Poor guy, he may have to join Greta on her Gaza cocktail cruise and fund raise for a new cause

If this reminds you of all “our earth is doomed” global warmist grifters, it should

UPDATE: African "Noah" purchases Mercedes, says God won't flood the earth after all (his followers are angry)

If you missed it, right before Christmas we told you about Ghanaian "prophet" who has attracted a following of thousands by building boats for the apocalypse:

"Eboh Noah" said he had built eight "arks" for his followers to take refuge during the flood. He reportedly told them to sell their possessions, donate to his ministry, and join him on the ark on Christmas day to ride out the coming of God's wrath upon the earth.

African social media accounts warned that Eboh was a grifter who previously posted all sorts of clickbait videos to the internet to try and get attention, but people didn't listen.

As you can imagine, the people who got caught up in his con are not happy. Some of them traveled hundreds of miles to be safe from the "flood" on his "arks" (he apparently filmed himself on local fishing boats that he claimed to have built).

Here was his announcement video about God sparing the earth thanks to his prayers (“you're welcome!”)

But we have $uch Good Intention$

Behold Suicidal Virtue Signaling

David Strom 12:00 PM | December 26, 2025

I keep marveling at the fact that some people (and we all know who they are) prioritize virtue signaling over actual practical results, no matter how obvious it is that they are making things worse. 

You see it all the time, in drug policies, housing, criminal justice "reform," or economic policies. San Francisco will announce some homeless policy, which makes things worse, so they double, triple, or quadruple down. Rinse, repeat. And liberals keep voting for more because it proves how much they care. 

Results? What happens on the ground in the real world? Who cares? It's all about making oneself feel virtuous. 

A great example I ran across was this story I found in The Telegraph:

Britain, which has been facing an energy crisis and very high home heating costs, has been pursuing a Net Zero policy framework that mandates reducing and eventually phasing out its North Sea fossil fuel production. It will save the Earth! 

Norway taps those very same oil reserves and sells that fuel to the British. 

Norway has announced a string of North Sea oil and gas discoveries close to UK waters.

British operators Harbour Energy and Aker BP have both made recent finds in the Norwegian North Sea close to the border with UK waters. It suggests that the region still has a wealth of potential even as Labour shuts down activity.

Norway’s Okea has discovered more oil in a field slightly closer to Norway. Meanwhile, a wildcat well drilled by state energy firm Equinor was also successful, discovering seven million barrels.

In a new report, the Norwegian Offshore Directorate described the North Sea as “the powerhouse of the Norwegian petroleum industry, with 69 fields in production”.

Norway has drilled around 45 exploratory wells in 2025, with 12 yielding commercial quantities of oil and gas. This included 30 in the North Sea of which six were economic.

The North Sea lies between Norway and the UK, and these discoveries were made just on the edge of the zone that Norway can exploit, and strongly imply (like with 99% certainty) that there is plenty of oil and gas just across that line in the UK's zone. 

The UK is pursuing a vastly different set of policies, and the results are, as you would expect, vastly different. Not so much in terms of the quantity of fossil fuels that will eventually be consumed—it's not as if Britain's policies have an appreciable impact on the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere—but in terms of the economic impact on the lives of Britons.

Its discoveries are in stark contrast to the UK sector of the North Sea, which has been hit by the Government’s 78pc total tax rate on oil and gas profits and a ban on new exploration.

The energy levies means the UK industry is now in recession, contracting at around 15pc a year and losing 1,000 jobs a month according to trade body estimates.

In October, companies operating in UK waters produced oil and gas equivalent to 33 million barrels of oil, just a fifth what it was producing in 2000 and a quarter of Norway’s current monthly output of 126 million barrels.

Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, argues that the UK’s North Sea is in inexorable decline and the country must break its reliance on fossil fuels. Some industry experts disagree, saying the UK will need oil and gas for decades to come and North Sea reserves could supply much of the country’s needs.

Strom:

The UK emits about 0.6% of global CO2 emissions, and its policies on fossil fuel production likely have an impact on reducing emissions by hundredths of a percent. 

To put this in perspective, China emits 40x as much CO2 as the UK, and per capita emissions are about double those of the UK. And those emissions keep rising, with China now accounting for roughly a third of worldwide emissions. By any practical measure, what the United Kingdom does or does not do is irrelevant. Its emissions are a rounding error. 

Despite the obvious fact that the UK's energy policies have zero impact on the climate, even if you believe all the climate alarmism, Labour is pushing policies that are impoverishing its citizens. 

All cost, zero benefit. 

Yet Norway, which is hardly run by people who are indifferent to the fate of the Earth, is dealing with reality. 

In contrast to the British policy, Norway’s official oil and gas policy aims to “provide a framework for the profitable production of oil and gas in the long term”.

The latest discovery, by Harbour Energy last week, opened up a new gas condensate field about 125 miles north-east of Shetland. Another oil discovery by Aker BP lies just over the UK/Norwegian border.

Each of the new fields is relatively small, but together they boost Norway’s output cheaply because they can be linked to existing subsea pipelines and other infrastructure.

The Norwegian Offshore Directorate report makes clear that Norway’s sector of the North Sea will remain productive for years. Much of its gas and some of its oil is destined for the UK, replacing supplies lost by the UK Government deliberately running down its own sector.

Strom:

Britain's policies only serve to make the Norwegians wealthier and Britons poorer. Oil and gas prices rise due to a smaller total supply, while Britons lose jobs, while Norwegians gain them. 

None of this requires deep thinking. You would hope a 12th grader could be shown the facts and conclude that Ed Miliband's policies are ruinous for everybody he represents. 

But none of that matters. It's all about showing one CARES about an issue. Whether one is accomplishing anything is entirely irrelevant. 

You see this sort of idiocy everywhere. Walk through Portland, Seattle, or Chicago, which are all cities run by bleeding hearts who keep on implementing policies with high-minded intentions and horrific results, and it just keeps going on. The results are irrelevant, and when you point out that things are getting worse, not better, you are the bad guy. 

We care, you don't! 

Huh? I want to make things better in the real world, not some fantasy world where that guy over there is living in a utopia in your mind, but actually pooping in the street before overdosing on fentanyl. 

Underlying all this dysfunction is an ideological foundation that leads back to Critical Theory, which holds that reality only exists in our minds and can be reshaped with words and intentions alone. That, and a healthy dose of money that somehow winds up in their pockets, of course. 

Our own approach is to award by district: a toaster oven for Mead Point purchases, a slice of bread (but artisan sourdough) for NoPo

Merry XL-mas from your broker! Rich house hunters are being baited by over-the-top closing gifts like a $3.2M Aston Martin and a 31-foot yacht

Champagne and fruit baskets are for suckers.

Well-heeled buyers on the hunt for big-ticket homes expect more — and luxury brokers are sating them with increasingly personal, unique and often mind-bogglingly extravagant closing gifts.

These days, brokers are giving their buyers lavish dinners in their new addresses with private chefs and original works of art. What’s more, they’ve even gifted them custom scents and music compositions commissioned for the residence, antiques, Hermès accoutrements, Louis Vuitton duffle bags with custom engravings and country club memberships.

Some sales even feature wheel-y eye-opening extras: an available $59 million penthouse in Miami comes with a $3.2 million sports car, while a just-sold $12.7 million Lake Tahoe home included an $80,000 Tesla Cybertruck. 

“I have given 10-foot-high safes, Chanel bags, [and put] a Bentley in the garage of an estate,” said a Palm Beach, Florida, broker who requested anonymity.

So who’s the sucker, really?

But not every broker in the luxury market is sold. South Florida Compass agent Michael Martirena called the phenomenon “extremely gimmicky” and “distasteful.”

“High net-worth individuals, they’re savvy, and these gimmicks scream like a red flag to be quite honest,” he said. “People want to get a concession, a credit and get a better deal in the number. They’re fully capable of buying their own cars. I love getting gifts that I would never buy for myself, but at the end of the day, they’re paying for it. So it’s not really a gift.”

Martirena said that the more extravagant the “gift,” the more likely it is to be built into the listing price. He said it’s not uncommon for buyers to negotiate a discount on a property by forgoing those gifts, add-ons and extras. And because big-ticket items like luxury cars are often reflected in the closing price, a resale without that item could actually lower the sticker value of the home.

As a side note, I found this bit of hypocrisy among the eco-conscious, five-home-owning, Lear Jet set amusing

Across the country, in Clear Creek Tahoe — a luxury development within Lake Tahoe’s premier mountain and golf gated community — broker Mike Dunn said he recently sold a $12.7 million new home thanks to the inclusion of a Tesla Cybertruck at close. (Those massive electric vehicles sell for about $80,000.)

Not only did the five-bedroom home come with more standard amenities like a golf simulator, a 12-person Jacuzzi and a six-car subterranean garage — but it was also built using Tesla’s solar roof and power-walls, including a battery storage system and generators allowing it to run fully off-grid.

“We’re selling Tahoe, not just real estate,” said Dunn, of Chase International Luxury Real Estate. “We’re selling the lifestyle here that people desire: enjoying the outdoors, recreation, wellness and having a place to create lasting family memories. There’s also a strong emphasis on the environment and this is the first whole Tesla home in the area. So we incentivized the sale with the Tesla Cybertruck.”

Mi Casas No Es Tu Casa

And what’s our favorite Connecticut senator doing to stop this brutality? Teaming up with the equally slimy Adam Schiff.

Murphy, Schiff Introduce Bill To Keep Border Patrol Agents At Our Borders And Out Of Our Cities

December 18, 2025

WASHINGTON—U.S. Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) today introduced the Keeping Our Agents On The Line Act, a bill to improve border security by ensuring that Border Patrol Agents are not diverted from their work at U.S. borders and reassigned to operations deep in the American interior.

Waaaay back in 2024, Murphy repeatedly insisted that only new legislation could address the border crisis because the president lacked the authority to do so using only his executive powers. Here’s just one example from may, 2024:

"The reality is President Biden needs that legislation because it is just not true that he has the existing authority to issue executive actions that get the border under control," Murphy said, reiterating the Democratic view that Republicans should be to blame for the border.

Now that Trump’s proved him wrong, Murphy’s doing everything he can to undo the damage and bring back Pablo to wash the Senator’s cars and tend his gardens. “There’s only so much I can ask my interns to do”, he whines.

Forget your harmless lump of coal, the Austrians really know how to keep little miscreants in line

A good friend of mine, Ferdinand Steyer, compiled this video of how they celebrate Christmas in his native Austria. Yes, St. Nicholas parades into town bringing gifts for the children who’ve behaved themselves during the year, but he’s accompanied by the Devil and his minions to punish naughty boys and girls. “If you can survive that terror as a 7-year-old”, Ferdinand assures me, “you can survive anything.” I believe him.

I can’t get the YouTube to work on this post, for some reason, but do check on the link — it’s well worth it.

Bah, humbug; let other bloggers post cheerful, reverent, and grateful notes today — I am all three of those, but I have an image to maintain, so I'll focus on the annoying and pestilent.

(Besides, it’s more fun.) That said, I do wish everyone a Merry Christmas.

Benjamin Bartee, PJ Media:

War on Christmas 2025: The Red-Green Alliance (Not the Festive Color Scheme)

The war against Christmas and the legacy Western culture it represents rages on. Here’s the news from the front.

Hijab lady issues anti-Christmas tree fatwa

Before any Muslim comes to me in the comments and tells me [putting up Christmas trees] is part of British culture and it’s okay, please go and do your research. Honestly, if the reverts can do it… honestly, you have no excuses. And if you’re that Muslim that was going to put up a tree this year, please take it as your sign… You do not have to exchange gifts, you do not have to put up a Christmas tree, you don’t have to do any of it. Honestly, take it as a day off.

*”Revert” is a term that Muslim propagandists use to refer to converts, intended to convey that everyone is a natural Muslim and thus “conversion” is actually “reversion’ to the natural state of submission to Allah. 

Honestly, as a rule of thumb, you can’t trust anyone who inserts “honestly” unnecessarily into every other sentence out of their mouths.

Not satisfied to not put them up in their own homes, apparently the sight of Christmas trees in public is even too much for the migrants to tolerate, ironically, in the tolerant and multicultural EU, as the Brussels bureaucrats are always banging on about.

A now a word from the covetous and lazy. Pro-tip: if you’re buying a single, $500 gift for your child, you aren’t marshalling your resources wisely.

‘I hate Christmas,’ declares septum piercing girl in TikTok video

“Leftists and migrants, as we’ll see, are of one mind on the Christmas issue.

…. [D]oes everything have to be politicized? Must every holiday be run through the Social Justice™ prism, so that a day commemorating Jesus’ birth becomes a class war battlefield?”

I'm literally sitting at f***ing work, trying not to lose my f***ing s**t because I am so over this g****mn holiday. I hate Christmas! I f***in' HATE it. And if you're f***in poor, you probably also hate Christmas because this is a f***in rich people holiday and it's impossible to enjoy if you don't have f***in money. Someone came in here today and told me that they spent $500 on a light up deer. What? What? I'm literally struggling to pay for the one thing my child wants for Christmas, which is $500, and people are spending that on f***in decor.

Oops! Forgot to add this one, noted in TownHall: Politico’s editors complain that conservatives are ruining the Left’s favorite secular holiday:

The man who would be King (Karl)

Your next president, Kamrad Noisome, wants your land — you, he’ll dispose of as he sees fit

40-acres and a mule: Agricultural “reparations” in the once-great state of California

Begee Welborn, HotAir:

Newsom Wants to Take Away the Farm

For a peek into how California Governor Gavin Newsom would rule the country if elected President, look no further than his California Agricultural Land Equity Task Force. This ambiguous agency was buried within the state budget in 2022 during Newsom’s statewide Covid lockdown, when media was not allowed near the governor or Legislature.

“Established in the California Budget Act of 2022 (AB 179, Ting), the California Agricultural Land Equity Task Force is an independent 13-member body directed to ‘submit a report (by Jan. 1, 2026) to the Legislature and Governor…that includes a set of policy recommendations on how to address the agricultural land equity crisis.’”

The report the Equity Task Force recently released recommending a land grab from white farmers reads like a “How To” Marxism 101 manual at UC Berkeley.

One of their primary grievances is that “demographic trends in landownership differ greatly from those of agricultural labor in California;” i.e. not enough farm workers own the land on which they work.

By that logic, not enough teachers own the schools where they teach, or not enough dockworkers own the ships they load and unload.

This is their definition of agricultural land equity:

Agricultural land equity is when all people have secure and affordable access to viable land for the care, relationship with, and cultivation of food, fiber, medicine, and cultural resources without systemic barriers, disparities, or exploitation.”

A Michigan Farm News article ran down some of the pretty harrowing options outlined in the task force's recommendations, which were later approved by the California legislature to expand farmland ownership among various minorities and tribes.

The “Golden State” — known as the epicenter for far-reaching and ill-informed initiatives, including the infamous Prop. 12 that banned gestation stalls and required cage-free housing for egg-producing chickens — appears poised to solidify that reputation, yet again.

...Approved by legislators in the California Budget Act of 2022, the 13-member task force is proposing several steps to redistribute agricultural land to “socially disadvantaged farmers,” claiming “diversity” will result in ecological benefits, environmental protection, and climate resiliency

The proposal recommends several actions that would apply exclusively to certain minorities through the support and incentivization of:

  • The development of local ordinances that would restrict the purchase of land unless you are a certain minority.The purchase of private land by the state and other non-profits under the guise of agricultural land preservation and only offer leases to certain minority farmers after the purchase.

  • Exclusive leasing of existing state lands to certain minorities.

  • Exclusive funding for acquisition of agricultural land by certain minorities.

  • Exclusive tax credits to certain minorities for not only agricultural land but also infrastructure and student loans.

  • Transferring public land exclusively to tribes.

  • Transferring private land specifically to tribes, specifically to African Americans living in California, and exclusively to certain other minorities.

  • Debt forgiveness for only certain minorities.

  • The development of zoning laws that require “equitable” land access and specific climate-related agricultural practices.

  • The prioritization of conservation programs for certain minority farmers over other farmers.

Katie Grimes sees all sorts of ghastly outcomes if the state goes forward with this. Obviously, the first is that more precious, dwindling farmland is lost. She points out that for all the progressive pablum about the 'traditional stewards of the land, ' California's tribes aren't farmers - they own casinos.

And here are sone of Oakland’s Future Farmers of America stocking up in preparation for their new careers on confiscated land

Tenant farmers working their former farm, now Indian land: