NYC moves to stop Uber, Lyft. Very little sympathy here

De Blasio and his City Council freeze permits, regulate taxi competitors. It strikes me that most Uber drivers trend left, so they have this coming. When the story hit the news recently of an Uber driver kicking three (black, if that matters) Trump supporters out of his car, I was going to point out that we're the people defending the right of independent contractors to compete against unions and the governmental authorities that seek to regulate them, but I figured that the deluded fools would soon discover the truth.

Now they have, and they ain't seen nothing yet. 

So screw 'em.

No real estate news, so let's talk politics

There as a large ($8 million) sale on N. Maple yesterday, which I'll post on shortly, but otherwise we're mostly seeing rentals at this end if the summer. But if real estate is dormant, (some) brains aren't, and I highly recommend this essay,  "Purity Spirals into Evil". Excerpts below, but you should really read the entire thing. It offers an expiation of how we've moved from smokestack scrubbers in the 1970s to plastic straw bans in 2018, from #Metoo allegations of rape to  firing professors for a single, harmless joke about lingerie, and more importantly, and to get to the heart of the matter, the complete rejection of Western civilization as a culture based on a cesspool of white, male oppression. 

"If you analyze tyrannical ideologies and the sort of mass mob insanity behind them, you will see a common thread: purity. Nazis obsessed over purity of race. Stalinists obsessed over purity of political beliefs. Jihadists obsess over purity of religious belief. But purity is always there. And purity can twist good into evil, or render a lesser evil into a far greater evil.

What is purity? The dictionary tells us that it is “freedom from adulteration or contamination.” For our purposes, we may use the synonym ‘perfection’ with some utility. The point of purity is to identify impurities and eradicate them. The Nazi will eradicate the racially impure, the Communist will eradicate the impure Capitalists, and so on.

The utility of quests for purity to a tyrant should be obvious. For what is more impure than man? A quest for purity is carte blanche for never ending power over others. Progressivism itself admits this even in the content of its own name. Progress toward what? Purity. Progress toward the perfect society, in which poverty, disease, war, and a thousand other such ills have been eradicated.

Never will you hear the Progressive say “this is good enough, we can stop now.” For them, there is always a new impurity to eradicate. The movement is like the terminator of movie fame:

Kyle Reese: Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

Social Justice is like the terminator in other ways, too. It cloaks itself as one of us. It wears the skin of our institutions in an effort to disguise itself. But always, its mission is to eradicate us. We are the impure. We cannot be permitted to exist.

And when a round of impure are disposed of, new impure are found. Today, it is Rightists. Tomorrow, Centrists. The day after that, Trotskyite Leftists. The terminator never stops. Ever-greater demands of purity are made. Like the Third Reich, the gas chambers never stop. The ash falls from the skies, forever. At least until someone puts a stop to it all at gunpoint.

Purity spirals work so well because fault can always be found with man. Every single human being in the history of our species, save one, has done wrong; has sinned. We all deserve death. That is a fundamental tenet of Christianity. It is also true even if you are the most ardent of atheists. Man is imperfect. And so it will ever be.

Yet, is it the SJW’s responsibility to act as the judge, jury, and executioner? Shall the Nazi do it? Shall the Stalinist? The Jihadist? Not only is there no one among us who could ever make demands of purity upon us, these cretins are the worst of the worst, the most evil among us. And it is they who always lead the charge to purity. The nuts are running the nuthouse.

Rationalizations always exist for why we are bad people. Why we should be punished, why we should give up everything, why we shouldn’t even exist. ALWAYS. Here we are, in America, the most prosperous nation to have ever existed in the history of our species. This is a place where starvation is virtually unknown. Where even the poorest among us possess wonders. And yet our debate constantly shifts toward America as an unjust nation that loves reducing its citizens to poverty, as if we were like Somalia or Haiti. Similar arguments are made for racism, sexism, homophobia, etc…

There are some poor people in America (though they do better here than in most places), thus we are impure. And in the minds of the purity-seekers, this means there is no fundamental difference between us and Haiti. Disagree? You want to push granny off a cliff, you Nazi! Ironic, I think, that the Left names us the Nazis when the modern purity-seekers are almost invariably Leftists.

Purity spirals are how evil manifests itself in its most concentrated human form. It is where humans go collectively insane, where they can rationalize the most hateful and destructive things. When the SJW says that you are a racist for X, he is almost always saying you are impure. They even police their own, thusly. They are always on the lookout for manifestations of impurity even among their own. They are political cannibals, as purists necessarily must be.

[snip]

That’s what our conflict is all about, underneath it all. Purity, and those who use purity as an excuse for tyranny. Far from being the good guys, they are the most evil among us (though we all have at least some evil in us). Far from being those who will usher in an age of peace, love, and tolerance, they are those who will usher in an age of death, war, hatred, and intolerance.

It is always this way with them. When they call you a Nazi, remember that though they have little or no political connection with them, their underlying drive for purity means that, of all modern political ideologies, they (and perhaps the Jihadists) most closely resemble the behavior patterns of Nazis. For all of them are, like the Nazis and Stalinists before them, seekers of power through purity spirals."

Microsoft News, "Trusted news from the world's best journalists", claims that those filthy Jews, the Rothschilds are sitting on 700 trillion bucks.

That would be three times the world's total estimated wealth, combined, but is there anything those Jews can't, and won't do to hide their perfidy? 

 

The world's richest families' staggering wealth

Rothschild family: net worth estimated at up to $700 trillion

One of the wealthiest and most influential families in the world, the banking dynasty was founded in the 1760s. Because the family’s wealth is private, it’s difficult to ascertain its net worth – estimates range all the way up to a staggering $700 trillion, split between legions of descendants. The philanthropic clan has interests in real estate, art and wine.

It astonished me when it sold for $3.850 in 2003, and it continues to surprise me now

14 mountain wood.jpg

14 Mountain Wood Drive, currently asking $3.485 (down from its original March, 2017 asking price of $4.495) finally reports a contract. I didn't understand that 2003 purchase price for this nondescript, 1977 house, and notwithstanding the current owners expanding it by a third and renovating all of it, I still don't get it. 

De gustibus non est disputandum

circa 2018

circa 2018

And what it looked like in 2003, when it sold for $3.850 million. Go figure.

And what it looked like in 2003, when it sold for $3.850 million. Go figure.

Almost a year ago, after he'd taken yet another price cut, I warned the then-listing agent that he'd misstaged it, but he ignored my advice.

Screen Shot 2018-08-06 at 11.44.56 AM.png

Virtue signalling in Greenwich also means control of the masses. "We Have to Regulate Every Aspect of People's Lives"

A local Greenwich advocacy group, having managed to solve the non-existent problem of plastic shopping bags, has turned its attention to the latest media craze, the plastic drinking straw, a national frenzy that uses a figure of 500 million discarded straws a day — a statistic arrived at by a 9-year-old boy doing a school paper. I kid you not. 

There's been plenty of debunking of this latest hysteria (including the fact that the U.S. generates 1% of the world's plastic waste, while 90% of the plastic that's ending up in our oceans comes from just 10 rivers in the world, all of which serve as sewers for the poorest cities in Africa and Asia), but to virtue signalers, that's irrelevant: it's all about establishing moral authority over the little people. And, of course, shining a golden glow on their own purity and, as one of them puts it, "forward thinking".

“What does your town want to be? Taking a chance of polluting your environment? Or forward thinking and innovative? When the whole world is addressing plastic pollution, why wouldn’t Greenwich be right up there, too?” asked Jeanine Behr Getz of BYO.

Here's what's really behind the attitude and ambition of this crowd:

In Santa Barbara, where that city just enacted its own ban on plastic straws, a councilman gave the game way for himself, and like-minded people, including those here in Greenwich.

A little noticed detail in Santa Barbara’s recent drive to criminalize plastic straws, which culminated in the Santa Barbara city council taking testimony from a nine-year-old about the planetary menace, has come to light in recent days. During that council session, councilman Jesse Dominguez said the following in response to citizens who asked “what’s next?”:

“Unfortunately, common sense is just not common. We have to regulate every aspect of people’s lives.”

Just out of curiosity, I looked up the addresses of two of these social justice warriors and, not surprisingly, they turn out to live in two very comfortable, spacious homes, neither of which would seem likely to be candidates for "low carbon footprint" awards.

One is 4,785 sq.ft., 3 acres in the R-2 zone, oil heat, with an in ground pool; estimated vale, $3.5 million (it's located in an area of town that's seen some severe drops in value in recent years — judging from other details available on the Internet, the lady and her husband can take the hit). The other advocate's home is larger: 9, 800 square feet, hot tub and spa in addition to the mandatory pool, six bedrooms, 7 1/2 baths. Estimated value, $5.5 million.

I don't begrudge these ladies their homes — who doesn't wish to live in a nice house? — but I do resent a couple of very wealthy women instructing the rest of us to do without, as they term it, "convenience" so that they can position themselves as leaders of the new order. If they wish to eliminate convenience, for instance, maybe they should stop heating their pools, fill them in, and bicycle down to the new Byram Pool to join the equally-inconvenienced proletariat on hot summer days.

People who live in stone mansions shouldn't throw plastic straws at the rest of us simply to show that "they care".

OMG, my grandfather dated a cultural approrpriater!

Plucked eyebrows are now considered to be the exclusive property of Mexican Americans.

According to a piece in Marie Claire, deciding to pluck your eyebrows so that they are very thin is “problematic” and “cultural appropriation.”

The author, Krystyna Chávez, explained that she was absolutely horrified when she saw a photo of Rihanna with skinny eyebrows.

“When I saw Rihanna on the cover of British Vogue this week with a set of ultra-skinny brows, my immediate reaction was, ‘Wait, WTF?’” Chávez writes in a piece titled “I’m Latina, and I Find Rihanna’s Skinny Brows Problematic.” “Why is Rihanna wearing chola brows?”

“Considering it was highly unlikely that Rihanna had suddenly joined a gang, and seeing as the Caribbean singer wasn’t exactly raised on the streets of East L.A., my Mexican-American heart was deeply confused, and deeply annoyed,” Chávez continued.

About as asinine, ignorant and arrogant as modern-day blacks appropriating dreadlocks as their own, despite a history of braided hair dating as far back to 3,600 B.C..

dreadlock.jpg

The pervert should have restricted his activities to Target's former ladies rooms

One Jorge Iberra caught snapping pictures up teens' skirts while they shopped at Target. Target, you may remember, just last year opened its female bathrooms to all men, just so long as they "identified" as women. "Nothing to worry about", it assured its customers. Under Target's new rules, Iberra could not have been prevented from entering the bathroom, or using a stall and staying there, unless and until he was caught using his camera.

Target may soon find itself as uncomfortable as Planet Fitness,which just suffered an appellate court decision allowing a woman to sue the company for not informing its female members that they would henceforth be showering with naked men brandishing penises.

Onward and upward.

This latest price cut might do it: we'll see

hillside.jpg

10 Hillside Drive — the other Hillside Drive; this one's in Rock Ridge — has dropped to $4.950 million. A 1905 mansion, reasonably updated, on 2 acres within easy walking distance of Greenwich Avenue, yet it offers another example of overpricing when first starting off in an attempt to sell a house.

Back in 2011 I had a client who very much wanted an older house in this neighborhood, and she was struck by this one when we toured it. But it needed too much work to justify its then-price tag of $6.395, so  we moved on. Chalk up one lost sale.

The new price of $5 million might have made this property attractive back then, but after sitting unloved on the market for seven years, can you blame a buyer for hesitating at buying a house no-one else has wanted, for years?

All that said, Rock Ridge is a great, expensive neighborhood, so it wouldn't surprise me if a buyer who loves old homes decides to take a chance and grab this at, say, $4.5ish?