It's still early days, so PJMedia’s headline seems a tad hyperbolic, but its certainly what many of us predicted would happen as these renegade judgements reached higher courts

Trump Just Got a Game-Changing Legal Victory

…. In a landmark ruling on Saturday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Trump administration a decisive legal victory—one that could fundamentally change how activist judges and forum-shopped cases interfere with executive authority. 

The appeals court's 2-1 ruling Saturday emphasized the judiciary's deference to executive authority in matters concerning federal employment and contractual decisions.

The court noted that the district court likely lacked jurisdiction to interfere with the administration's personnel actions and funding decisions, particularly regarding grant agreements with non-federal entities like Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.

[The court upheld] Trump's March 14 executive order (EO), which aimed to dismantle USAGM operations.

This ruling effectively reins in district courts that have been sidestepping proper jurisdictional channels in cases challenging Trump administration actions. The decision serves as a clear reminder that courts themselves must operate within their prescribed legal boundaries.

According to Margot Cleveland, senior legal correspondent for The Federalist, the D.C. Circuit’s ruling hinges on a critical point: jurisdiction, which has sweeping implications. As Cleveland explains, many of the legal challenges being hurled at the Trump administration involve employment decisions—precisely the kind of disputes Congress has explicitly said federal district courts have no authority to adjudicate.

The court’s decision also strikes at the heart of a broader legal strategy being used by leftist groups to stymie Trump’s reforms—namely, the claim that the administration is engaging in “wholesale dismantling” of agencies. But as the ruling makes clear, the Administrative Procedure Act was never designed to handle such broad-based political grievances, and Congress never waived sovereign immunity to allow them.

In another key point, the court found that the lower court also overstepped its bounds by trying to restore federal grants—something Congress assigned to the Court of Federal Claims, not the district courts. All told, the decision is a sharp rebuke to the legal overreach being used to obstruct the Trump administration’s agenda.

The significance of this decision extends far beyond these specific cases—it establishes clear jurisdictional parameters that could affect dozens of pending lawsuits against Trump administration policies. While the administration won't prevail in every case, this ruling suggests courts may need to more carefully consider their jurisdictional authority before issuing sweeping injunctions against executive actions.

Legal commentator Margot Cleveland has a long X thread on the decision, with much more detail:

“Maryland Man” has grown stale; meet the next media darling, “Brooklyn Man”, Señor Felix Rojas

“Hey, we do that to our idiot constituents all day, every day; not to worry”

The story of Mr. Rojas, who was caught raping a dead subway passenger “per anus and per os”, as criminal statutes would have it, received scant attention by such august news sources as the NYT: his act of depravity filling the wrong cavities was briefly reported, and then disappeared. But now that Rojas has been revealed to be an illegal alien, look for a spurt of fond, even orgasmic adoration and a flurry of visitors to his jail cell as he awaits release on no bond.

Man accused of raping corpse on New York subway train is illegal immigrant who repeatedly crossed US border


Felix Rojas, aged 44, had crossed the US-Mexico border without authorisation“on several occasions” during the 1990s, before being intercepted by Border Patrol agents and voluntarily departing, an ICE spokesperson said, according to the New York Post.

Rojas subsequently re-entered the country undetected until his arrest by NYPD on Sunday evening. The arrest was in connection with the violation of Jorge Gonzalez, a 37-year-old family man who had passed away on an R train approximately three weeks prior, officials confirmed.

A court proceeding this week revealed what Rojas allegedly did after finding Gonzalez dead or dying on a subway bench on April 8. According to prosecutors, surveillance footage shows Rojas first going through Gonzalez’s pockets to rob him, then returning to sexually assault his body. 

They said Rojas repeatedly zipped up his pants and adjusted Gonzalez’s trousers whenever the train stopped, trying to avoid being caught in the act. Prosecutors said the assault lasted over 30 minutes. Gonzalez's death was likely due to natural causes, several reports said.

Court records indicate Rojas remained present when an MTA employee discovered the body at approximately 12:25 pm. Emergency services instructed Rojas to exit the train whilst they examined Gonzalez, who was pronounced deceased at the location. Rojas faces charges including rape and grand larceny, and is being held without bail. [So far — give a woke judge a chance —Ed]. He entered a not guilty plea and is due to appear in court on May 5.

Prosecutors revealed he had presented "a passport from another country" upon surrendering to the NYPD. The ICE spokesperson noted that Rojas's most recent illegal entry date remains unknown. ICE officials in New York City filed immigration detainers against Jeronimo's release with Manhattan Central Booking on Monday, and with the Department of Corrections at Rikers Island on Wednesday following his remand order, the spokesperson confirmed.

An ICE spokesperson, referring to the accused as Felix Jeronimo-Rojas, confirmed Border Patrol encounters in 1998 (three times) and 1999 (once), with Rojas voluntarily returning to Mexico after each instance.

Sorry, pal, but I already claimed that seat (Updated)

UPDATE: The world’s worst person suddenly finds Catholicism; JD Vance answers.

There are no solutions, only choices. — Thomas Sowell.

press-ganged Operation Quiet Yards “volunteers” tidy up bruce park under the watchful eye of foreman “AL”

And every choice has consequences — good, not so good, and bad. Here in bucolic Greenwich, the “Quiet Yards” group teamed up with the Al Gore crowd and a year ago January persuaded the RTM to ban gasoline-powered leaf blowers. The consequence: millions to be spent by private lawn maintenance companies replacing their current machines(a cost that will be passed on to property owners retaining their services); and at least a half-million dollars required to convert half the town’s arsenal of blowers and double that when the transition is complete, money that will be imposed on all property owners, including those who eschew hired Mexicans, and use goats or small Congolese children to keep their lawns trimmed, or simply choose to grow a lyme tick haven. Naturally, the banning crowd doesn’t want to hear that their solution will require higher taxes, so they have simply denied reality and insist that, like electric cars, leaf blowers can be run at no cost by powering them on, to quote (the other) John Kennedy, “pixie dust and unicorn urine.”

The ban was approved, but not the money, and this is the consequence.

Greenwich has just six electric leaf blowers as summer ban nears: 'Operational inefficiencies'

GREENWICH — Summertime restrictions on the use of gasoline-powered leaf blowers take effect later this month, but a couple of town departments are going to have to be good at sharing to comply.

The town Departments of Public Works and Parks and Recreation had sought a combined total of roughly $476,000 to buy new electric leaf blowers, but the Republicans on the finance board voted to remove that funding from the budget in April. ….

The departments had planned to buy enough electric blowers to replace half their fleets, but town leaders now intend to get by with much less.

Parks and Recreation hoped to buy 21 blowers and DPW wanted 15, as well as various batteries and chargers, according to town documents, which would have converted half the respective fleets from gas to electric.

But instead of heading into summer with more than 30 blowers, the two departments will have six blowers between them.

…. Gasoline-powered leaf blowers cannot be used in residential zoning starting at 6 p.m. the Friday before Memorial Day through September 30, except for properties of two or more acres, where the prohibition ends the day after Labor Day. This year, the blower rules take effect on May 23 at 6 p.m.

The blower rules apply to residents, businesses and town workers operating in residential zones.

The town departments first sought blower replacement funds — $265,000 for Parks and Recreation and $211,000 for the DPW — in December. The request was denied at the time and departments were told to include the money in the regular budget process, which happens early each year.

During budgeting, Harry Fisher, chair of the Board of Estimate and Taxation, said the town government should not comply with the blower rules, so he and his Republican colleagues voted to cut the money from the town's spending plan.

"We're not accepting the mandate from the RTM, which we think is an undue burden on the town," he said on April 3.

Siciliano, in past remarks, has said his department is tasked with maintaining more than 2,000 acres of land throughout the town.

"The limited number of electric blowers will cause operational inefficiencies," the joint statement said, while acknowledging that buying a few electric blowers is better than nothing. "Staff will work collaboratively to prioritize usage across town properties and operations to ensure the most effective deployment of equipment."

In the statement, Siciliano and Michel said they considered three options for how to deal with the lack of funds and decided it was best to just buy what they can and share as needed.

The town was warned of what was coming back in December, but chose to push on ahead with the ban:

Cost to convert entire Greenwich fleet to electric leaf blowers 'shellshocking,' officials say

By Andy Blye, Staff Writer Dec 14, 2024

GREENWICH — Town officials voted to enact a summertime ban on gas-powered leaf blowers earlier this year and now the bill is coming due.

The Departments of Public Works and Parks and Recreation have asked finance officials for $476,000 to buy new electric leaf blowers and upgrade facilities to store the new gear.

…. DPW and Parks and Recreation leaders told the Board of Estimate and Taxation on Dec. 10 that the $476,000 is basically the bare minimum they need to go electric and comply with the legislation.

“We're not over-asking,” Parks and Recreation director Joe Siciliano said. “We're just asking for what we think we need based on our work capacity and also the amount of acreage, which in Parks — it's over 2,000 acres.”

The $476,000 request includes $265,000 for Parks and Recreation and $211,000 for the DPW, according to documents submitted to the BET.

The total would allow the two departments to convert half of their respective blower fleets to electric, Deputy Commissioner of Public Works Jim Michel said.

"If we were to truly do this for the whole fleet, full power and so forth, we'd probably be looking at all new (electric) services, basically from the (utility) poles out on the street," he said. “Which would have been a significantly higher number than you even have in front of you today, which we knew was going to shellshock (the BET) because it was shellshocking us.” 

Parks and Recreation wants to buy 21 Stihl backpack leaf blowers, dozens of accompanying batteries, handheld leaf blowers and 21 portable power stations to charge up in the field. DPW is requesting the same equipment in smaller quantities.

The bulk of the cost, Siciliano said, comes from the batteries. The Parks Department asked for 21 primary backpack batteries which cost $1,529 each, according to BET documents, and each of the 42 backup batteries cost $1,299.

The departments have also asked for money to upgrade electrical panels in storage sheds so they can handle the excess power demands as well as money to buy specialized cabinets to hold the batteries. The cabinets are designed to stop the spread of fire if a battery fails and combusts. [Oops! That’ll have to wait for another year, or decade, or until one of the maintenance sheds blows up.]

Each battery lasts about two hours, officials said, but that can vary depending on how vigorously the batteries are being used. A light job may extend battery life past two hours, but intense blowing will drain the charge quicker.

Given that capacity, officials are working off the assumption that a blower will start a work day with two full batteries and one filling up on a mobile charger. As batteries are drained, they will go on the charger — and even then crews may run out of juice.

“I do think that the three (batteries) are gonna get us through the day, just barely, in most of our jobs,” Daniel Carlsen, assistant director of parks and recreation, said.

The leaf blower debate started in 2022, when Quiet Yards Greenwich, a community group dedicated to limiting use of gas blowers, outlined their request for officials to limit the use of gas blowers in town.

Advocates …. took their plan to the Representative Town Meeting in hopes of modifying the town’s noise ordinance. [The RTM approved the leaf blower rules in January 2024 and they took effect for the first time last year.]

…. Parks and Recreation and DPW leaders came forward with their request to buy new equipment now, they said, outside of the regular budget cycle, so the gear gets ordered and arrived before the variance expires.

Some members of the BET did not find the timing argument convincing.

“This should be in the budget cycle,” BET chair Harry Fisher said. “They should go back to the authorities and request another (noise) extension.”

… The BET budget committee voted 2-2 along party lines on Dec. 10 to reject the requests worth $476,000, with Republicans opposed and Democrats in favor. Without a majority, the item failed.

Gentlemen, start your goats.

A Saturday morning (mourning?) treat, and Not the Bee's got it!

A trio of best of clips showing that intellectual giant from Georgia’s 4th congressional district Hank Johnson in action, including his latest adventure into The Land of the Brain Dead. Mr. Johnson has been elected and reelected by his constituents 9X, just in case you’re wondering. Like knows like.

Verified genius Rep. Hank Johnson has thoughts about Latinos at Home Depot. Please enjoy.

Peter Heck:

He's a legend.

There's no two ways about the fact that whenever he leaves office, Representative Hank Johnson will leave behind a legacy of one of America's greatest legislators. Representing Georgia's 4th congressional district, he may be unassuming at first, but behind the façade of just another unassuming man in a suit, walking the streets of D.C., lies a dizzying intellect, and one of the most articulate minds ever to appear under the Capitol Dome.

Before you accuse me of drenching my words in sarcasm, let me remind you that had it not been for Johnson's foresight, the tiny island of Guam might not even exist today. More on that in a minute. But first, here is the charismatic visioner himself, back in action this week, addressing the immigration issue with a biting precision and a cultural sensitivity that only he can deliver:

Yes, that's Johnson's riff on the famous Martin Niemöller poem, confessing his sins in not speaking up for the targets of Naziism in his native Germany. I never considered that anyone's version could match up with the power of the original, but the "Latinos at Home Depot?" Pure gold.

But wait, there’s more!


You can damn well bet they won't let their gardeners and nannies unionize

The lady communists of Greenwich Invisible celebrated May Day by assembling at the Havemeyer Building and screeching “Power to the People, Right On!” They then retired to the Field Club for tea and martinis, and a grand time was had by all. The girls had saved the nation once again.

Greenwich Indivisible said they gathered on May 1st—International Workers’ Day—not just to remember the past (“And who could ever forget that wonderful day we occupied the cafeteria at Vassar for an entire morning?” gushed Greenwich Invisible president Valarie Smith-Hopkins), but to stand firmly in the present and fight for a better future.

The Greenwich event was organized by Indivisible Greenwich and was one of over 1000 “May Day Strong” events held nationwide, organized and promoted by organizations, including Indivisible.org, MoveOn, National Education Association, Public Citizen and labor unions.

“The vigil was a mass display (estimated at 25-30, including reporters) of unity calling attention to the fact that Trump and congressional Republicans are doubling down on their agenda to gut essential services and programs and take other steps that are enabling authoritarianism,” Indivisible Greenwich said in a press release printed on deckled stationery that, judging from its letterhead, had been lifted from the Indian Harbor’s receptionist’s desk.

According to the release, the gathering also “aimed to call attention to the power grab by the Republican-controlled Greenwich town’s finance board (the Board of Estimate and Taxation). A few weeks ago, our town budget was passed with devastating cuts and without a single Democratic vote. These cuts targeted everyone, from heartlessly evicting seniors in the Nathaniel Witherell nursing home, to locking children in dark closets and poking them with sharp sticks, to converting the Hamill Skating Rink into a pickleball court (“well, that might be acceptable”, conceded Miss Smith-Hopkins), to tearing out the sidewalks at our elementary schools and reducing teachers’ pay to twelve dollars a year, closing Greenwich Point, and cancelling (public) school vacations.”

“Today, we honor the power of collective action and the strength of everyday people who rise up
for justice, dignity, and fair treatment. We stand in solidarity with all who labor — not our domestics, naturally — but especially our teachers and their incredible union and other unions nationwide,

“Today, we don’t just reflect. We rise. We rise in the spirit of those who came before us—and in the name of those still fighting now. We are women — well, except for a couple of freaks here with stubble on their chins and bulges in their crotches who claim they are — hear us roar!”

Unfortunately, there are some things Trump can't do, even if he says he can

Start with unrealistic promises that have proved impossible:

Then there’s the legally impossible, at least in the opinion of two conservative, pro-Trump commentators I’ve always found to be sound.

Legal Insurrection: Trump Wants to Revoke Harvard’s Tax Exempt Status

The IRS can revoke Harvard’s status, not the president. Even then it has specific criteria to revoke tax-exempt status.

“The IRS has strict criteria to follow to revoke tax-exempt status. Despite Harvard becoming an antisemitic cesspool…it’s not on the list:

  • Private Benefit/Inurement: Activities cannot serve private interests or certain individuals. It has to serve the public. Income and assets cannot benefit insiders.

  • Lobbying: These “activities cannot be more than an insubstantial part of its overall activities.”

  • Political Activity: No electioneering. None.

  • Unrelated Business Income: Earning too much income from unrelated activities that aren’t related to the organization’s exempt purpose. The IRS said, though, “there are some modifications, exclusions, and exceptions.”

  • Annual Reporting Obligation: Must fill out one of the Form 990 series every year.

  • Operation in accord with stated exempt purposes: Don’t deviate from the purpose given on IRS form for exemption.

“I’ve seen people point to H.R.2676, the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, but after reading it, I found that it specifically states that no federal official can tell the IRS to investigate a taxpayer to increase trust in tax enforcement.”

The next one is equally disappointing, even if the effect would be pretty much insignificant except as a message:

John Hinderaker, powerLine:

Goodbye to NPR and PBS?

Yesterday, President Trump issued an executive order to the Board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, directing the Board not to fund National Public Radio (NPR) or the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). The order makes the policy case for defunding these organizations, with which I agree. One should note, however, that NPR and PBS, as well as their local affiliates, receive only a small percentage of their revenue from the federal government, so they will continue to operate regardless of Trump’s order.

This order, like several others Trump has issued, raises the issue of how control over spending is divided between Congress and the President under Articles I and II of the Constitution.

Trump’s argument would be that he runs (under Article II, he is) the Executive Branch, and therefore he can direct the Board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting as to how to spend its money. In this instance, his order functions much like a line-item veto–a power which, I believe, most governors enjoy, but which the President has not traditionally been viewed as possessing.

One obvious question is, has Congress specifically authorized money to go to NPR or PBS? I searched the 2025 federal budget for references to the Corporation, and found this:


While I am no expert on the federal budget, it appears that Congress has simply allocated money to CPB and left the distribution of that revenue to CPB’s discretion. That supports the idea that the President, as head of the Executive Branch, can direct the CPB’s Board not to fund NPR and PBS. On the other hand, the vast majority of CPB’s spending goes to NPR and PBS, and Congress obviously intended that it do so when it appropriated around a half-billion dollars to CPB for the current fiscal year.

It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will ultimately sort out the constitutional issues relating to spending. Remarkably, in our more than 200-year history the Court seems not to have resolved the questions surrounding this important subject. (Contrary to what is sometimes alleged, in the Train case the parties apparently never made any constitutional claims, and the Court did not address any constitutional issue.) Intuitively, I think the President’s position will be strongest when he withholds or redirects spending because fraud or waste have been uncovered in a federal program, and weakest when he simply disagrees with a policy that Congress has adopted–here, funding public radio and television.

Shocker of the day — well, the afternoon, at least

Shot: 

California’s high-speed rail leaders sound alarm over project’s financial future.

As California’s High-Speed Rail Authority awaits word from the Trump administration over its future support for the train, leaders who oversee the project sounded the alarm about its financial viability.

The authority’s board of directors voted Thursday to approve contracts for the development of Central Valley station designs and to solicit and approve construction bids for the Fresno station. Ahead of the votes, board member James Ghielmetti raised concerns over the potential loss of funds from the Department of Transportation and the risk of moving forward on payment commitments when federal funding is in jeopardy.

“I’m very nervous about receiving the federal funding,” Ghielmetti said. “I want to make sure my fellow board members are aware that if the federal money does not come through, somebody’s got to backstop these contracts.”

—The L.A. Times, yesterday.

Chaser:

They’re right to be worried panicked this time:

U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy Announces Review of California High-Speed Rail Project

Thursday, February 20, 2025

WASHINGTON – Today, at the direction of Secretary of Transportation Sean P. Duffy, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) initiated a review of the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA). This review will help determine whether roughly $4 billion in taxpayer money should remain committed to the proposed project to build high-speed rail in the California Central Valley between Merced and Bakersfield.

The entire San Francisco to Los Angeles project was initially supposed to be completed by 2020 and cost $33 billion. Today, the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment alone would cost more than the original total. The latest estimate for San Francisco to Los Angeles is $106 billion — more than three times the original cost estimate.

….

As recently noted by the California High-Speed Rail Office of the Inspector General, just the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment has a funding gap of at least $6.5 billion. That gap remains despite California being due to receive over $4 billion from the Biden Administration. The CHSRA Inspector General also found that even this limited project, with barely 2 million in annual projected ridership because it fails to connect California’s larger cities, is unlikely to be completed by 2033.

In March of 2023, the CHSRA Peer Review Group, charged with evaluating CHSRA’s funding plans, reported an “unfunded gap of $92.6 billion to $103.1 billion between estimated costs and known State and Federal funding” for the San Francisco-to-Las Angeles connection. Given the red flags raised about this project, FRA will investigate the delays and cost overruns through a compliance and performance review.

Oh, dear; so sad

“Time’s up!”

PROMISE?! The Economist Says the UN Could Run Out of Money IN MERE MONTHS

“Last year the UN had a $200m cash shortfall, despite spending only 90% of its planned budget. This year will be much worse. Internal modelling suggests that the year-end cash deficit will, without cuts, probably blow out to $1.1bn, leaving the UN without money to pay salaries and suppliers by September.”

Bonus Material: Painted in the (60s?), seen and snapshot taken in a Catholic meeting hall in the 90s

So you're on your third wife, and reasonably happy, but what do you do with wives one and two? Where do you put them? The answer is coming.

Just about to hit the market, 29 Taconic Road will offer three houses on 5.4 un-subdivisible acres, all for $5.395 million. (Part of ) the main house was built in 1751 and, although the interior pictures aren’t up yet, it looks fabulous. And it’s a much quicker trip to town now than it was back then.