Waiting for Dr. Goodbar

From Week in Pictures: an old one, but still fun:


And yes, I thought I remembered it, but I did check: it’s a real quote:

AI Overview

Yes, this claim is accurate. A 2021 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) strategic plan from the Duke University School of Medicine titled "Dismantling Racism and Advancing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in the School of Medicine" identifies standards related to timeliness as characteristics of "white supremacy culture".

New York Post +1

Key Details of the Report:

  • Timeliness and Professionalism: The document asserts that standard workplace expectations—including dress codes, specific speech patterns, work styles, and timeliness—implicitly privilege whiteness and can disadvantage non-white individuals.

    American Council of Trustees and Alumni

  • Perfectionism and Individualism: The framework categorizes characteristics like "perfectionism," "power hoarding," and "individualism" as elements of so-called "white supremacy culture".

    American Council of Trustees and Alumni

  • Purpose of the Guide: The medical school formulated this plan to catalyze anti-racist practices and create a more equitable workforce, which was praised by the school's leadership at the time of its release.

    New York Post

Liars, liars, pants on fire

I post on this fraud every summer, showing the weather maps that are now displayed in hysterical red vs the neutral colors used for the same temperatures before Al Gore warmed up the planet, charts showing that the “record temperatures” in cities like Portland, Oregon and Bangor, Maine, were actually set in the early 1900s, not the past few summers, and so on. Here’s this year’s:

And:

Meteorologist Chris Martz calls bullshit:

And from PJMedia:

It’s Them Again: Climate Alarmists Are Trying to Scare You With Their Panicky Maps

In the course of some of the media coaching I’ve done in recent years, there is one slide that always gets the same reaction, which is a sort of surprise and an affirmation at the same time. I use it to illustrate media bias and manipulation. It shows the same German TV meteorologist standing in front of the same map five years apart, on June 21 in both cases, with roughly the same temperatures on the map behind her. Outside of her outfit and hairstyle, the only noticeable change is the color of the map behind her.

The old map from 2017 uses a graphics package that emphasizes normal colors for a forested country like Germany – different shades of green. The temperature numbers are reversed out in white.

Five years later, on June 21, 2022, the map is saturated with gawdy shades of bright red, orange, and yellow. It looks like someone had a bad meal at Taco Bell and got sick.

Visually, the difference between the two maps is the contrast between calm and normalcy, and hyper-alarmism. If the graphics could talk, the 2017 map tells you to relax, while the 2022 version is screaming at you to panic, and to do it now.

Actually, if you study the numbers, the temps are mostly higher on the green map than they are on the puke map.

If you’re wondering when the climate alarmists took over the news business, that’s your window. It didn’t hurt that in between these two dates, we lived through a global pandemic, and news operations worldwide learned how to use the power of fear to drive TV ratings, clicks, and shares.

And so, here we are, once again in late June. Let’s check in once again on those temperatures. In Frankfurt, on June 30, 2026, it’s 84 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s kind of amazing, considering that the internet is flooded with reports that Europeans from France to Italy and Germany are melting due to their own refusal or their leaders’ refusal to allow them to use air conditioning.

In 2022, on the Taco Bell-puke map, it was 80 degrees Fahrenheit. And in 2017, on the same date, in Frankfurt, it was 96 degrees Fahrenheit. 

Hold on! Isn’t that on the nice, calm, green map? Isn’t that on the map that no one remembers because the world wasn’t coming to an end in Germany in 2017? But that means it was hotter then in the same German town than it is now. What’s changed?

Mainly, the climate alarmists are in charge now, and they like their maps red, bright red, orange, bright orange, and yellow, bright yellow. No other colors will do.

No, Virginia, Heat Waves are Not More Common

A bit of hard data as the Virginia and national media go into hysterics over a very typical Virginia heat wave and repeat endlessly the claim that this is becoming more frequent.  Uh, no, no it’s not. From the CO2 Coalition’s recent updated compilation on “climate stability” in Virginia, worth reading and sharing. While you are staying out of this heat, obviously. (Everything I know about heat safety I learned in kindergarten, at Edwards AFB in the Mohave).  — SDH

Airports and temperature readings

England is doing it:

The climate scaremongers: Junk sites behind the Met Office’s so-called heat records

LAST week was even hotter than the summer of 1976, or at least that is what the Met Office keeps telling us. Is that really the case, though?

It was certainly extremely hot for a few days. We were inundated with daily claims of temperature records being broken, forecasts that temperatures could get close to 40C or 104F (they did not) and the obligatory red heat warnings informing us we might die if we step outside our front doors.

But where is the evidence that this heatwave was even more extreme than in 1976? Most people who remember the 1970s would probably say the Met Office is gaslighting us.

In 1976, temperatures hit 35.9C (96.6F) in Cheltenham on July 3. The Met Office reckons that this temperature was exceeded last week.

Top of the list are Lingwood and Santon Downham, both in Norfolk, which they say recorded 37.7C (99.8F) and 37.3C (99.1F) on Friday, a record for June. Santon Downham in Norfolk is, however, one of the most poorly sited weather stations in the country, even by the Met Office’s abysmal standards. It is a Class 5 site, the worst category, which the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) says can add up to 5C of artificial warming. In other words, the temperature at Santon Downham might have been as low as 32.3C (90F) if it had been properly sited.

Lingwood, another Class 5, is even worse. It is just a few yards from a thick bank of trees and surrounded on the other three sides by tall hedges. It is a perfect sun-trap as there is no air circulation.

Class 5s mop up all the stations that don’t meet the criteria to be a Class 4, itself a junk classification. The WMO is absolutely clear – Class 5 sites should not be used for climatological purposes, which is exactly what the Met Office have done here.

Just behind Santon Downham came RAF Wattisham in Suffolk. It is now used as an Army helicopter base, flying Apaches. Wattisham, as with all airfield sites, is criss-crossed with runways, and is home to 2,000 troops, 300 HGVs, 200 Land Rovers and two air ambulances. Hardly a suitable rural site!

On the Thursday, the two highest temperatures were set at RAF Merryfield and RAF Yeovilton, two Royal Navy helicopter bases close together in Somerset. The latter is described by the Navy as ‘one of the busiest military airfields in the UK’.

Maybe you are seeing a pattern here! The day before, on the Wednesday, the Met Office claimed a June record of 36.1C (97F) in Gosport at, you guessed it, yet another helicopter airbase.

It says a lot about the predominance of junk sites in the Met Office’s station network. It also says a lot about helicopters. We are familiar with the artificial warming effect of tarmac runways, but helicopters add another factor – rotor wash. In essence, the rotors push the air downwards during take-off and landing, and that air includes hot exhaust gases. When this air hits the ground, it spreads outward in all directions, creating winds that can easily reach 60 to 100 mph. An excellent way, therefore, of spreading hot air around the airfield. It is well accepted that thermometers at airfields are there so that pilots know the actual conditions on the runway and should never be used as being representative of the wider area.

In fact, no pristine weather station beat the 1976 record of 35.9C. The Met Office claims of record temperatures are wholly derived from junk sites.

And we’re doing it in Connecticut:

Heat dome will make Connecticut feel like it's 114 degrees Friday as heat wave continues

The temperature reached 100 degrees Thursday at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks [where Hartford’s temperature is measured]  breaking the previous daily heat record of 99 degrees that had stood since 1966, according to the National Weather Service. Temperatures came close to record highs in Bridgeport [as measured at Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport — Ed] but fell short.

Highs are forecast to reach 100 at Bradley and 101 in Bridgeport Friday, potentially setting new temperature records again.

Spoiler alert: No


Did People In The Middle Ages Really Believe The Earth Was Flat?

In 1828, Washington Irving published The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus, a book of fiction that many later took as historical fact. Among the book’s chapters, Irving gave readers a scene they could not forget: Columbus sitting before King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella’s learned men, facing down monks, theologians, and scholastics who supposedly clung to Scripture while he alone saw the truth of a round world.

In this version of alternate history, Columbus set sail on his epic voyage to the Americas to prove to the world that the Earth was not flat.

It’s an appealing myth that even made its way into some school textbooks. But it’s false.

Educated Europeans during the Renaissance and before that in the Medieval Age already knew the world was round. Aristotle had argued for that nearly 1,800 years earlier. Eratosthenes had measured the planet’s circumference in the third century BCE. Medieval scholars such as Bede, Thomas Aquinas, Roger Bacon, Albertus Magnus, and Johannes de Sacrobosco all worked within a spherical-Earth tradition, and used it to explain eclipses, daylight, climate and the motion of stars.

The myth that “medieval people thought the world was flat” says less about the Middle Ages than about the modern world that invented the Middle Ages as a foil: dirty, dark, ignorant, credulous and waiting to be rescued by 19th-century science.

Educated Europeans during the Renaissance and before that in the Medieval Age already knew the world was round. Aristotle had argued for that nearly 1,800 years earlier. Eratosthenes had measured the planet’s circumference in the third century BCE. Medieval scholars such as Bede, Thomas Aquinas, Roger Bacon, Albertus Magnus, and Johannes de Sacrobosco all worked within a spherical-Earth tradition, and used it to explain eclipses, daylight, climate and the motion of stars.

The myth that “medieval people thought the world was flat” says less about the Middle Ages than about the modern world that invented the Middle Ages as a foil: dirty, dark, ignorant, credulous and waiting to be rescued by 19th-century science.

Round Earth Was Figured Out Thousands of Years Ago

By the fourth century B.C., Aristotle had gathered several lines of evidence that suggested the world was spherical. During a lunar eclipse, Earth cast a round shadow on the moon, he observed. Travelers moving north or south saw different stars. Ships vanished hull-first over the horizon.

Then, around 240 B.C., Eratosthenes, working in Alexandria, did something much more ambitious. He estimated the size of the planet using the shadow cast by a stick as a ruler.

He had heard that in Syene, near modern Aswan in southern Egypt, the sun behaved strangely at noon on the summer solstice. It stood so high overhead that sunlight reached the bottom of a deep well and a vertical stick cast little or no shadow. Farther north, in Alexandria, the same thing did not happen. At noon on the same day, a vertical stick still cast a shadow.

Sunlight travels to Earth in nearly parallel rays. So, if the sun stood directly overhead in Syene but not in Alexandria, the ground itself had to be curving away between the two cities. Eratosthenes measured the angle of the Alexandrian shadow at about 7.2 degrees. That is one fiftieth of a full circle.

From there, the logic was simple and brilliant. If the distance from Syene to Alexandria covered one fiftieth of Earth’s curve, then the full circumference of Earth must be 50 times that distance. Ancient surveyors put the distance between the cities at about 5,000 stadia or 5,000 Greek stadiums (800 to 925 kilometers). Eratosthenes multiplied 5,000 by 50 and arrived at roughly 250,000 stadia for Earth’s circumference.

The exact modern equivalent depends on how long his “stade” was, and historians still debate that unit. But using a common estimate, his figure comes out to about 39,000 to 40,000 kilometers. Modern calculations put Earth’s circumference at about 40,008 kilometers around the poles and about 40,075 kilometers around the equator. In other words, Eratosthenes came surprisingly close to the true figure more than 2,000 years ago using a stick and his wit alone.

When the centralized Roman government fell, this vital knowledge did not vanish. It was inherited by the Medieval fractured kingdoms that came after. In the East, Islamic scholars preserved, translated, and refined classical Greek texts. Those people were much smarter than we often give them credit for, and so they were also convinced that the earth was a sphere.

What Medieval Scholars Actually Said

Educated Medieval people inherited this knowledge and even explained it at length in some of their writings.

The Venerable Bede, the English monk and scholar, wrote around 723: “The reason why the same days are of unequal length,” he wrote circa 723 CE, “is the roundness of the Earth, for not without reason is it called ‘the orb of the world’ … It is, in fact, a sphere set in the middle of the whole universe. It is not merely circular like a shield [or] spread out like a wheel, but resembles more a ball, being equally round in all directions.”

By the 13th century, this was standard teaching. Johannes de Sacrobosco’s De sphaera mundi, written around 1230, became one of Europe’s most influential astronomy textbooks. It described Earth as a sphere and used familiar evidence: stars visible at different latitudes, eclipses observed at different times, and the way sailors could see farther from the top of a mast. The work was copied in manuscripts, printed in many editions and studied for centuries in pre-Copernican universities.

Thomas Aquinas, Albertus Magnus, Roger Bacon and other major medieval thinkers accepted a spherical Earth. They were wrong about many things by modern standards. For instance, most accepted a geocentric cosmos, with Earth fixed at the center. But few scholars of merit claimed the Earth was flat.

Even Dante’s Divine Comedy assumes a spherical planet. Dante and Virgil pass through the center of Earth, where gravity reverses, and emerge toward the opposite hemisphere. That scene makes no sense on a flat disc.

So Why Do Medieval Maps Look Flat?

The Hereford mappa mundi, a map of the world with Jerusalem at its center. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

One reason the myth may have taken off was that Medieval world maps, or mappae mundi, often show the known world as a circle. To some eyes, that can look like the people who drew them ascribed to a flat-Earth geography.

But these maps were not meant to be used for navigation or to make a scientific point.

The Hereford Mappa Mundi, made around 1300, was a religious and encyclopedic manuscript. It placed Jerusalem near the center and filled the world with biblical scenes, mythical beasts, peoples and cities. This map and others like it from the Middle Ages were based on theology.

However, a circular drawing of the known world at the time by its maker does not mean the artist thought the planet was a pancake.

Because faith drove their worldview, medieval Europeans accepted the Ptolemaic model of the universe. This system placed the Earth — and specifically Jerusalem — at the center of all creation. The planets, the sun, and the stars all revolved around humanity. While factually incorrect, this Earth-centric model required a deep understanding of predictable planetary movements. Essentially, it entirely relied on the Earth being a sphere.

Coolidge on the 4th: No wonder college professors hate him, and teach their stuent to venerate America's first "progressive" Herbert Hoover and FDR (Updated)

Scott Johnson, PowerLine:

From 150 to 250, this truth abides

President Calvin Coolidge celebrated the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1926, with a speech providing a magisterial review of the history and thought underlying the Declaration. His speech on the occasion deserves to be read and studied in its entirety. The following paragraph, however, is particularly relevant to the challenge that confronts us in the variants of the progressive dogma that pass themselves off today as the higher wisdom:

About the Declaration there is a finality that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning can not be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.

Read the whole thing here. (Posted annually since 2004.)

UPDATE: Just saw this

Oooh, that Evil Trump: he was using his FBI to spy on Newsom in 2024, before he’d even won the election, let alone taken office

“We were only pretending to hate Trump — the Mar-a-Lago raid was just a smokescreen”

Catharine Salgado, PJMedia:

FBI Had a Mole in Newsom’s Inner Circle

Gov. Gavin Newsom of California had a top affiliate who was recording evidence related to the Democrat governor’s corrupt chief-of-staff, Dana Williamson. And since this began under the Biden administration, it could be old Joe or maybe Kamala Harris who was keeping tabs on a future presidential rival.

Newsom recently ignited a firestorm of controversy by asserting that President Donald Trump was conducting a personal and totally unjustified campaign of persecution against him and his wife, Jennifer, through the Department of Justice. But in fact, the FBI has been investigating members of the Democrat presidential hopeful’s inner circle, including his wife, since before Trump even took office, back when Joe Biden was president (sort of). Indeed, it now seems that the FBI had a plant wearing a wire around Newsom since mid-2024.

Democrat insider Alexis Podesta was secretly recording conversations during the investigation into Williamson, according to information that the California Post obtained. Newsom’s disgraced chief of staff pleaded guilty to federal fraud and tax charges in May of this year.

From the Post:

The revelation she was wearing a wire as far back as June 2024 explains why a swath of Sacramento political insiders and lobbyists were stunned to receive FBI letters last fall informing them that their phone calls had been intercepted during the investigation — despite many having little or no connection to Williamson.

“Alexis wore a wire, and Dana did not,” said McGregor Scott, Williamson’s lawyer and a former US attorney for the Eastern District of California, which is now investigating the Newsoms.

Salgado:

Newsom has been using the federal investigation into his family and affiliates as a fundraising tool for a political action committee. In other words, he is not only shameless about corruption close to him, but he is also quite literally using his possible criminality as a selling point to donors.

And because I’m lazy, here’s Google:


AI Overview

California Governor Gavin Newsom publicly accused President Donald Trump of directing the FBI and IRS to conduct a politically motivated investigation into him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. He stated in a June 15, 2026 video statement that federal agents were aggressively questioning their family, friends, and former employees in an attempt to find a crime.

Newsom tied the federal probe to his potential 2028 presidential bid, alleging that Trump is weaponizing the Department of Justice against his political adversaries. While the specific focus of the investigation remains undisclosed by federal authorities, sources have indicated that parts of the inquiry involve Siebel Newsom's taxes and the activities of her nonprofit.

Our junior senator is at it again

Kathy Smith, Greenwichwise.com A new, at least to me, website covering Greenwich news and issues, with commentary. Great site.

Feeling Lonely? Don't Worry, CT Senator Chris Murphy has a Campaign Strategy for That

It’s not the crushing despair you feel when you open your skyrocketing tax and utility bills. It’s not the immediate dread of driving past yet another automated speed camera. No, according to Chris Murphy, Connecticut’s junior Democratic U.S. Senator, America is facing a completely different kind of emergency.

Minister for Loneliness?

Instead of focusing his energy in Washington on inflation, energy costs, or the real-world problems of his constituents, Senator Murphy has thrown his weight behind a new legislative push: the National Strategy for Social Connection Act (NSSCA).

The goal of the NSSCA? As Murphy puts it, the bill will "create a comprehensive national response to epidemic levels of social isolation." But this isn’t just about making friends; Murphy is framing it as a geopolitical emergency. "It's a full-blown crisis for our democracy... causing mass polarization and dysfunction in our politics," he warns.

To solve this existential threat, the bill proposes a classic Washington solution: more bureaucracy. It would create a brand-new Office of Social Connection Policy to advise the President and force government agencies to "integrate social connections" into their daily operations. To justify the move, Murphy’s statement points across the globe, highlighting that both Japan and the United Kingdom have already created their own "Ministers for Loneliness" to battle the issue.

Money for Loneliness (and votes)

Tied right alongside this effort is Murphy’s sister bill, the SILO Act, which puts serious taxpayer teeth into this agenda. It carves out $62.5 million in annual federal grant funding to be handed over to "community-based organizations." In plain English? It’s a massive, multi-million dollar federal slush fund for politically active NGOs and non-profits tasked with teaching Americans how to mingle (especially during elections).

Between the Lines: With an eye clearly on national ambitions and building an anti-Trump platform for a future presidential run, Murphy seems determined to find an "epidemic" that requires federal mandates, taxpayer cash and community-based army of new voters. Anything to avoid solving the practical, everyday problems of the people who elected them.

Story here

Which was the point of converting colleges into indoctrination centers in the first place

The Battle for America’s Unconscious Mind: The Frankfurt School

The psychology behind the Left’s cultural long march

Education was a primary target of the long march strategy. If students could be simply immersed in the leftist worldview with the enforced absence of contradictory perspectives, they would, over time, take those ideas with them into the other institutions of society and the Left’s revolution would succeed without a shot being fired.

Better'n Ozempic

DEMOCRATS INSISTED ON SHUTTERING THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PREMATURELY AND WITHOUT A REPLACEMENT, AND HERE THEY ARE NOW:

It’s not irrational, so much as it’s virtue signalling, and another step, so to speak, towards instilling a permanent panic over global warming in the minds of the peasants.