Amazing election results: Ned Lamont only won the Democrat primary by 85%

Joe Ganim received 15% of the votes.

After serving seven years in prison for corruption and stealing from his constituents, Ganim was reelected Mayor of Bridgeport by an overwhelming margin, which, given his city's electorate, should have come as no surprise, but couldn't retrieve his law license. But he did have chutzpah to seek his party's nomination for Governor — give him that.

In July 2010, Ganim was released after serving seven years in prison.[34] After his release, Ganim worked as a legal assistant at his family’s law firm in Bridgeport.[35] Ganim and his brother George Ganim Jr. also opened a consulting service, Federal Prison Consultant LLC, which offered other white-collar convicts advice on surviving federal prison terms.[36]

Ganim also sought restoration of his license to practice law. In 2012, a five-member panel of the State of Connecticut Grievance Committee recommended that Ganim’s license be restored.[37] In September 2012, a three-judge panel of Connecticut Superior Court judges rejected the recommendation, writing that: “Allowing an applicant to be readmitted to the practice of law following a conviction on 16 counts of racketeering, conspiracy, extortion, mail fraud, bribery and filing false income tax returns without any apology, expression of remorse, or explanation, and with only a vague acceptance of an unspecified event, simply would set the bar for readmission too low in the state, and we are unwilling to do that.”[38] Ganim appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court in 2014, which unanimously ruled against his effort to have his law license restored.[26][35] In 2017, Ganim applied to the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut for permission to practice in that federal court without being readmitted to the Connecticut bar; these efforts were rebuffed by the court.[39]

With a record of service like that, I'm astonished that only 15% of his fellow Democrats supported his candidacy. Should have been a shoo-in. 

Separated at birth, or just an uncanny resemblance? Just sayin'

Separated at birth, or just an uncanny resemblance? Just sayin'

Well this didn't turn out so well

zaccheus .jpg

167 Zaccheus Mead Lane closed today at $5.835 million. A substantial sum, certainly, but the sellers paid $6.2 for it in 1999, poured a ton of money into it, and have had it on the market since January, 2016, when they launched it on the waters at $10.500. A beautiful home as built in 1904, but not so nice today, and its sale price reflects that.

some things are best left alone

some things are best left alone

Muslim "youths" in Sweden: PM asks "what the "F***s going on?" I could tell him

Muslims burn "over 100 cars" in coordinated attacks, police arrest no one, refuse to label the perpetrators as anything but "youths". 

This has been going on for years, as evidenced by this article dating to 2014, but the Swedish government refuses to admit who is responsible (just as it refuses to adit tat here are n "no-go" zones in its cities. Those with long memories 2017) will remember when Trump was excoriated by our own press when he pointed this out.

 

For once, a bidding war that might have produced a winner

sawmill.jpg

28 Sawmill Lane, originally listed in April at $2.875 million, dropped to $1.975 in June, and found several bidders; just closed at $2.1. I'm usually skeptical of bidding wars — the "winners" almost always turn out to be losers — but in this case, the house is in great shape, with some major renovations/upgrades done during the sellers' ownership, and the price seems right.

But as to my point about bidding wars, these sellers bought the place in 2003. The house was listed at $2.450 million, and after just 7 days they "won" it at $2.650. Given what they sunk into it over the next fifteen years, well ....

NYC moves to stop Uber, Lyft. Very little sympathy here

De Blasio and his City Council freeze permits, regulate taxi competitors. It strikes me that most Uber drivers trend left, so they have this coming. When the story hit the news recently of an Uber driver kicking three (black, if that matters) Trump supporters out of his car, I was going to point out that we're the people defending the right of independent contractors to compete against unions and the governmental authorities that seek to regulate them, but I figured that the deluded fools would soon discover the truth.

Now they have, and they ain't seen nothing yet. 

So screw 'em.

No real estate news, so let's talk politics

There as a large ($8 million) sale on N. Maple yesterday, which I'll post on shortly, but otherwise we're mostly seeing rentals at this end if the summer. But if real estate is dormant, (some) brains aren't, and I highly recommend this essay,  "Purity Spirals into Evil". Excerpts below, but you should really read the entire thing. It offers an expiation of how we've moved from smokestack scrubbers in the 1970s to plastic straw bans in 2018, from #Metoo allegations of rape to  firing professors for a single, harmless joke about lingerie, and more importantly, and to get to the heart of the matter, the complete rejection of Western civilization as a culture based on a cesspool of white, male oppression. 

"If you analyze tyrannical ideologies and the sort of mass mob insanity behind them, you will see a common thread: purity. Nazis obsessed over purity of race. Stalinists obsessed over purity of political beliefs. Jihadists obsess over purity of religious belief. But purity is always there. And purity can twist good into evil, or render a lesser evil into a far greater evil.

What is purity? The dictionary tells us that it is “freedom from adulteration or contamination.” For our purposes, we may use the synonym ‘perfection’ with some utility. The point of purity is to identify impurities and eradicate them. The Nazi will eradicate the racially impure, the Communist will eradicate the impure Capitalists, and so on.

The utility of quests for purity to a tyrant should be obvious. For what is more impure than man? A quest for purity is carte blanche for never ending power over others. Progressivism itself admits this even in the content of its own name. Progress toward what? Purity. Progress toward the perfect society, in which poverty, disease, war, and a thousand other such ills have been eradicated.

Never will you hear the Progressive say “this is good enough, we can stop now.” For them, there is always a new impurity to eradicate. The movement is like the terminator of movie fame:

Kyle Reese: Listen, and understand. That terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

Social Justice is like the terminator in other ways, too. It cloaks itself as one of us. It wears the skin of our institutions in an effort to disguise itself. But always, its mission is to eradicate us. We are the impure. We cannot be permitted to exist.

And when a round of impure are disposed of, new impure are found. Today, it is Rightists. Tomorrow, Centrists. The day after that, Trotskyite Leftists. The terminator never stops. Ever-greater demands of purity are made. Like the Third Reich, the gas chambers never stop. The ash falls from the skies, forever. At least until someone puts a stop to it all at gunpoint.

Purity spirals work so well because fault can always be found with man. Every single human being in the history of our species, save one, has done wrong; has sinned. We all deserve death. That is a fundamental tenet of Christianity. It is also true even if you are the most ardent of atheists. Man is imperfect. And so it will ever be.

Yet, is it the SJW’s responsibility to act as the judge, jury, and executioner? Shall the Nazi do it? Shall the Stalinist? The Jihadist? Not only is there no one among us who could ever make demands of purity upon us, these cretins are the worst of the worst, the most evil among us. And it is they who always lead the charge to purity. The nuts are running the nuthouse.

Rationalizations always exist for why we are bad people. Why we should be punished, why we should give up everything, why we shouldn’t even exist. ALWAYS. Here we are, in America, the most prosperous nation to have ever existed in the history of our species. This is a place where starvation is virtually unknown. Where even the poorest among us possess wonders. And yet our debate constantly shifts toward America as an unjust nation that loves reducing its citizens to poverty, as if we were like Somalia or Haiti. Similar arguments are made for racism, sexism, homophobia, etc…

There are some poor people in America (though they do better here than in most places), thus we are impure. And in the minds of the purity-seekers, this means there is no fundamental difference between us and Haiti. Disagree? You want to push granny off a cliff, you Nazi! Ironic, I think, that the Left names us the Nazis when the modern purity-seekers are almost invariably Leftists.

Purity spirals are how evil manifests itself in its most concentrated human form. It is where humans go collectively insane, where they can rationalize the most hateful and destructive things. When the SJW says that you are a racist for X, he is almost always saying you are impure. They even police their own, thusly. They are always on the lookout for manifestations of impurity even among their own. They are political cannibals, as purists necessarily must be.

[snip]

That’s what our conflict is all about, underneath it all. Purity, and those who use purity as an excuse for tyranny. Far from being the good guys, they are the most evil among us (though we all have at least some evil in us). Far from being those who will usher in an age of peace, love, and tolerance, they are those who will usher in an age of death, war, hatred, and intolerance.

It is always this way with them. When they call you a Nazi, remember that though they have little or no political connection with them, their underlying drive for purity means that, of all modern political ideologies, they (and perhaps the Jihadists) most closely resemble the behavior patterns of Nazis. For all of them are, like the Nazis and Stalinists before them, seekers of power through purity spirals."