Not bad, for Pecksland

poecksland.jpg

79 Pecksland Road, asking $3.5 million, reports a pending sale. It started off in 2016 at $3.990, so this isn’t too bad a haircut, considering Pecksland’s declining popularity. The sellers paid $5.4 million for it in 2002, but that was an Ogilvy-To-Ogilvy transaction, and values had a tendency to get a bit skewed back then, when such sales were common.

I notice that the listing describes this house as enjoying a “casual elegance”. My cousin Ed, who has made a very nice living (far better than this lawyer) providing special effects for the movie and advertising industries – think explosions, Tropicana oranges splitting in half in midair and squeezing their juice into glasses, etc.— once described his work truck as “elegant, without being overly ostentatious”. I always preferred his term over “casual”.

New Hillcrest Park listing

norton.jpg

16 Norton Lane, $2.950 million. Built in 2015. Full disclosure; the Mickster and I represent the owner. The price was set based on recent comparable sales, but we’ll see. It only came on a few hours ago and we already have two appointments to see it, so that’s encouraging; it’s evidence that at least there are active buyers in this price range, and they’re out there looking now. If you’re considering selling this spring, consider the spring market started.

I thought it’d be fun to hold a FWIW meet-up here during its public open house, which is tentatively scheduled for Sunday. The five-day forecast is for a snowstorm, in which case we’ll postpone, but long-term forecasts aren’t particularly reliable, so watch this space.

V IDEO (No, I had no say in the soundtrack — feel free to hit mute; I know I did)

I'm glad someone else has finally pointed out this hypocrisy

I’ve refrained from pointing this out, because I really don’t want to be understood as believing that an actress dressing as a sex object is inviting men to treat her as a sex object, but now another commentator has, so what the hell: if you want to be taken seriously as an “artist”, or whatever you claim to be, don’t flaunt your tits and ass.

Or other body parts.

Hello! I am Sasha, and i will be your financial advisor today, okay?

Hello! I am Sasha, and i will be your financial advisor today, okay?

Greenwich's Alexandra Bergstein quickly learns to toe the party line

And the party line is, don’t mess with the state employee union. Chris Powell, Journal Inquirer:

Meanwhile Greenwich's first Democratic state senator in nearly 90 years, Alexandra Bergstein, has gotten a telling orientation from her Democratic Senate colleagues.

Bergstein, wife of a New York investment banker, enrolled as a Democrat only in April but made good by spending nearly $300,000 of personal money on her campaign, more than triple the amount ordinarily spent under Connecticut's public campaign financing system, which Bergstein bypassed.

Striking a pose of fiscal responsibility in her campaign, Bergstein called for reforming state government's pension system. She tells the Connecticut Mirror: "I said something like, 'We have to address the pension crisis with bold, structural fixes, not just little temporary fixes.'" Whereupon she got a call from another Democratic senator-elect, Julie Kushner of Danbury, a former leader of the Working Families Party, which the government employee unions set up to run candidates against Democrats who don't take union orders.

Kushner, Bergstein said, scolded her that "people who have already taken cuts don't think about them as ‘little fixes.'" So, Bergstein said, "I immediately apologized. Point taken."

Being so new to state politics, Bergstein may not understand that those state government employees who "have already taken cuts" somehow always manage to cost more every year anyway, since the "cuts" are only reductions in the rate of increase in their compensation. But Bergstein has gotten her instructions. She now realizes that the first obligation of Democratic legislators is to serve the special interest that dominates their party, not the public. If she knows what's good for her, Bergstein will drop the pension reform stuff.

The lesson here, and one soon to be learned on a national level, is that, no matter how much a Democrat candidate pledges fealty to fiscal sanity and moderate views on other issues, she or he will bow to power, and will end up as just another shrill for the increasingly-socialist Democratic power.

Of course, that’s not considered a bug by the majority of the new crowd of “activist” voters here in Greenwich; in fact, it’s a feature.

UPDATE: Upon reflection, I realize that I should have said “agrees to”, rather than “learns to” in the headline. Bergstein is no naif, she’s a woman who’s discovered an inner thirst for political power, and if she’s already caved in to the state employees union, just days after she was sworn into office, then she’s made her choice: personal political advancement instead of principle. Another empty-suit lickspittle, though that hardly makes her unique among her fellows in either party.

Mind you, Riverside's not so much in demand that sellers can demand just any price they wish

4 Highgate Road

4 Highgate Road

Well, they can demand any price, but, as Hotspur rejoined to Glendower’s boast that he could “summon the spirits from vasty deep”, “why, so can I, or so can any man; but will they come when you do call for them?”

In any case, 4 Highgate Road, first listed in April, 2016 for $4.995 million, has today reduced its price to $3.695.

And, finally, 14 Sherwood Farm Lane closes

14 Sherwood.jpg

$2,962,500 for 14 Sherwood. This was in fact a September contract, but just closed now.

It’s been a long haul for this very-well constructed house: it started at $4.875 in June, 2009 and has been on and off — mostly on — since then. That’s the risk one takes, often, with custom houses when designed to specifically to the owner/builder’s tastes and wants.

But I’m glad to see that it’s found a buyer: nice house, even nicer owners.

There goes the narrative, and with it, the protests

oh?  well, never mind

oh? well, never mind

Houston police have arrested two black men for the murder of seven-year-old Jazmine Barnes. It now appears to have been a gang-related killing, and a possible case of mistaken identity.

The Reverend Al Sharpton must be incredibly relieved that this change in the story came before he had time to get down to Texas to join the protests by “community organizers” and assorted congressmen demanding “Justice for Jazmine”. The little girl’s murder was called “a national issue” by all the usual suspects, like this one, quoted in The Daily Beast:

Civil-rights attorney Lee Merritt, who is working with Jazmine’s family, concurs with the mother’s belief that the shooting was racially motivated and is working with community activists to make their theory known. “That’s why I was brought on,” he told The Washington Post on Wednesday. “We want to emphasize the racial nature of the attack and that hate-crime charges are appropriate.”

Obviously, the tragedy of this little girl’s death remains unabated, for those who care about the lives of children as children, and the pain of her parents is still the same, but with the switch in the story from a mysterious white triggerman to a couple of black gangbangers, I predict that the attention from our national media will end, protests will cease, and business as usual will resume. Until another pawn appears.

Contract for Sawmill Lane, just 46 days on market

88 sawmill.jpg

That’s the good news: 88 Sawmill, asking $2.8 million, has found a buyer quickly, and for a substantial price. It gets a tad more depressing from here, however, because the sellers bought it for $2.750 in 2006. Worse, when it was put back up for sale again in 2016, at $3.595 million, that listing noted,

This lovely colonial was basically rebuilt and expanded from the walls up & out in 2007 to the highest standards.

The buyer is doing very well here; the sellers, not as much.