"Journalism"

Oh, the horror! Oh, the darkness! Oh, the humanity!

What these mewling reporters and their editors don’t understand is that the majority of Americans think all this is a GOOD thing; scare headlines and purple prose don’t work when the effect is to reassure the people that the man they elected to do this is on the job and working hard. If taking down 8,000 web pages devoted to gay transvestites and child mutilation will “plunge the (former) government into darkness”, then we can, and will, cheer all the harder. More of this, please, and faster.

Trump successfully plunges government into darkness as 8,000 DEI web pages stripped from internet

More than 8,000 web pages from across the government have been taken down as President Donald Trump demands the federal workforce comply with his new orders destroying diversity, gender and equality initiatives.

Many of the webpages contained information about 'climate' initiatives or 'transgender' care. 

Trump's order has seen web pages from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Census Bureau, the Food and Drug Administration, the Justice Department, the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Veterans Affairs and many more agencies go dark, a New York Times analysis found. 

'CDC's website is being modified to comply with President Trump's Executive Orders,' it says at the top of one of its pages. 

'Sorry — we can't find that page,' reads one web page that is supposed to outline LGBTQ veteran care. 

The pages appear to be related to Trump's executive order, which had a 5 pm Friday deadline,  to terminate any programs that promote 'gender ideology.'

It's unclear if the pages will be returned with edits or have been permanently banished to the darkness of the web.

For a time on Friday evening, the entire Census.gov website returned an error message. Many pages have returned online but its page on sexual orientation and gender identity was still down.

The scrubs come after the Office of Personnel Management sent a two-page memo Wednesday demanding all heads of government agencies comply with measures to end diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

That memo laid out 'steps to end federal funding of gender ideology.' 

The included the order to 'take down all outward facing media (websites, social media accounts, etc.) that inculcate or promote gender ideology.' 

Trump also ordered federal employees to remove their pronouns from their email signatures. 

And he required all federal agencies to 'recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically male.'  

As part of that order, Secretary of State Marco Rubio suspended passport applications that use a gender-neutral marker such as 'X.'

When asked Friday about the removal of 'DEI' information from websites, Trump said, 'It doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. DEI would have ruined our country, and now it's dead.'

It shouldn't cost a dime, because no one in West Virgina earns enough to owe income taxes anyway

Trump health aide's radical plan to bribe fat hillbillies into slimming down

Obese Americans should have their taxes written off if they slim down to a healthy weight, according to a bold new plan by a former Trump health official.

Robert P Charrow, former general counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) during the first Trump term, is calling on the new administration to trial the plan in West Virginia.

The [Big Rock Candy] Mountain State has some of the highest rates of chronic diseases linked to obesity and therefore sucks the most money from federally-funded taxpayer programs like Medicaid. 

Writing for the health website STAT News, Charrow said that if West Virginia reduced its obesity rate down from 40 to 25 percent - the same as America's leanest state, Colorado - then no one in the state should 'have to pay individual federal income tax for up to five years.'

UPDATE: Or we could just (also?) eliminate the Food Stamp program, as suggested by Publius in the comments sections. We’d save even more.

And the Trumpster keeps rolling along

“It is mine, I tell you. My own. My precious. Yes, my precious.”

Tale of the Dark Money

this ad is disinformation in itself

Probably too long to read in its entirety — and at that, I’ve edited it severely — but the article below gives a good idea of what’s been going on with the anonymous far-left dark money groups as they’ve grown over the past decades. There’s much more on thios subject on the web, including a discussion of Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life, the group that’s infiltrated Greenwich’s voting system.

InfluenceWatch details just one dark money umbrella organization, as an example:

Arabella Advisors

Managed Funds:

New Venture Fund

Windward Fund

Sixteen Thirty Fund

Hopewell Fund

North Fund

Impetus Fund

Arabella Advisors (commonly called “Arabella”) is a philanthropic consulting company that guides the strategy, advocacy, impact investing, and management for high-dollar left-leaning nonprofits and individuals. 1 Arabella provides these clients with a number of services that ease their operations and that enable them to enact policies focused on environmentalism and other left-of-center issues. 1 The company was founded in 2005 by Eric Kessler, a Clinton administration alumnus and long-time staffer at the League of Conservation Voters. 2

Arabella Advisors manages six nonprofits that serve as incubators and accelerators for a range of other left-of-center nonprofits: the New Venture Fund, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Hopewell Fund, the Windward Fund, the North Fund, and the Impetus Fund.

These nonprofits have collectively hosted hundreds of left-wing policy and advocacy organizations since the network’s creation (referred to by critics as “pop-up groups” because they are little more than websites.) 3 4

The North Fund, is significantly funded by Arabella’s nonprofits, housed at the company’s address, and pays Arabella Advisors consulting fees. 5 According to a job listing posted on LinkedIn in November 2022 for the position of “Senior Vice President (SVP), Managed Organizations” 6 with the company, Arabella describes its nonprofits as “Managed Organizations” 6 and seems to describe the relationship between them and the organization as a “heavily matrixed working environment.” 6

In 2020, Arabella’s nonprofit network boasted total revenues exceeding $1.67 billion and total expenditures of $1.26 billion, and paid out $896 million in grants largely to other left-leaning and politically active nonprofits. 7 In 2019, Arabella’s nonprofits reported combined revenues of $731 million. 8

Altogether, between 2006 and 2020 Arabella’s network reported total revenues of $4.7 billion and total expenditures of $3.3 billion. 9 A January 2020 profile of Arabella Advisors’ network by Inside Philanthropy noted that the company “handles over $400 million in philanthropic investments and advises on several billion dollars in overall resources.” 10

These funds originate primarily with major left-of-center foundations and individual donors, not with the company Arabella Advisors, and are controlled by the nonprofits, which in turn “hire” Arabella Advisors to consult in exchange for a fee. Many of Arabella’s top officials, including firm founder Eric Kessler and former managing director Bruce Boyd, are current or former principal officers on the nonprofits’ boards of directors. 11 Between 2008 and 2021, Arabella’s nonprofits paid the company a combined total of at least $230 million in contracting and management services fees. 12

Arabella’s nonprofit network has implemented over 300 different “pop-up” projects targeting a range of issues, including net neutrality, free speech, abortion access, Obamacare, and President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees, and was highly active in funding pro-Democratic Party advertisements in the 2018 and 2020 elections. Its groups were also active in trying to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Census in left-leaning states and the subsequent 2021-22 redistricting process, when state legislative and congressional districts were redrawn by state legislatures. 13 14 15 Multiple former Arabella employees have also been traced to the Biden administration. 16

Arabella Advisors specifically highlights projects in which it has helped its clients divest millions of dollars from traditional energy companies, invest in risky experimental companies, boycott the historically Republican-leaning U.S. Chamber of Commerce, enact a ballot initiative that freed 4,000 criminals in California, and lobby for a labor union-friendly policy in Oregon that was supported by the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), Service Employees International Union (SEIU), and the Oregon Nurses Association. 17

Arabella and its nonprofit network have been criticized as “dark money” funders both for channeling hundreds of millions of dollars from left-leaning foundations to left-wing organizations and for hosting hundreds of “pop-up groups”—websites designed to look like standalone nonprofits that are really projects of an Arabella-run nonprofit. 18 However, Arabella’s nonprofit network also manages a number of “philanthropic projects” engaged in genuine charity, not political advocacy. 10

In April 2021, the New York Times criticized Arabella’s “system of political financing, which often obscures the identities of donors,” as “dark money,” calling the network “a leading vehicle for it on the Left.” 19

In November 2019, Politico criticized the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the 501(c)(4) advocacy wing of Arabella’s nonprofit network, as a “little-known,” “massive ‘dark money’ group [that] boosted Democrats” in the 2018 midterm elections with $140 million. “The money contributed to efforts ranging from fighting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and other Trump judicial nominees to boosting ballot measures raising the minimum wage and changing laws on voting and redistricting in numerous states,” the left-leaning website reported. Politico also noted that Sixteen Thirty Fund’s biggest single donation (made anonymously) was for $51.7 million, “more than the group had ever raised before in an entire year before President Donald Trump was elected,” adding that “the group’s 2018 fundraising surpassed any amount ever raised by a left-leaning political nonprofit.” 20 However, Politico failed to fully connect the Sixteen Thirty Fund to Arabella Advisors’ nonprofit network.

The left-leaning Washington Post further criticized Arabella’s Sixteen Thirty Fund as a “big campaign donor” in a November 24, 2019 opinion by the editorial board, which called on Congress to change nonprofit disclosure laws, noting in particular a $26.7 million anonymous donation to the Fund. 21 However, the Post also failed to connect the Sixteen Thirty Fund to Arabella Advisors and its other three nonprofits.

In a November 24, 2019 letter to the editor published by the Washington Post, Capital Research Center (CRC) president Scott Walter identified the $26.7 million donation as originating with the New Venture Fund, the largest of Arabella’s in-house nonprofits, and confirmed Politico’s suspicion that the Sixteen Thirty Fund is “part of a larger network of dark money.” 22

In 2021, The Atlantic called Arabella’s network “the massive progressive dark-money group you’ve never heard of” and Arabella Advisors the network’s “mothership,” adding: “Democrats have quietly pulled ahead of Republicans in untraceable political spending. One group helped make it happen.” In the Atlantic’s interview with Arabella’s then-CEO Sampriti Ganguli it called the Sixteen Thirty Fund “the indisputable heavyweight of Democratic dark money” which funneled “roughly $61 million of effectively untraceable money to progressive causes,” making it the “second-largest super-PAC donor in 2020.” 23

“Dark Money” Criticism

Arabella and its nonprofit network have been criticized as “dark money” funders both for channeling hundreds of millions of dollars to left-wing organizations and for hosting hundreds of “pop-up groups”—websites designed to look like standalone nonprofits that are really projects of an Arabella-run nonprofit. 18 38

In April 2021, the New York Times criticized Arabella’s “system of political financing, which often obscures the identities of donors,” as “dark money,” calling the network “a leading vehicle for it on the Left.” 19 In May 2021, the New York Times criticized Arabella’s New Venture Fund and its 501(c)(4) “sister” nonprofit, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, for their close ties to and funding from the foreign-funded Wyss Foundation, calling Sixteen Thirty Fund one of the “leading dark money spenders on the Left” responsible for distributing more than $63 million in super PAC donations that hurt Republicans and aided Democrats in the 2020 election, as well for “help[ing] create and fund dozens of groups, including some that worked to block Mr. Trump’s nominees and push progressive appointments by Mr. Biden.” 39

In November 2019, Politico criticized the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the 501(c)(4) advocacy wing of Arabella’s nonprofit network, as a “little-known,” “massive ‘dark money’ group [that] boosted Democrats” in the 2018 midterm elections with $140 million. “The money contributed to efforts ranging from fighting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and other Trump judicial nominees to boosting ballot measures raising the minimum wage and changing laws on voting and redistricting in numerous states,” the left-leaning website reported. ….

The left-leaning Washington Post further criticized Arabella’s Sixteen Thirty Fund as a “big campaign donor” in a November 24, 2019 opinion by the editorial board, which called on Congress to change nonprofit disclosure laws, noting in particular a $26.7 million anonymous donation to the Fund. 21 However, the Post also failed to connect the Sixteen Thirty Fund to Arabella Advisors and its other three nonprofits.

Private Funding of Elections (2020)

In 2020, the Arabella-run New Venture Fund provided close to $25 million in funding to the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), a left-of-center nonprofit that passed roughly $350 million to thousands of elections offices in the form of COVID-19 “relief funds” ahead of the 2020 election, money which originated with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. 41

New Venture Fund’s grant was CTCL’s second-largest donation in 2020. 42

CTCL’s private funding of election offices was widely criticized. In January 2022, the Wall Street Journal editorial board called for the practice to banned by the states: “Zuckerbucks Shouldn’t Pay for Elections” because “it fans mistrust to let private donors fund official voting duties.” 43

Unlawful Private Funding of Elections Lawsuit (2021-2022)

Also see Center for Secure and Modern Elections (Nonprofit) and Center for Tech and Civic Life (Nonprofit)

OpenSecrets identified five Facebook pages (Colorado Chronicle, Daily CO, Nevada News Now, Silver State Sentinel, Verified Virginia) that “gave the impression of multiple free-standing local news outlets,” but are in fact “merely fictitious names used by the Sixteen Thirty Fund,” Arabella’s 501(c)(4) lobbying nonprofit. 52 These pages published Facebook political advertisements that favored Democrats and left-wing causes during the 2020 election. After the report was published a number of these pages were deleted.

States Newsroom, which runs another network of left-wing “fake news” websites, was originally created as “Newsroom Network,” a project of the Arabella-run 501(c)(3) Hopewell Fund. In June 2019, States Newsroom was spun off as an independent nonprofit with its own 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, but a number of its local affiliates are used by the Hopewell Fund as its own legal aliases. 53

While States Newsroom does not disclose its donors (and is not required to by the IRS), 51

IRS application records obtained by OpenSecrets show the States Newsroom was offered a $1 million donation from the Wyss Foundation, a private foundation primarily funded by Swiss billionaire Hansjorg Wyss, who made his fortune as CEO of a controversial medical device manufacturer called Synthes.

A financial statement in the IRS records obtained by OpenSecrets shows that the States Newsroom plans to bring in more than $27 million in contributions before the end of 2021.

And in 2018 the Hopewell Fund gave $1.72 million to News for Democracy, which OpenSecrets points out “was at the crux of a network of seemingly independent Facebook pages disguised as news outlets that started spending on digital ads in 2018,” with backing from the Sixteen Thirty Fund and Investing in US, an investment vehicle funded by LinkedIn founder and liberal billionaire Reid Hoffman. 51

Also among these “dark money” groups was ACRONYM, which raised $9.4 million from “secret donors” through April 2019, including $250,000 from Arabella’s 501(c)(3) New Venture Fund. ACRONYM is affiliated with a super PAC, PACRONYM, which spent close to $18 million aiding Democrats and hurting Republicans through independent expenditures in the 2020 election. 54 ACRONYM also owns and operates Courier Newsroom, which in turn manages a network of left-wing websites that present themselves as local news outlets while spreading “hyperlocal partisan propaganda,” according to the centrist watchdog Newsguard. 55 Courier Newsroom spent at least $20,000 in digital advertising campaigns on Facebook between March 2019 and May 2020; its total spending in Facebook ads as of June 2021 is nearly $1.4 million. 56 51

The Atlantic: Arabella’s Political Activism Masked as Philanthropy

Arabella’s increasing prominence as the head of a large and influential network of political groups has earned the company attention from both left- and right-leaning media, which respectively praise or criticize Arabella’s political activism as it exists in the guise of “philanthropy.”

InsidePhilanthropy, a left-leaning website that examines trends in charitable giving, praised Arabella Advisors founder Eric Kessler in July 2021 as one of the 100 “most powerful players in philanthropy” for aiding “progressive causes” through his nonprofit network: 57

Since he founded Arabella Advisors in 2005, Kessler has built a complex network of nonprofit funds and pass-through entities that now channel hundreds of millions toward progressive causes annually—giving that soared under Trump.

If you thought your tax dollars spent by the federal agency US Aid for International Development have been hard at work saving the Third World you're excused, but you were wrong

he’s gone, sirs, he’s gone

The Dirty Truth Behind Bill Kristol's 'Private' Funding

Stephen Green:

"Can't stop the signal," the phrase popularized in the 2005 sci-fi flick "Serenity" has today been supplanted by "Can't hide the data," courtesy of Data Republican (small-r)'s ever-improving Federal government grant award search. For example, how does a private figure like William Kristol get taxpayer money to fund his political activities?

Answer: it's complicated. But I can show you the way. 

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors received nearly $38 million in grants last year, nearly evenly divided between USAID and the State Department. Because the Rockefellers don't have enough of their own money, I suppose.

RPA gave significant sums (the Data Republican chart did not make clear how much, but I'm still digging and will update this column if I can find the number) to The Hopewell Fund. What does it do? According to its site, Hopewell has been around only since 2015 and "is a 501(c)(3) public charity that specializes in helping donors, social entrepreneurs, and other changemakers quickly launch new, innovative social change projects."

That's a whole lot of words saying not much. However, I did see that the organization's Economic Security Project provides "management for nearly a dozen contracts and grants management for community-based organizations, think tanks, advocacy organizations, and NGOs in the United States."

Slush, meet funds. Your taxpayer dollars became "private" funds via Rockefeller that then went into a whole host of progressive causes via groups like Hopewell. I'm using Hopewell as an example because one of its beneficiaries — to the tune of $2 million last year — is another organization called Defending Democracy Together.

That's one of the great mic-drop moments in social media history.

Defending Democracy's president is Bill Kristol and its directors are Mona Charen, Linda Chavez, and Sarah Longwell. Judging by Kristol's presence and its directors, Defending Democracy is essentially the nonprofit arm of Kristol's post-Weekly Standard/anti-Trump project, The Bulwark. 

Whatever it is that Defending Democracy Together does, it doesn't seem to do much of it in public. The group's website doesn't appear to have been updated since 2021. Although the Donate button seems to work. 

Honestly, Kristol is probably among the least of our problems. What, if any, influence he still has is bolstered by an amount of money that's piddling by USAID/State/NGO standards. I use him as an example only because as someone who's been around Washington and power his entire life, he's a public figure I was sure you'd be familiar with.

Following the spaghetti-like trail of money from your taxes to USAID to private groups like Kristol's was nearly impossible before Data Republican built her database. But we also have a man now on the inside, Elon Musk.

Trump agrees. "I actually checked with him a few times. Said 'Are you sure?' Yes, so we're shutting it down," Musk said.

This is vitally important.

USAID had a budget of about $50 billion in 2023, the last year for which full figures are available. While $50 billion is a drop in the bucket — it's less than 1% of federal spending — it has an outsized effect. That's billions of dollars going every year to left-wing causes (some of them dressed up as RINOs) that are too unpopular to gain private support.

It's largely NGOs, armed with your tax dollars, funding the migrant invasion, pushing gender confusion on a global scale, etc.

If Bill Kristol or whoever is behind organizations like Hopewell can raise funds privately, that's their business. But the parade of public tax dollars to private causes has to stop. 

Trumplomacy notches another win; Canada next?

we’re all friends now

Panama caves

Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino on Sunday, making it clear that the U.S. won’t tolerate China’s growing influence over the Panama Canal.

“Secretary Rubio informed President Mulino and Minister Martínez-Acha that President Trump has made a preliminary determination that the current position of influence and control of the Chinese Communist Party over the Panama Canal area is a threat to the canal and represents a violation of the Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal,” the State Department said in a statement. “Secretary Rubio made clear that this status quo is unacceptable and that absent immediate changes, it would require the United States to take measures necessary to protect its rights under the Treaty.”

The news had barely settled before another bombshell dropped: Panama has backed down. 

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino announced that after his meeting Rubio, his government will not renew its 2017 memorandum with China on the “Belt and Road Initiative.” He also stated that Panama will seek to terminate its agreements with the Chinese government ahead of their scheduled end dates in 2027 and 2028.

“One important thing, which is a decision I made and communicated to you, is that the 2017 MoU on the Silk Road, the Bell and Road Initiative, will not be renewed by my government. That is the case,” Mulino said according to a translation of his remarks.  “We are going to study the possibility of whether it can be finished earlier or not, but I think it is due for renewal in one or two years, because it is every three years. So that initiative that was signed when it was signed, at the time it was signed, will not be renewed by my government. I think "that this visit opens a path to build a new stage of relations.”

He continued, “That's how I see it, that's how I felt from Secretary Marco Rubio, and at the same time, we're trying as much as possible to increase U.S. investments in Panama. I explained to him a series of infrastructure projects that the government has in its portfolio, in the hope that they'll be aware of them and that when the time comes, the bidding process that will begin very soon will be done, so that they can get involved.”

They’re not just refusing to renew their 2017 deal with China; they’re scrambling to cut ties ahead of schedule. China’s influence over the canal is coming to an end.

I’m still not convinced that Canada can do much to harden its border that will make a significant difference, but a number of articles I’ve read since Saturday claim that Trudeau and his fellow commies are doing nothing whatsoever to stop the drugs and cartels that are operating freely in the land of the beaver, so what the heck; at the very least, it will add another knot in the media’s knickers.