Nursery rhymes for children and gullible citizens

Biden-Harris Program Meant To Greenify Low-Income Homes is Mismanaged and Vulnerable to Fraud, Inspector General Warns

16 states and territories have yet to complete a single project

The Biden-Harris administration's $3.5 billion initiative to "weatherize" low-income homes through climate-friendly and energy-efficient upgrades is being mismanaged and is vulnerable to "fraud, waste, and abuse," according to a top government watchdog.

In a report published late Tuesday, the Department of Energy's inspector general found that 11 states receiving funds under the agency's Weatherization Assistance Program blew past the legal limit of per unit cost while 21 states and territories did not submit legally required quarterly reports detailing progress on time. Another 16 states and territories have received federal funding to weatherize more than 52,000 units but have yet to complete a single project with that funding.

"This lack of performance is a red flag that warrants immediate department attention," the inspector general wrote in the report sent to Department of Energy leadership last week.

The apparent mismanagement of the program is the latest black eye for the Biden-Harris administration's efforts to fund a wide range of green energy programs as part of its aggressive climate agenda. Weatherization has been singled out by the administration as a "critical" tool for combating global warming, with Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm recently stating the program would ensure all Americans have access to "clean energy tools."

The report also comes after the EPA's inspector general conducted multiple investigations into the Clean School Bus Program, finding that that program is similarly falling short of oversight requirements.

Funding for both the Weatherization Assistance Program and Clean School Bus Program was earmarked under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law in November 2021.

That law and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act earmarked hundreds of billions of dollars for climate programs, which the administration has raced to get out the door in recent months, ahead of the upcoming election, the Associated Press reported.

According to the inspector general report published Tuesday, federal statute sets a limit of $8,497 per unit that state and local governments are allowed to spend weatherizing homes. The 11 states that exceeded that limit exceeded it by at least 50 percent, with New York spending $32,551 per unit and Alaska spending a staggering $93,588 per unit.

"The fact that the metrics are so far above the threshold warrants additional scrutiny by federal project managers, which is difficult to do if required reports are not submitted in a timely manner," the report stated, noting the 21 states and territories that failed to submit quarterly performance reports on time.

Among the 16 states and territories that haven't completed a single weatherization project under the program are Ohio, which was awarded funding for 12,510 projects, and California, which was awarded funding for 8,519 projects. Those plans were approved by the Department of Energy in mid-2023.

"We have known that all the green spending that passed through Congress was nothing but an enormous slush fund," said Daniel Turner, the executive director of energy advocacy group Power the Future. "There's no accountability into any of this green slush fund or how it is spent. It's allocated based upon political agenda."

"Whether it's environmental justice, whether it's weatherization of low-income housing, the metric of success is spending money—not the effectiveness of these programs," Turner continued.

The Weatherization Assistance Program, which was first created in the 1970s, has historically been a much smaller-scale program—its fiscal year 2022 budget was $313 million. In other words, the infrastructure bill increased the size of the program by more than 1,000 percent by adding $3.5 billion to its budget.

The Department of Energy's watchdog said that, prior to the massive infusion of new funding, the program already had "a history of both fraud and internal control problems."

Further, the inspector general made a series of recommendations for the agency to tighten up its oversight of the program in the report. The watchdog also took the uncommon step of announcing a new "oversight campaign" to more thoroughly investigate the program at the grantee and subgrantee level, focusing on "eligibility, activities allowed and not allowed, compliance with cost principles, reporting, subrecipient monitoring, and other risk areas."

Department of Energy principal deputy director Keishaa Austin said the agency concurred with the inspector general's findings and that it would pursue the recommendations outlined in the report. The department declined to comment further.

Do you remember this gem from 2013? There’s still no fat in our budget, no waste, nothing to cut.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi: Nothing left to cut in budget — ‘the cupboard is bare’

By David Eldridge - The Washington Times - Sunday, September 22, 2013

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says Republican-led efforts to rein in government spending are pointless because there is nothing left to cut in the almost $4 trillion-a-year federal budget.

“The cupboard is bare. There’s no more cuts to make. It’s really important that people understand that,” Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, said in an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“We cannot have cuts just for the sake of cuts.”

The federal budget has doubled in size in 12 years, from $1.9 trillion in 2001 to $3.8 trillion this year.

Federal budget, 2023-24 is now $6.752 trillion. Not a penny of waste, not a dollar to cut.

A (token) price cut on Sandy Lane

6 Sandy Lane hit the market last July at $2.8 million and 96 days later has dropped that 3.6% to $2.7. The same house failed to sell in 2019 at a price that ranged from $2 million to $1.750, and even though nothing has been done to improve it since then, it’s not unreasonable to think that its market value must have increased during the last five years. And it probably has, just not by a million dollars.

Trusted servants of the State

WASHINGTON — The FBI warned major US tech companies ahead of The Post’s first reports on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 that Russian agents were preparing a strikingly similar document dump — and once the scoop materialized, Facebook executives discussed calibrating censorship decisions to please what they assumed would be an incoming Biden-Harris administration, a congressional investigation found.

The new details — contained in an interim report by the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on the weaponization of government — are emerging as former President Donald Trump leads in polls ahead of the Nov. 5 election and as his allies urge a house-cleaning at the FBI and possible new regulations or antitrust actions to punish and restrain platforms like Facebook.

“FBI tipped us all off last week that this Burisma story was likely to emerge,” an unidentified Microsoft employee wrote on Oct. 14, 2020, the day The Post published the first in a series of bombshell stories on the Biden family’s foreign dealings, according to the congressional report.

Internal Facebook communications, including a chat log, show that employees quickly discounted The Post’s reporting because it was the “[e]xact content expected for hack and leak.”

“Right on schedule,” another Facebook employee concurred.

“Obviously, our calls on this could colour [sic] the way an incoming Biden administration views us more than almost anything else…,” Facebook’s then-vice president of global affairs Nick Clegg wrote on the same day to vice president of global public policy Joel Kaplan.

The Post spent nearly a month verifying the authenticity of laptop files ahead of their publication, though it’s unclear to what extent the FBI was aware of that work as it prepared its prebuttal.

The FBI has possessed Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop since December 2019 and knew that files cited by The Post in its coverage came from a Delaware computer repairman and not the Kremlin — but, after preemptively discrediting the world exclusive to Big Tech, the FBI kept silent publicly as 51 ex-intelligence officials suggested and then-candidate Joe Biden outright alleged that the files came from Russia.

The Post’s reporting showed that Biden, while vice president, interacted with international business associates of his son Hunter and brother James — including in countries where he helped steer US policy, such as China and Ukraine.

The reports were widely, if belatedly, corroborated by other news outlets and the files were even used by federal prosecutors in court — but only after Biden defeated Trump in November 2020 by narrow swing-state margins, which some Republicans say was in part due to the cloud of suspicion over the laptop.

Never forget Schumer’s warning, but if you do, don’t worry: there will be new examples to jog your memory, very soon.

"You take on the intelligence community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So, even for a practical supposedly hard-nosed businessman he's being really dumb to do it."

The Voice of Mt. Trashmore

February 16, 2021

Trash Crisis Leaves Puerto Rico Near ‘the Brink’

Most of Puerto Rico’s landfills fail to meet federal standards and are almost full. Residents and experts worry that trash will soon overwhelm the region.

Calling half the electorate Nazis, racists, and garbage hasn’t proved a winning tactic in the past, but it does make clear what these people think of the people they want to rule.