fact that they’ve named their bill in Spanish —“Dignidad” — says it all

20 GOP Morons Sign Onto Bipartisan Amnesty Bill

Here we go again. Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to another Republican Party edition of, "With Friends Like These, Who Needs Enemies?" Just when you think that it's safe to vote Republican because President Trump is leading the charge as the head of the party, you find that he hasn't yet been able to give a spine or a brain to everyone. 

My thoughts on congressional bipartisanship are well-chronicled, but are worth repeating when things like this happen. I've never been a fan of it, for one big reason. Historically, Republicans in Congress have treated bipartisanship as 30/70 proposition, with the Democrats always getting the 70 share. As soon as I see the phrase "bipartisan legislation" I know it's a sucker bet for the GOP, and usually for the American people as well.

Prior to the Trump era, it was just plain stupid for Republicans to do the bipartisan dance. Now, with the Democrats in the throes of Trump Derangement Syndrome, most bipartisan efforts are inexcusable. To throw in with Democrats on any sort of immigration legislation at this point in history is flat-out unconscionable. 

It's beyond belief that this is happening, but it is. This is from my Townhall colleague Joseph Chalfant:

A contingent of House Democrats and Republicans have banded together to advance an amnesty bill that they definitely want you to think is not actually an amnesty. 20 Republicans so far have joined in as co-sponsors on the bill, betraying the agenda of the Trump administration and the will of the electorate.

…. The first big hint that this bill is bad news is the fact that the official name of it is the "DIGNIDAD" act. Opting for the Spanish version of "dignity" is pretty much just a big middle finger to anyone who is truly concerned about border security.

The bill's Republican co-sponsor is Florida Rep. María Elvira Salazar. Earlier in the week, Rep. Salazar got into an online argument over the true nature of the bill with Texas Republican Rep. Brandon Gill, which my Townhall colleague Amy Curtis covered. Salazar was very confrontational and condescending to Gill, telling him to read the bill before he opened his mouth. Someone took her up on the challenge, which Amy shared in her post:

Pages 162-170... The Dream Act: You grant conditional lawful permanent resident status to ILLEGAL ALIENS who:

>Have been continuously present in the U.S. since January 1, 2021

>Entered before age 18

>Meet education, employment, or military service requirements

>Pass criminal background checks On top of this, in Sec. 2102(b)(3)(B), DACA recipients get fast-tracked to conditional green card status. ...which is literally mass amnesty

BUT THE BILL GOES EVEN FURTHER!!!

On pages 204-217, you present the Dignity Program: This is a separate track for illegal aliens who don't qualify for the Dream Act. If you are an illegal aliens who:

> Was continuously present since December 31, 2020

>Pay a $1,000 upfront "restitution" fee

>Submit biometrics, pass a background check

>No felony convictions You get work authorization + travel authorization + deferred removal for 7 years After completing the 7-year program (paying $7,000 total in fees, staying employed, obeying laws, paying back taxes): We grant you:

> "Dignity Status" which is essentially a lawful nonimmigrant status, which is renewable any number of times

>Work and travel authorization But the most important bit that you're hiding here is that it totally suspends deportation of anyone who qualifies for this. This would effective end ALL MASS DEPORTATIONS in the United States immediately.

UPDATE, Courtesy of Burning Madolf — it also includes a lawyers’ relief provision (of course it does):

Now multiply by 50 (UPDATED — yet another program's fraud revealed)

Stephen Green: FRAUD ALL THE WAY DOWN:

The most connected hospice doctor in California.

A CBS News Investigation found one Los Angeles County hospice physician’s name, Dr. Rajiv Bhuva, on Medicare claims for nearly 2,800 patients across 126 California hospices in 2024, according to the last full year of available data.

There are roughly 1,800 licensed hospices in Los Angeles County. Federal and state data show 742 of them — about 42% — have multiple indicators of fraud, as defined by the state of California.

No doctor in California is connected to more hospices than Dr. Rajiv Bhuva. In 2024, his name appeared on Medicare claims across 126 hospice companies in California — 115 of them in Los Angeles County alone.

Much more at the link.

UPDATE: California Home Care Cash — $25 billion to fraudsters, and accelerating.

Who'd have thunk it?

San Francisco Solved Its Crime Problem With This 1 Weird Trick

For those short on time: recalled the Soros-prosecutor, and elected someone who arrest and prosecute criminals.

…. In just two years, car break-ins are down 85% from their previous highs. Robbery is down 30%. Burglary is down 33%. And most impressive of all, homicides haven't been this low since 1954. To give you an idea of how long ago 1954 was in San Francisco terms, the city was on its fourth in a string of five consecutive Republican mayors.

The real question, though, is, "In two years since what?"

In 2022, voters finally had it up to here [hold hand six inches above head for visual effect] with the city's soft-on-crime/George-Soros-sponsored district attorney, Chesa Boudin, and recalled him with a solid 55% majority. Mayor London Breed appointed Brooke Jenkins to the job as Boudin's interim D.A., and she was elected to a full term in 2024.

Jenkins has her own troubles, including committing two acts of prosecutorial misconduct, resulting in her placement in a mandatory diversion program to teach her the errors of her ways.

But there's one thing Jenkins does exactly right, and it's that one weird trick that works so well against crime: She actually prosecutes criminals. 

Jenkins isn't shy about it, either. She speaks loudly about bringing criminals to justice, and she carries a big prosecutorial stick.

All since 2024, when Jenkins and SFPD made big changes.

More from A.J.: "In 2024, SF activated 400 license plate readers and deployed 80 drones citywide. This tech feeds officers live intelligence on suspects in motion. Drones alone have assisted in 1,000+ arrests since then. The technology lets authorities solve crimes as they happen rather than depend on much more intensive, legally perilous post hoc investigations (which ironically are often more intrusive than using tech)."

The results speak for themselves, and the city is at least somewhat more livable again.