I hate america

/

Miss Angel Kelly labored as a staff attorney for the NY Port Authority before the Democrats discovered this “three-for-one”: Female, Black, and Asian — and simultaneously her legal acumen and put her on the local bench. The aptitude she displayed on a state district court was enough to get her nominated to the federal judiciary — did I mention she was female, black, and Asian? Confirmed, barely, in 2021 by the Democrat majority, she has been busy lately issuing nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration for anything she finds offensive to her sensibilities. She was at it again on Friday.

Biden Judge orders Trump admin to restore National Park changes at sites that ‘disparaged’ US

A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to restore sites changed under an executive order calling for the nation’s museums, parks and landmarks to not display elements that “inappropriately disparage Americans past or living.”

The preliminary injunction issued by US District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts also orders a pause on any additional changes, writing that the plaintiffs have shown that these efforts are meant “to rewrite the Nation’s history with a white-out pen.”

“History cannot be faithfully told while excluding the experiences of communities whose contributions, struggles, and achievements form an important part of our Nation’s story,” the judge wrote.

The Trump administration must also provide a status report every week describing the progress they’ve made with these changes, the judge wrote.

Here’s how the Associated Press “reports” the story with its own particular slant we’ve all come to know and admire:

The order comes in response to a February lawsuit filed by conservation and historical organizations over National Park Service policies that the groups say have forced park service staff to remove or censor dozens of exhibits that share factually accurate and relevant US history and scientific knowledge, including about slavery and climate change.

What? No gay pride flags in front of basalt bubbles? The outrage!

Other changes included removing a sign at Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument in Arizona describing basalt bubbles because it had an image of a visitor holding a Pride flag while films on labor history were removed from the Lowell National Historical Park in Massachusetts.

Here’s a different take, from PowerLine’s John Hinderaker:

Anti-Americanism: It’s the Law!

That’s what one federal judge says, anyway. In May 2025, implementing an Executive Order by President Trump, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum directed the National Parks to do several things. First, to “identify any public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties…on lands within its jurisdiction that have been removed or changed from January 1, 2020, through the date of this Order…” and determine whether such “alteration or removal of each property was made to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history; inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures; or include any other improper partisan ideology.” If so, the status quo ante the Biden administration was to be restored.

Further, to “review…all public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties on lands within its jurisdiction to identify whether any such properties contain images, descriptions, depictions, messages, narratives or other information (content) that inappropriately disparages Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times), or, with respect to content describing natural features, that emphasizes matters unrelated to the beauty, abundance, or grandeur of said natural feature.” Such inappropriate–i.e., anti-American–content was to be removed.

This was too much for the Democratic Party. In a collusive lawsuit, a Democratic Party district court judge in Massachusetts enjoined implementation of Burgum’s order. So the national parks must disparage America, and anything done by the Biden administration cannot be undone by the Trump administration.

Is that really the law? Of course not. Law professor Ilan Wurman comments: