When I want an objective, dispassionate opinion on the Constitution, Pamala Karlan is not who I'd call

Thief, thief, thief! Trump! We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!

Thief, thief, thief! Trump! We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!

But that was the point in brining her in to testify in the first place. Yesterday, Ms. Karlan dragged Trump’s 13-year-old boy into the circus. She’s an all-hater, all-the-time opponent of Trump, and has been since at least his election. Vile woman.

“I came in from the airport yesterday and I got off the bus from Dulles down at L’Enfant Plaza and I walked up to the hotel and as I was walking past what used to be the old post office building and is now Trump hotel," Karlan told an audience in 2017. “I had to cross the street, of course.” 

Fellow panelist, Neil Siegel, asked: “Are you staying there?”

“God, no! Never!” Karlan responded. 

On Wednesday, Karlan drew ire from the White House, the Trump campaign and even First Lady Melania Trump after using 13-year-old Barron Trump’s name to illustrate her point that President Trump can’t rule like a king. 

"The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron," Karlan told the committee, prompting chuckles across the room.