Back from the dead: Jordan Saper McMansion has resurfaced on the MLS

170 Old Mill Road, built by developer Jordan Saper back in the biggerbetterbrighterwider boom days of the early 2000s, has again put up for sale, this time for $8.495 million, only slightly less than the $8.850 million (on a $9.4 ask) it sold for new in 2006.

2006 proved the high water mark for this specimen of the builder’s craft, with subsequent sales dropping ever lower:

  • 2015, $4.9 million (started at $7.795 February 2012)

  • 2020, $4.270 million (started at $5.495 2019)

This time things may be different. The agent’s hauled in The Zebra, and has been careful to ensure that no bookshelves, anywhere, have been brought into the house since Saper’s day. So, somethiing familiar, and nothing scary; could work.

as an ironic reference to the last generation’s bookshelves, two Memento Nooks have been created, suitable for displaying club tennis championship trophies (purchased, if need be) and Greenwich Academy leadership awards (also Available on EBay)

Actual, you-bet-it's-genuine video of Democrat/DSA convention, July 29, 2026

Government (not) at work: Six years after deciding to replace the (tiny) Byram River Bridge, the DESIGN work is "expected" to be finished in 2027, “unless it takes longer".

And when might it actually be built? “Oh c’mon, man, don’t ask embarrassing questions.”

Connecticut, New York lawmakers push to speed up Greenwich flood-control bridge project

GREENWICH —

Connecticut's Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy and Rep. Jim Himes, D-4th District, along with New York's Rep. George Latimer, D-6th District, sent a letter to the commander of the New York district of the Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Eric Swenson, last week to urge the replacement of two bridges they say are long overdue.

….Improvements were authorized years ago, yet the projects remain unfinished, according to the federal officials. 

First Selectman Fred Camillo said he’s been working with various entities involved with the bridge replacements for years.

“I share the frustration because we worked really hard to get this project moving and done as quickly as possible, without any shortcuts being taken, and then to hear that there’s been another delay is extremely frustrating,” he said. “I support the effort by the federal officials to advocate to the federal government to get this project started and completed.”

In 2020, the Army Corps of Engineers completed a Byram River Basin Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study, which recommended removing and replacing both the West Putnam Avenue and Hillside Avenue bridges because they were major contributors to flooding the area.

[Blumenthal, Murphy and Himes] said they are “extremely disappointed to learn that the project schedule has slipped once again.”

The current projection has the design not being completed until 2027 and more funding may be necessary to complete the design phase, which the group called “deeply concerning,” particularly considering Congress approved the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act specifically to move authorized projects from planning to construction.

Ah, progress! The original bridge, built in an eara before the EPA and its ever-accelerating,massive regulations (all of which are fiercely defended by this Democrat trio of bozos) moved from proposal to design to completion in less than one year in 1888-1889.

How do we know that? Because of one very small, but typical time-consuming component of the current delay, a requirement that the history of the bridge be researched and a report prepared: They

As per the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the New York and Connecticut State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs), the Corps of Engineers is required to provide a publication for public distribution that summarizes the historical research completed as part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) documentation of the bridges. For information on the history of the Route 1 Bridges (also referred to as the Byram River Bridges), please read A Brief History of the Byram River Bridges.

Byram Bridge (1888) At the request of Westchester County, J.A. Kirby, Port Chester’s village engineer, developed two bid options for the new bridge, which was to be either an iron truss or a stone arch. Although bridge building companies had developed low priced, mass-produced, industrially manufactured rolled iron shapes, which were cheaper and easier to erect, the lowest bid was for a new stone arch bridge submitted by contractor William McCabe of Mamaroneck, New York. The two-span stone-arch bridge was constructed for $14,750.00, [$535,000 in current dollars —ed] which was $127 cheaper than the lowest iron truss option. After completion in early 1889, the bridge quickly became a regional landmark associated with the “Gateway to New England” because it straddled the Byram River along the Boston Post Road, the principal route between New York and Connecticut. Because of its popularity along the Boston Post Road, the bridge was also featured on early 20th-century postcards and admired for its elegant arches and rusticated masonry. The bridge was widened in 1911 to accommodate an increase in traffic and dedicated sidewalks were added at this time.

What’s all this going to cost (before overruns)?

AI Overview

The overall estimated cost for the Byram River flood mitigation and bridge replacement project (targeting the Route 1 bridges near the Greenwich, CT and Port Chester, NY border) is $35 million for construction, alongside a $5.47 million pre-construction engineering and design (PED) phase. [1, 2, 3]

Project Cost Breakdown

  • Design & Pre-construction Phase: $5.47 million (100% federally funded).

  • Construction Phase: Estimated at $35 million, cost-shared 50% by the federal government and 50% non-federal sponsors.

  • Local Town Capital Allocation: Greenwich's local capital budget inputs feature targeted segments (such as initial municipal allocations around $4 million) toward advancing the local share of the bridge and flood work. [1, 2, 3]

Fun Fact: While you’re contemplating the sorry mess our massive regulatory system of government has become, crushing both new construction and maintenance of our infrastructure, here’s a look at two projects that you may hqave heard of, each built before the power to control those actives was surrendered by Congress and state legislatures to agency bureaucrats and private, evirnomental special interest groups:

The Empire State Building

AI Overview

The physical construction of the Empire State Building took a record-breaking 1 year and 45 days (410 days), beginning on March 17, 1930, and completing on April 11, 1931. The total cost at the time was approximately $40.95 million (including the land and demolition of the old Waldorf-Astoria hotel), which equals roughly $680 million today.

Timeline Details

  • Land Assembly & Prep: Land purchase and demolition of the Waldorf-Astoria occurred across 1929 and early 1930.

  • Construction Start: March 17, 1930.

  • Building Pace: Steel frameworks rose at an astonishing rate of 4.5 stories per week.

  • Structural Completion: April 11, 1931 (12 days ahead of schedule).

  • Official Opening: May 1, 1931, when President Herbert Hoover turned on the lights from Washington, D.C.

The Hoover Dam

AI Overview

It took five years to build the Hoover Dam. Construction started in 1931 and finished in 1936. The dam itself cost $49 million back then. That is about $850 million to $1 billion today. The power plant and generators cost another $71 million, which makes the total project cost about $120 million then and roughly $2 billion today. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Construction Timeline

  • Start date: April 1931 (preliminary work began in July 1930)

  • Concrete pouring: Started in June 1933

  • Dam completion: May 1935, two years ahead of schedule

  • Final features finished: March 1936 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Cost Breakdown

  • Dam structure cost (1930s): $49 million

  • Power plant and gear cost (1930s): $71 million

  • Total combined cost (1930s): $120 million

  • Total cost in current dollars: Roughly $2 billion when including the power plant and machinery.

Instead of staging a PR photoshoot on the banks of a small stream while wringing their hands and whining piteously and ineffectively, this trio might better serve their constituents by returning to Washington and undo and dismantle some of the ruinous regulatory world they and their colleagues have created over the past 6 decades.

Pending on King Street

1365 King Street, guide price $1.5 million, pending after just six days. Listed as both land and residential, I think it’s fair to say that it will be selling as land. Just two acres in the 4 acre zone (it’s an “estate sale”, but not that kind of estate), so there will be some square footage restraints, but obviously, given how quickly a buyer (and probably more than one) stepped up, that wasn’t a major hurdle.

"Get out and stay out! But please leave your money behind, eh?"

“a vision for you”

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration has published a searchable database of Big Apple properties that could fall under the state’s new pied-à-terre tax, effectively doxxing thousands of wealthy New Yorkers.

The city’s Department of Finance uploaded the comprehensive list – which purports to cover all unoccupied, non-primary residences in the five boroughs worth north of $1 million – including the full names and addresses of every property owner.

“It’s a reckless and foolish move, especially considering there are potentially thousands of properties on this list that do not qualify as second homes or whose owners will successfully dispute their inclusion,” Council Minority Leader David Carr (R-Staten Island) — whose own home appears on the list — told The Post Monday.

Property ownership records are public information, of course, but compiling a special list of wealthy owners in an easily-searchable format is essentially inviting the new assassination culture types populating Mmadani’s DSA party to act; dangerous stuff.

This comes just three days after he mocked rich New York property owners by exulting in his pied-a-terre luxury tax:

This communist mayor’s message to wealthy New Yorkers couldn’t be clearer: “we don’t want you”, and the results are already being seen. When Mamdani videoed himself standing in front of Citadel’s Ken Griffin’s clearly-identifiable penthouse last January gloating over the new tax, Griffin, who’d already fled to Florida because of previous tax-the-rich programs of the last two mayors, cancelled his planned multi-billion expansion of NYC headquarters and shifted that growth to Florida instead.

His won’t be the only example of this accelerating exodus.

Is it something I said?

“somewhere out there, someone is blaspheming!”

I received the following notification of a new subscriber to this blog just now: the GAR has signed up for an automatic feed of my wit and wisdom. Now, it’s possible that, after 22 years of my blogging, the organization has finally and suddenly discovered an urgent desire not to miss a single pearl of wisdom published here, but it’s also possible that one of my fellow realtors of a different political persuasion has filed a complaint about its content.

This could be the start of something entertaining

We’ll see what the GAR’s intent is, but some years ago, after I’d posted a story of the newly-enacted National Association of Realtors’ rule that claimed the authority to govern everything posted by members on social media, real estate-related or not, including and especially political opinions, I received an unsolicited email from a lawyer at the Northwest Legal Foundation, saying that they were looking for a test case against the NAR’s rule, and would be happy to represent me if any action were ever taken against me. That offer’s probably still valid, or, heck, I’m not all that busy these days, and can just resume my legal practice, with a client of one.

So stay tuned: there could be some interesting blog fodder coming to these pages in the near future.

France's Interior Minister Laurent Nunez: ”The motive of the attack remains unknown"

Crazed Paris terrorist cuts down 3 women, then screams, ‘Allah commanded me’

A knife-wielding madman said he was being “commanded” by Allah when he cut down three women on the streets of Paris Monday, including a pregnant expectant mother in a shocking caught-on-camera attack.

The man … stalked the sidewalk clutching a pair of butcher knives. He attacked three women, aged 19, 24 and 36 before good Samaritans confronted and took him down, putting an end to the rampage.

And this gem:

The French national ⁠anti-terrorist prosecutor’s office said it was weighing whether to open an investigation.