Because the point of all these poverty plans is graft for politicians and their friends, not actual results

/

still with us

The same can be said for government agencies and programs that claim to address the global warming hysteria, education, agriculture, military preparedness, space exploration ….

The cities are no better: in 2016, LA soaked its taxpayers $1.2 billion to pay for 10,000 new units of bum housing; by 2020 only 278 units had been built, to the tune of $563,000 per apartment.

LA's Homeless Housing Now Costs More Than Some Luxury Condos

And that hasn’t improved by 2024 — quite the opposite, in fact:

LA’s latest homeless housing project, at nearly $600K a unit, opens in Skid Row

Proponents hope the first of two high-rises, dubbed Weingart Towers, will be a model to follow

According to his PR flak,

Mayor Garcetti has stepped up with our State and County partners to house thousands of our homeless neighbors at an unprecedented rate. And we will use the model we've built to house thousands more in the coming months. The Mayor will always keep pushing to create more shelter capacity, so that we can bring unhoused Angelenos indoors right now. While we do that, we must also keep our focus on building permanent supportive and affordable housing as cost-efficiently as possible .…”

Sure, the government could help young families buy their first house (not that that’s a good idea), but they can figure out a way to do that without others being taxed to pay for that assistance. On the other hand, the gentleman below has absolutely no hope of ever becoming a useful member of society, let alone a taxpayer, and therefore he’s more deserving, no?

Finally

/

23 Pleasant Street, Riverside, (link fixed now) currently priced at $1.995 million, has a contract after several lengthy stays on the market. It asked for the same $1.995 million in 2018 and eventually dropped to $1.895 before the listing was allowed to expire at the end of that year. It came back in 2019 at $1.595 dropped to $1.495, and again expired, in December 2020.

So it took a hiatus until March of this year and lo, the Riverside market has improved, so even though it was priced all the way back to its unsuccessful 2018 price of $1.995, it has found a buyer.

A vey nice house inside, but it lacks a garage, and Pleasant Street itself was probably so-named by its developer to disguise the fact that it is immediately adjacent to I-95: “Who ya gonna believe, the sign post or your own lyin’ ears?”

Alas for Cornell's Gender Queer Studies Program graduates and their peers, relief from their feckless borrowing has arrived too late

/

chumps

Biden's Last Gasp Effort to Forgive Student Loans Is Just as Illegal as All His Other Attempts

Give Joe Biden credit for his inventiveness in violating the law regarding student loan debt. Courts at every level have declared his efforts to forgive student loan debt as unconstitutional. And yet, he keeps flogging the issue.

It's like this: Democrats are the party of elitists. College-educated voters under 35 have abandoned the GOP and flocked to the Democratic Party. A lot of those voters carry student debt that they're either behind in paying or are having trouble keeping up with.

The pandemic was the killer. The student loan repayment "pause" lasted three years and when it restarted, about half of the 43 million student loan borrowers were in arrears of one kind or another.

Absolutely no one is surprised at that. Indeed, Biden tried to use the pandemic as a springboard to forgive all student loan debt. It didn't work. With the Supreme Court decision last year striking down Biden's plan to forgive half a trillion dollars in student debt, he was forced to implement his plan in bite-sized chunks rather than forcing the American taxpayer to eat the big enchilada.

With Biden's exit from the White House imminent, the president decided to make one more grandiose gesture to pander to his student loan base. He revealed a set of rules that would grant "hardship" exemptions to 8 million borrowers. He's going to try to do it by changing the definition of "hardship"

"If these rules are finalized as proposed," reads an Oct. 25 press release, "the Secretary of Education could waive up to the entire outstanding balance of a student loan when the Department determines a hardship is likely to impair the borrower's ability to fully repay the loan or render the costs of continued collection of the loan unjustified." ….

But this will give the gender benders the sads:

Adam Looney, the Executive Director of the Marriner S. Eccles Institute at the University of Utah and a visiting fellow at Brookings, is dubious about Biden having enough time to implement the new plan. "It seems like it's hard to imagine that there is enough time," says Looney. "And even if it did go into effect…I assume the Trump administration could stop it very quickly."

There will be a 30-day comment period, after which the Education Department hopes to finalize the rule in 2025. Obviously, that will be too late. The incoming Trump administration isn't likely to allow the program to continue. In fact, there's worry among some debt forgiveness advocates that Trump will erase all of Biden's loan forgiveness programs and force people to pay what they owe.

In many ways, the Trump administration could upend Biden’s student loan policies without having to do much. Several key policies are tied up in litigation, and the new administration could simply choose to stop defending them.

“Some of the first victories for the new administration’s education policy may be just them sitting on their hands and waiting for some of these policies that never were legal in the first place to be struck down by the courts,” said Michael Brickman, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.