You can't say they didn't warn us

Don’t underestimate what Democrats can accomplish with a unified delegation at the state capitol.”

  Across the U.S., Democrats are waging war to crush a lifestyle they abhor. Call it small-town America: single-family neighborhoods, quiet streets, town centers stamped with their own historic character, and almost no signs of the vagrancy and homeless encampments that plague cities.

        Democrats want you to have none of this. If you've worked for years to save up for a home in one of these havens, forget about it.

        The Democratic Party is using brute legal force to remake towns using a cookie-cutter formula that forces each to have the same proportion of houses and apartments, the same mix of low-, middle- and upper-income residents, and the same reliance on public transit, all controlled by state politicians.

        Any town that resists gets shamed as "segregated" -- though this isn't about race -- and "snobby."

        On Saturday, the Connecticut legislature passed a bill, H.B. 5002, which should be called the Destroy Connecticut Towns Act. It's headed to Gov. Ned Lamont's desk for signature. The new law dictates how many low-income and moderate-income apartments each Connecticut town must provide, and mandates that towns also foot the bill for the schools, parks, public transportation and other services low-income residents will need. Local taxes will soar.

        The bill explicitly says its purpose is to ensure "economic diversity" in each town. This is about social engineering, not remedying housing shortages.

        Democrat Bob Duff, the state senate majority leader, says "it's extremely important ... that we don't segregate people based on a ZIP code." Everyone, regardless of income, should have the opportunity to choose to live in any town.

        The bill mandates that the wealthiest towns, mostly in lower Fairfield County, provide most of the new housing, even though that raises the cost. Land costs less in other towns, and lower-income people this bill is supposed to serve are more likely to find bus transportation and affordable stores in these other towns as well.

        Connecticut lawmakers are nixing local rule. Ordinances that protect the appearance of a town have to be overruled. The bill states that multifamily buildings of up to 24 units will no longer have to provide off-street parking. Envision cars lining every residential street.

        Towns also will be forced to welcome vagrants who want to sleep in parks and public lots. The bill outlaws "hostile architecture," meaning park benches with armrests and divided seating, or stone walls with spikes on top that deter sleeping in the rough.

        Instead, the bill launches a program of mobile showers and mobile laundry services on trucks to serve the homeless wherever they choose. Picture the mobile showers pulling up to Greenwich Common Park on the town's main street, or Waveny Park in New Canaan.

        How can kids walk around town with their pals if there are homeless encampments? Judge Glock, director of research at the Manhattan Institute think tank, points out that the homeless amount to 1% of the population in Los Angeles but commit 25% of the homicides. Inviting the homeless means inviting crime and drugs.

        Californicating the small towns of Connecticut by encouraging public camping and vagrancy "is frightening," says Glock.

      ….

        Similarly, in New Jersey, Democratic Gov. Tim Murphy is pushing lawmakers to override local ordinances and impose the same kinds "reforms" as those in the Connecticut bill.

        In all these states and across the country, small-town Americans need to fight back. There is no constitutional right to live in a wealthy town with single-family homes and leafy, quiet streets.

        It's something you earn.  Once you've purchased a home, you have a right to protect its value.

There's a reason why hard drinkers and reporters — but I repeat myself — shouldn’t post on social media or send emails after, say, 8:30 PM

ABC's Terry Moran suspended after journalist slams Trump, top advisor in since-deleted post

Moran said Trump and Stephen Miller were each a 'world-class hater'

Trump had this hack’s number back in April:

Moran interviewed the president after his 100th day in office, during which Trump called out the ABC correspondent for his questioning. 

Trump accused Moran of "not being very nice" during an exchange about the deportation of illegal immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

"They’re giving you the big break of a lifetime," Trump told Moran. "You’re doing the interview, I picked you because, frankly, I never heard of you, but that’s okay. I picked you, Terry, but you’re not being very nice."

Moran also pressed Trump on his relationship with Russia's Vladimir Putin. 

"I don’t trust you. I don’t trust a lot of people," Trump responded. "I don’t trust you. Look at you. You’re so happy to do the interview, and then you start hitting me with these fake questions."

And:

"We had a president that was grossly incompetent," Trump said. "You knew it. I knew it. Everybody knew it. You guys didn’t want to write about it because you’re fake news." 

"By the way, ABC is one of the worst, I have to be honest with you," he added. 

Here's who Democrats and commies are demanding be released to prey on their communities (Updated)

"This morning, we received reports of federal immigration enforcement actions in multiple locations in Los Angeles," Bass said in a statement on Friday. "

As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place. These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My Office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this."

Immigration authorities highlight criminal history of multiple migrants arrested in Los Angeles

  • Rolando Veneracion-Enriquez, 55, of the Philippines, has a criminal history that includes a burglary in Ontario, California, for which he was sentenced to four years in prison, and sexual penetration with a foreign object with force and assault with intent to commit rape in the city of Pomona, for which he was sentenced to 37 years in prison. He was arrested on Saturday and served a notice to appear.

  • Jose Gregorio Medranda Ortiz, 42, of Ecuador, was arrested Friday and served administrative deportation. His criminal history includes being sentenced to more than 11 years in prison for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine while on board a vessel in Tampa, Florida.

  • Armando Ordaz, 44, of Mexico, was arrested on Friday. He is an alleged active gang member of Bratz 13 who has a criminal history that includes sexual battery in Los Angeles, landing him a sentence of 135 days in jail and five years probation. He was also sentenced to 90 days in jail and three years probation for receiving known or stolen property in Norwalk and sentenced to 365 days in jail and four years probation for petty theft in Los Angeles.

  • Victor Mendoza-Aguilar, 32, of Mexico, was arrested on Friday and has a criminal history in Pasadena that includes being sentenced to 112 days in jail for possessing unlawful paraphernalia, being sentenced to 16 months in jail for possessing controlled substances, being sentenced to four years behind bars for assault with a deadly weapon and being sentenced to 364 days in jail for obstructing a public officer. He is an alleged active member of the Villa Boys gang and was previously removed from the U.S. in 2017.

  • Delfino Aguilar-Martinez, 51, of Mexico, was arrested on Friday and served a notice to appear. His criminal history includes assault with a deadly weapon with great bodily injury in Los Angeles, and he was sentenced to a year in jail.

  • Jesus Alan Hernandez-Morales, 26, of Mexico, was removed from the U.S. on Saturday. His criminal history includes being sentenced in Las Cruces, New Mexico, to 239 days in jail for conspiracy to transport an illegal migrant.

  • Lionel Sanchez-Laguna, 55, of Mexico, was arrested on Tuesday. He has a criminal history in the city of Orange that includes being sentenced to 365 days in jail for discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling and vehicle, being sentenced to four years probation for battery on a spouse or cohabitant, being sentenced to four years probation for willful cruelty to a child, being sentenced to 10 days in jail for driving under the influence, being sentenced to three years behind bars for assault with a semi-automatic firearm and being sentenced to three years behind bars for personal use of a firearm.

Bonus Material: CNN reprises its Fiery but Peaceful debacle from the George Floyd Summer of Love

that was then

THIS IS NOW

UPDATE: A friend of InstaPundit’s Glenn Reynolds wrote to him, pointing out that “there’s a difference between wanting to be in America and wanting to be an American” — how true that is, and the difference is illustrated every day.

Captain Renault goes to Washington

consolation for your children when they reach 65

Peruvian-American congressman Robert Garcia claims shock at discovering describes Social Security as a Ponzi scheme.

During a House oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, Garcia grilled Power the Future CEO Dan Turner while holding up a posterboard of a past tweet calling Social Security a "government-sponsored Ponzi scheme."

"Madoff went to jail for it. Congress runs on it," the post said. "I should be able to keep 100% of my money and not watch government waste it with a paltry percentage return."

Garcia then suggested that post was evidence that Turner lacks the credibility to be testifying about the billions of federal tax dollars directed to left-wing NGOs. 

"A Ponzi scheme and so I think it's interesting, of course, as one of our Republican witnesses is calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme, and that's the person that we should be taking advice from here today," Garcia said. 

You’ll have noticed that no Democrat has ever denied the waste and fraud occurring in social programs and exposed by the DOGE (and by decades of reformers before Musk and his team) and rather than defend the undefendable , they drag out the same old tropeL “think of the children!” Garcia followed his party’s game plan: he doesn’t address the fact that Social Security is going bust, and that cutting fraudsters and dead people from the rolls will strengthen, not weaken the program; he turns to hysteria and tears to argue against any attempt to rein in spending. When you can’t argue the facts, argue the emotions. The old advice to lawyers still holds: “If the law’s on your side, argue the law; if the facts are on your side, argue the facts; if neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table.” The Democrats are table-pounders.

"Without Social Security, 22 million people would be pushed into poverty. That includes over 16 million seniors and nearly 1 million children. And in fact, Elon Musk has also said and agreed with you, sir, that this is a Ponzi scheme. I think it's ironic that you are one of our witnesses talking about efficiency when you want to attack the single best program that we have to support people not just out of poverty, but across this country to uplift them, to ensure they can afford a decent life."

Fox News Digital spoke to Turner, who stood by his post and outlined his belief, echoed by many, that Social Security is structured like a Ponzi scheme by definition. 

"Rep Garcia does not know the definition of Ponzi scheme," Turner said. "Social Security is the ultimate Ponzi, demanding more and more people at the bottom pay in to fund the people at the top, expect our demographics have this now reversed. The system will default. Mr. Garcia nor I will likely never see a dime. That should worry him more than my social media feed."

A foreign Army, yes, but one joined by America’s native-born enemies*

*According to the latest woke guidelines, a hyphen is no longer approved for describing someone’s heritage; which is why I made sure to use on, of course.

National Origin | The Chicago School Community

Do not hyphenate national origins even if they are used as adjectives. The use of the hyphen is rooted in the history of the “hyphenated American’—an epithet used during the late 19th century to the early 20th century to ridicule Americans of foreign birth or origin.

Hyphenated American - Wikipedia

I missed this letter to the editor from Margarita Alban, published earlier this week

proposed (later withdrawn) apartment building at 143 Sound Beach Avenue, old greenwich,that would have included both moderate and Market-rate units. Ct’s new housing mandate will likely bring something similar back, soon

I’m including only those excerpts that address the hurdles facing towns by land and building costs, but read the entire letter. I’m also posting a portion of an article on Maine’s encountering the same problem in its own goal of increasing the supply of "affordable” housing: land and building costs mke such housing nearly impossible to build.

Whatever Maine’s problem with the cost of land, you can multiply that number by at least !0X in the affluent towns CT’s Democrats have targeted; If a multi-unit project in Greenwich or Westport or New Canaan must include a substantial percentage of low and moderate priced units, the price of the others must be substantially hiked to cover the sky-high price of land here. The result will be more housing for the very rich and the very poor and none for the middle class. Greenwich is already becoming a town comprised solely of just two classes and the new requirements will only accelerate that transformation. Of course, that’s the Democrats’ goal for all of America, but we maight s well try to delay and maybe even thwart that effort.

HB 5002 Fails US ALL

June 3, 2025

Submitted by Margarita Alban [Chair of the Greenwich Planning & Zoning Commission, but writing as a rivate citizen]

  • The housing bill just passed by the CT General Assembly, HB 5002, is a combination of 22 different bills proposed during the 2025 legislative session. The bill moved so quickly that Planning & Zoning is still unpacking its language and potential impact. My personal view is the bill does not tackle the single greatest obstacle to the creation of affordable and diverse housing in our State.

  • HB 5002 fails because it doesn’t address funding or economics. The bill presses municipalities to increase housing density. In the face of that, it’s worth knowing Greenwich Planning & Zoning has recently approved over 1,000 new housing units. Yet, many of those housing units aren’t being built.

  • Why aren’t we seeing that housing construction? Builders tell us they are struggling with increases in materials costs, interest rate hikes and tariff uncertainty. Other towns are hearing the same from their developers. That’s why approved housing projects aren’t moving ahead, not only here but throughout the State.  Shifting economics.

….

  • Under the bill, Towns will be assigned new affordable housing targets based on a formula which relies on the value of the town’s real estate.  The price of real estate is a very poor proxy for the size and location of populations needing reasonably priced housing.

  • From a planning perspective, I’m deeply troubled the bill is not rooted in a study of where our State truly needs more housing and at what income levels the housing gap is greatest.  For example, I’ve seen no report of how far workers are commuting to reach their employment.  Nor do we know how many people are at greatest need because they are unable to find housing.  As a result, the bill fails workers with long commutes as well as our most vulnerable populations.

  • By focusing on zoning and superficial measures, HB 5002 fails to address the real issues and, thus, fails us all. ….

And:

The hole in Maine’s strategy to build more housing

Sam Hight only had to pay the town of Madison $1 for a prime parcel of land.

That allowed Hight and his partners to build an 18-unit affordable housing complex that opened last year. But it would not have happened without a state subsidy, even though the developers had essentially the lowest-cost construction plan for a project of this size.

“I’ve been trying to figure out a way to provide market rate housing using conventional financing, but with multi-unit buildings and interest rates and the cost of construction materials, it really didn’t pan out at all,” said Hight, who runs his family’s car dealerships in Skowhegan.

Hight’s experience is shared by others working on market-rate housing in low-income parts of Maine. It also shows a hole in the state’s strategy. Lofty housing goals rely on rural communities dramatically upping production. But developers cannot keep units affordable without subsidies [from Maine taxpayers, most of whom aren’t eligible for such housing — FWIW ED], meaning very little affordable housing will come naturally.

The Madison project cost $5 million, with $3 million in the form of a 45-year loan from a rural housing program run by MaineHousing. While the real cost was around $280,000 per unit, the subsidy dropped that to just over $110,000, enough to meet a requirement of keeping the apartments affordable to those making no more than 80 percent of the area median income.

Hight and his partners used modular homes from KBS Inc. of South Paris. They did not have to build roads or pay to hook up to utilities. The developers are set to begin construction on a similar 18-unit modular housing project in the western Maine town of Rumford this spring. The median household income there is nearly $40,000, according to Census data.

“We’re doing the cheapest kind of construction we can do,” Kara Wilbur, a developer with modular builder Dooryard who is partnering with Hight, said.

In Rumford, they bought the land for $12,000. That discount from its $46,000 valuation is one of a series of changes that the western Maine mill town Rumford has made recently to woo affordable housing developers.

Low-to-no-cost land is often a necessity to pencil out projects, said developer Kevin Bunker, principal at Portland-based Developers Collaborative, whose company has taken advantage of these sorts of deals in communities including Bangor, Portland and Augusta. It often helps projects score higher in MaineHousing applications for subsidies.

But it is no panacea. For one, George O’Keefe, Rumford’s town manager, said he is wary of giving land away because he wants to preserve property values. Construction costs and interest rates are also so high that it does not generally make much of a dent in price, Bunker said.

“If you think of land as maybe 10 percent of a total project and construction as maybe 80 percent, you can imagine even as land approaches $0 per unit, it doesn’t go as far as, say, a 20 percent reduction in construction,” Bunker said. ….

Unplugged

Only 16% of U.S. adults report being “very likely” or “likely” to purchase a fully electric vehicle (EV) as their next car

The lowest percentage recorded of EV interest since 2019. The percentage of consumers indicating they would be “unlikely” or “very unlikely” to purchase an EV rose from 51% to 63%, the highest since 2022

And had the pollsters asked how many intended to rely on EVs as their household’s exclusive form of automobile transportation, the number would probably have dropped to less than 1%.

Here’s a (2023) look at the EV picture in California from the non-partisan publication CalMatters’ 15-part series, Race to Zero: California's bumpy road to electrify cars and trucks:

Who buys electric cars in California — and who doesn’t?

by Nadia Lopez and Erica Yee March 22, 2023

In summary

Communities with high concentrations of electric cars are affluent, college-educated and at least 75% white and Asian. In contrast, electric cars are almost nonexistent in Black, Latino, low-income and rural communities — revealing the enormous task that California faces electrifying the entire fleet.

In Atherton, one of the nation’s richest towns, giant oaks and well-manicured hedges surround gated mansions owned by some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent billionaires, basketball stars, tech executives and venture capitalists. 

Each set on an acre of land, six-bedroom estates with brick-paved pathways, neoclassical statues and cascading fountains are on full display. But increasingly, another status symbol has been parked in these driveways: a shiny electric car — sometimes two.

This tiny San Mateo County community — with an average home value of almost $7.5 million and average household income exceeding half a million dollars — has California’s highest percentage of electric cars, according to a CalMatters analysis of data from the Energy Commission. About one out of every seven, or 14%, of Atherton’s 6,261 cars are electric. 

CalMatters’ statewide analysis of ZIP codes reveals a strikingly homogenous portrait of who owns electric vehicles in California: Communities with mostly white and Asian, college-educated and high-income residents have the state’s highest concentrations of zero-emission cars. And most are concentrated in Silicon Valley cities and affluent coastal areas of Los Angeles and Orange counties.

This racial and economic divide may be unsurprising — but it illustrates the mammoth task that California faces as it tries to electrify its 25 million cars to battle climate change, clean up its severe air pollution and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Under a state mandate enacted last year, 35% of cars sold in California, beginning with 2026 models, must be zero-emissions, ramping up to 68% in 2030 and 100% in 2035.

If people who buy electric cars are largely white or Asian, highly educated, wealthy, coastal suburbanites, will the state’s transformation succeed? Will new electric cars be attainable for all Californians — no matter their race, income and location — in the coming decade? 

High upfront vehicle costs, lack of chargers for renters and inadequate access to public charging stations in low-income and rural communities hamper California’s ability to expand EV ownership beyond affluent parts of the Bay Area and Los Angeles area. 

The cost of new electric cars is the most obvious factor driving the racial and income disparities in who buys them: The average as of February was $58,385 — about $9,600 more than the average car — although it dropped from about $65,000 last year. Lower-end fully electric cars start around $27,500

Kevin Fingerman, an associate professor of energy and climate at California State Polytechnic University Humboldt, said the primary reason why more people in white, affluent, college-educated communities own electric cars is that they tend to be early adopters of new technology, with easier access.

“California is prioritizing the rapid electrification of the light-duty vehicle sector and it’s right in doing so. But it’s going to be important in the process to make sure that there is equitable access,” said Fingerman, who co-authored a study on racial and income disparities to electric vehicle charging. 

A portrait of electric car hotspots

About 838,000 electric cars were on California’s roads in 2021, and under the state mandate, it’s expected [uh huh — “expected” to be followed by “unexpected failure”- ED] to surge to 12.5 million by 2035.

…. California’s highest concentrations of electric cars — between 10.9% and 14.2% of all vehicles — are in ZIP codes where residents are at least 75% white and Asian. In addition to Atherton, that includes neighborhoods in Los Altos, Palo Alto, Berkeley, Santa Monica and Newport Coast, among others.

In stark contrast, California ZIP codes with the largest percentages of Latino and Black residents have extremely low proportions of electric cars.

In the 20 California ZIP codes where Latinos make up more than 95% of the population — including parts of Kings, Tulare, Fresno, Riverside and Imperial counties — between zero and 1% of cars are electric.

Income seems to be a main driver of the disparities, according to CalMatters’ analysis. Most of the median household incomes in the top 10 exceed $200,000, much higher than the statewide $84,097. Typical home values in those communities exceed $3 million, according to Zillow estimates.

In contrast, electric cars are nearly non-existent in California’s lowest income communities: only 1.4% of cars in Stockton’s 95202, where the median household income is $16,976, and 0.5% in Fresno’s 93701, where the median is $25,905. Most are plug-in hybrids, which are less expensive.

Rural and remote parts of the state — even the entire Central Valley — also are left out of the top ZIP codes with electric cars. With limited charging access, rural residents who drive long distances fear they’ll get stranded if their car runs out of juice.

Black and Latino residents — who make up almost half of California’s population — are less than half as likely as whites to have access to a public charger, according to the study Fingerman co-authored. Disparities in access are also higher in areas with more multi-unit housing, the study showed. 

‘We need better options for renters’

Charging remains one of the biggest concerns for people who own or are interested in buying an electric vehicle. California has about 80,000 public chargers, with another estimated 17,000 on the way. But the state will need 1.2 million for the 7.5 million electric vehicles expected on the roads by 2030. [See part 12 of this series, California needs a million EV charging stations — but that’s ‘unlikely’ and ‘unrealistic’]

Many people residing in apartments or condominiums are reliant on public charging stations because they don’t have chargers in their buildings’ parking garages. A standard level 2 charger costs between $500 and $700, plus installing an electricity meter costs $2,000 to $8,000 or more, according to Pacific Gas & Electric

…. It’s a widespread problem that state leaders have been trying to address. By January 2025, a new law passed last year will require the state to adopt regulations requiring businesses to install charging stations in existing commercial buildings. Another 2022 law will require new and existing buildings, including hotels, motels and multi-family dwellings, to install charging stations. 

The rural dilemma: ‘They don’t want to get stuck’ 

…. None of the top ZIP codes with high concentrations of electric vehicles are in the middle of the state — including the vast Central Valley — or in eastern counties. Instead, they are congregated along the coasts in populous parts of the Bay Area and Los Angeles, according to CalMatters’ analysis.

The unpredictability of charging stations in Sierra Nevada towns has been deeply frustrating, {EV owner Kay Ogden, 62, “ an avid environmentalist and executive director of the Eastern Sierra Land Trust, ] said. 

“I go to charge at a certain place and three out of five are broken, or they’ve been vandalized and maybe there’s snow or trash piled up by one and you can’t get to it,” Ogden said. “The companies need to be held accountable for having chargers that are listed on apps that don’t work.”

More than half of 3,500 drivers in a nationwide survey, conducted by the consumer advocacy group Plug In America, reported encountering problems with broken public chargers. Another survey by the air board found barriers to charging and broken chargers.

…. “If there’s a pretty robust charging system in rural areas, there’s going to be more people interested in buying EVs,” Burris said. “I don’t think we’re going to hit our goals as a state unless rural areas are included a bit more than they have been in recent years.”

All of these hurdles, and more, are supposed to be eliminated by 2030 and 2035 — right in time for California’s residents to take the bullet train from LA to San Francisco. You betcha.

What would we do without corporations with a social conscience?

I saw this tag on a shirt I’d purchased at Walmart’s the other day (yes, I buy my ascots there too), and at first I was delighted to see that I’d helped support “Better Cotton’s mission” — whatever that mission is, I’m sure it’s a noble one, and I simply glowed with pleasure, knowing that I’d helped save the whales, or ended global warming or protected poor Pakistani cotton pickers from harmful pesticides, or … whatever.

But then I read the cautionary disclaimer at the bottom of the tag, and I’m not certain I’m as proud of myself as I was. I may have to sail to Gaza with Greta to break the Israeli’s food blockade before I can regain that sense of noble accomplishment.

Translation: “we have no idea what’s in here, but we (say) we have good intentions, and that ought to satisfy all but the most rabid of you nuts.”

Well, this isn't good

They did bring him home — to el salvador

There’s gold in them diapers: Kilmar Garcia clutches just one of his trafficked cargo

Victor Davis Hanson: Biden's Border Nihilism Will Live Long After He Is Gone

  • Somewhere between 10-12 million foreign nationals are believed to have entered the U.S. illegally under his watch, to add to the existing 12-20 million illegal aliens.

    Almost all were unaudited.

  • At a time when citizens were expelled from the military for not submitting to the experimental mRNA COVID inoculations, millions of foreign nationals, with the Biden administration's encouragement, crossed the southern border, exempt from any vaccination requirement or medical examination.

  • On some days, the Trump administration has managed to deport 800 of Biden's illegal aliens.

    But ten times that many entered illegally each day under Biden.

    Trump's border patrol would have to deport over 8,000 people every day of his four-year tenure just to undo what Biden wrought by his dismantling of federal immigration law.

  • There are nearly 300,000 Chinese nationals in American universities, the vast majority admitted without serious background checks.

    They are welcomed by elite campuses because they pay the full cost and at a premium, with few questions asked about why exactly they came or what they are doing.

    No wonder, then, that in the last decade, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government is reported to have trained and graduated hundreds of Chinese nationals who were either Communist Party members or the children of prominent Chinese communist apparatchiks.

  • Not a day went by during the last two years without Middle Eastern, pro-Hamas visa students on some campus swarming students in libraries, assaulting and bullying Jews, trashing iconic buildings, illegally camping out in student quads, and screaming to bring the intifada home to the U.S.

    Neither the Biden administration nor spineless college presidents took any action, despite such flagrant violations of both the terms and spirit of student visas.

  • Sometimes the baleful Biden immigration inheritance was simply a matter of allowing "tourists" and "visitors" to stay far after their visas had expired -- without consequences.

    So, for example, Egyptian national and terrorist, Mohammed Sabry Soliman, along with his entire family, deliberately overstayed their visas. They were all residing here illegally when Soliman firebombed Jews, crying out "Free Palestine" as he tried to burn them up.

  • Was [this because of] Biden's characteristic incompetence or dementia?

    Or did Biden simply want to alter the demography to find a constituency for his otherwise unpopular agendas?

    Did he wish to grow the welfare state?

    Was Biden hoping to expand the DEI agenda by bringing in the poor and supposedly oppressed as new fodder in the Left's Marxist binary of victimized versus victimizer?

    No one knows why Biden did it, only that he did -- and we will suffer his nihilist legacy for years to come.